Skip to main content

I’ll See your Copperfield and Raise you a Fezziwig




Cue Juliet:

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.

Juliet is saying names don’t matter. If we called this plant a dung bucket instead of a rose, it wouldn’t change anything. It would still look and smell pretty. What we call something is unimportant.

 Juliet was wrong.

Names are important. Names are often the first thing we learn of someone. They can help to convey an initial emotional attachment. Look at some of the names that Dickens chose for his characters: Chuzzlewit, Cratchit, Fagin, Fezziwig, Grimwig, Honeythunder, Pardiggle, Pecksniff, Scrooge, Tulkinghorn. Without knowing anything about these characters, you can get some sort of feeling about them just from their names.  One can overdo this of course, it is not good to get overly descriptive with the names unless you are aiming for farce. But names should be carefully considered. They should add to, or at least not detract from the narrative.

When I am writing a story, when I am in the thick of it, I don’t necessarily want to stop and come up with a name for this new character I just introduced. One trick that I sometimes use is to use a temporary filler name like “Ffff” for a female character or “Mmmm” for a male character. After some time has passed and I have calmed down from a manic writing state, I can give some thought to what would work best for a name, what fits the character, what emotional pull do I want it to have. If I decide that the perfect name for her is Katarina, then I can just use the Find and Replace tool to substitute “Katarina” for “Ffff”.

I also tend to like relatively short, relatively simple names. First because it is easier to write “Mae” than it is to write Magdaleniana. Of course, I could use my substitute trick above and substitute it in without having to write it every time. But I have another reason for liking shorter, simpler names. I have pity on my readers. See, I am a reader first, a writer second. Sometimes I come across a name in a story that I don’t know how to pronounce or it is just so long that my brain gives up trying to pronounce it and I produce a brain mumble. I can do this unconsciously. I can find myself well into the story and realize I don’t know who anybody is. You need to be able to pronounce the name in your head if you are going to make an association with that character. If I find myself brain mumbling, I try to stop and actually sound it out (if the story is worth it). The genre that I usually write in is speculative fiction (fantasy and/or science fiction). I also like to read speculative fiction where this name issue can be a problem. See, if you are on an alien world or a far-flung future, or a magical kingdom, there are no rules for names. You can go crazy and name your character “Kthzhfrllpyxms” if you want. But you are making it hard on your reader, and if you have more than one character named like that, no one is ever going to be able to keep them straight.

I sometimes have the same problem with foreign names. I have read a fair amount of Russian literature and I can find myself tripped up by names that sound unfamiliar to my American ear. And on top of that, in a Russian story, a character could be referred to by his first name, his last name or a combination with his patronym (a patronym tell lineage: Ivanovich = son of Ivan or Ivanovna = daughter of Ivan). In Crime and Punishment, the main character is sometimes referred to as Rodion Raskolnikov or other times as Rodion Romanovich. If I am reading a good novel like Crime and Punishment, it is worth my time to stop and sort out the pronunciations and figure out the patronym rules. Then the story can come alive. And it is not Dostoevsky’s fault that I am not Russian.

But when I am writing, I don’t want to take my readers out of the story by assigning an unpronounceable name. I try to follow the same rule for place names too. Again, in fantasy or science fiction I could call a place anything I want, but if I want my readers to become acquainted with a place, I need to make the name accessible. Keeping a name simple and pronounceable does not mean it has to be bland. “Mordor” is a simple name invented by Tolkien, but it works well as a place of evil.

You should take time and thought when coming up with names, whether it is for a story, a song, or the name of your child. So, sweet Juliet, names are important. What’s in a name? A whole world.

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).


Link to Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t