A speculative mind

I just recently finished the novel 11-22-63 by Stephen King. The date in the title is the day that President Kennedy was assassinated. It is a date that anyone who lived through that time would recognize. I suppose it would be equivalent of September 11 th , 2001 for anyone who was alive on that date, or December 7 th , 1941 for anyone who was alive then. This is a book about time travel. Our protagonist (Jake) is shown a portal that leads him back to 1958. Al, the man who shows him this portal,  wanted to use it to prevent the assassination but Al came down with cancer and is unable to do the job so he encourages Jake to do it. Jake is reluctant to do this because he doesn’t know what the consequences would be. Right on Jake. The whole thing sounded like a really bad idea to me. You can imagine how even small changes in the past can mushroom into larger changes to history over time. But to alter a seminal event like the assassination of a president would have to have enormo

Every once and a while I am struck by the journey that leads us to where we wind up. Education and experience have long lasting and sometimes unexpected results. When I took algebra in high school, I learned about SOH-CAH-TOA. This is a mnemonic that helps you find missing information about a right triangle, if you know some of the information. For example the “SOH” in the mnemonic stands for S ine (of the angle) equals the O pposite divided by the A djacent, where the opposite and adjacent are the lengths of two of the sides of the triangle. This is one of those things you learn in school where you say “okay I will learn it for the test, but I am never going to use this in my life.” Then at one point in my life I went to work for a surveyor’s office. Surveyors usually deal in horizontal distances. So if the deed or the survey says that going from point A to point B is 100 feet long, that means it is 100 feet horizontally. If it is steep, you may measure 120 feet on the groun

The other night I had the experience of going to one of our local theater company’s production of Othello . Now this version was a little different. That statement is almost a cliché now because almost every production of Shakespeare is “a little different.” People are always finding new or inventive ways of producing Shakespeare. They will set plays in the 1940’s, or during the Civil War, or the roaring 20’s, or with all Elvis Impersonators (okay I made that last one up, but I wouldn’t put it past some director out there). This particular production of Othello was set underground beneath New York City and it was steampunk (I will assume you know what steampunk is, if not, look it up. That is a discussion for another day.) This production and the choices made, worked. Alas, not all the alternative settings for a Shakespeare production do work. It all comes down to how much thought the production team put into the concept. It is easy to come up with an offbeat idea for a prod

Has there ever been a more iconic vision than the sight of Princess Leia wearing that metal bra (and not much else) in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi? It has inspired many an adolescent fantasy and continues to do so today, more than thirty years after it appeared on the screen. You can find images of it, or artistic renderings of it all over the internet. On the one hand it is just another example of Hollywood sexploitation. Of course she appeared that way on the movie poster even though Carrie Fisher really wasn’t wearing it for much of the film, just two scenes. There are many examples of Hollywood sexploitation, too many to name. They have been doing this since the 1920’s and still are today. It is such a common feature of movies that movies without it are almost the exception. And it is not just the women (well okay, it’s mostly women) but from time to time they do put scantily clad males on display too. The whole point of doing this is to get people into the theater. It