Skip to main content

A Little Ambiguity is a Good Thing




I was recently watching a Q & A session on You Tube with the author John Scalzi. One of the questioners was asking about Scalzi's book Lock In. Lock in is an interesting book set in the near future in the aftermath of a pandemic that has left 1% of the population totally paralyzed (locked in), unable to move or communicate verbally. This is a huge health crisis (see any parallels today? But it was written in 2014) To overcome this, the technology has been developed to allow the consciousness of a Locked in patient to control an android body that allows him or her to interact with the outside world. The protagonist and narrator, Chris, is a lock in patient that through the use of a robot avatar is able to work as a FBI agent. What follows is a futuristic police procedural.

The person talking to John Scalzi at this Q & A session said they had listened to the audiobook of lock In and noticed that there were two versions of the audiobook: One narrated by Wil Wheaton and the other narrated by Amber Benson. He asked Scalzi why he did this, and was there any reason he should listen to the other version.  Scalzi said, he purposely left the question of Chris’s gender open. Chris’s gender really doesn’t matter to the story. He said it was interesting that most of the men who read the story were sure that Chris was male while most women listening to the story were certain that Chris was female. This sort of blew me away, I had read the story thinking Chris was male. It never even occurred to me that there was any question of (his) gender. But looking back on it I can see that the gender of Chris is irrelevant to the story. Chris interacts with the world through an android body and through an online virtual space that allows him/her to interact with other lock ins. Chris could be male, female, any flavor of LGBTQ, or asexual. Gender really does not matter to a person in Chris’s situation.

I remembered this when a friend of mine, who had read my book (Star Liner), asked if my main character was male or female. She really wasn’t certain. That gave me pause. I had never considered Jan as anything other than male. The first draft of my story had been written in third person, so there were plenty of friendly pronouns that would let everyone know that Jan was male (he/him/his). But before I had even finished the first draft, I came to the conclusion that the story would really be better if it was told in first person, with Jan telling his own story. I spent days going through the story and changing it, mainly altering those pesky pronouns (to I/we/our), and then making sure that it all made sense. After my friend asked her question, I suddenly realized that there were very few clues given as to his gender. The name Jan, could certainly go either way. Jan does have sex with a woman, but I don’t go into detail, so that doesn’t give it away. After looking through it, I found that there are actually one or two places in the book that make it clear that Jan is a man (one is the second sentence of the novel), but a casual reader might miss that.  

I thought to myself, what a missed opportunity. It would have been great if I had written it start to finish with the intention of making Jan’s gender ambiguous. The reason I say this is because, like Scalzi’s novel, Jan’s gender doesn’t make a lick of difference to the story. If Jan were a woman, the story would play out the same. The sexual relationship would be a homosexual one instead of a heterosexual one but so what? One would think that in the far-flung future, sexual orientation would make even less of a difference than it does today. The novel could have made a passive statement that gender doesn’t matter. What does matter is the content of your character.

Incidentally, I did intentionally do that with race. No race or ethnicity is ever mentioned in my story, because in my far-flung future, race does not matter. The characters can be whatever race the reader wants to assign to them. They are human; that’s all that matters.

I wish I was as clever as John Scalzi (in so many ways!) If you are unfamiliar with his work, I encourage you to check him out. His Old Man's War series, Red Shirts, and his current Collapsing Empire series are must-reads for anyone of a science fiction persuasion. 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).


Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more