Skip to main content

Princess Leia's Bra



Has there ever been a more iconic vision than the sight of Princess Leia wearing that metal bra (and not much else) in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi? It has inspired many an adolescent fantasy and continues to do so today, more than thirty years after it appeared on the screen. You can find images of it, or artistic renderings of it all over the internet. On the one hand it is just another example of Hollywood sexploitation. Of course she appeared that way on the movie poster even though Carrie Fisher really wasn’t wearing it for much of the film, just two scenes. There are many examples of Hollywood sexploitation, too many to name. They have been doing this since the 1920’s and still are today. It is such a common feature of movies that movies without it are almost the exception. And it is not just the women (well okay, it’s mostly women) but from time to time they do put scantily clad males on display too.

The whole point of doing this is to get people into the theater. It must work because they keep doing it. And that is certainly why they put Leia on the poster. But apart from bringing people in, does it add much to the movie? Usually not much. I mean, I like to look at scantily clad women as well as the next guy (or whatever your preference) but in ninety-nine out of  a hundred such films,  the scenes would generally make just as much sense to the plot of the movies if the women weren’t wearing ridiculous clothes.

But it seems to me there is something different about the Princess Leia outfit. As I said, it still resonates with a certain demographic all these decades later. Other images have not had that kind of staying power. I remember when Raquel Welch performed in an otherwise forgettable movie called One Million Years BC (Yes I know there are fans of the movie who consider it a classic, but I am not one). There was a famous poster featuring her in an outfit that was just about as revealing as Leia’s. The Raquel poster was all the rage for a while, but I don’t think it had the staying power of Leia in her hardware. Why is that? Well, for one thing the first three Star Wars films were much more popular than One Million years BC, and they had their own staying power that spoke to each successive generation. People cared about the Luke, Leia, and Han. It wasn’t just about special effects or sexy women.

And that is the takeaway. Having scantily clad women on the poster is a successful marketing strategy. I am sure it has even drawn me in to a movie or two, but staying power comes from having a well written, well-acted film with characters you can care about.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).


link to Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...