Skip to main content

Telephonicus domesticus



Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.)

Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and were themselves being used for communications. The boundaries between phones and computers became blended.  These advances not only changed the way we use phones, they changed the whole idea of communication. But I think the huge conceptual leaps in communications are over for a while now. I think in the foreseeable future we will get small incremental advances.

In my new novel Star Liner which is set in a far future, I put a communication device that everyone uses. They are called arm pads or “pads”. I am a little chagrined to admit the pads in my story are not a terribly great technological leap. Think of a modern tablet miniaturized to fit on your wrist with a holographic projector. Except for the holographic projector part, my pads are not much advanced from what is attainable right now. It is hard to visualize the next big leap in communication technology. Perhaps there will be devices hardwired into your brain where you only have to think about the person you want to talk to and then just think about what you want to say and it will be done. You could carry on two conversations at once . . . or maybe not. It is hard to see that as much of an advantage. Despite protestations to the contrary, humans are not very good at multitasking. Until our brains change, we are destined to remain a mostly single tasking species.  

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book or paperback through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more