Skip to main content

Simple Answers

 


People like to have simple answers. That is why we categorize things. It makes it easier to fit into our minds. We give magnitude numbers to things like earthquakes hurricanes, and tornados.  It is easy to do. Measuring wind speed or the magnitude of vibrations is easy. The problem is that how destructive an earthquake or a tornado is may not necessarily increase with the numerical index. A magnitude 6 earthquake might be 100 times more destructive than a magnitude 7. The magnitude 7 might be deeper underground, or be of shorter duration. The magnitude 6 might be under a populated area with lax building codes. There are a lot of factors that determine how destructive something is, not the least of which is the amount of human suffering. Quantifying the human suffering of an event is a job more suited to an artist that a bean counter.

But people want simple answers. Why did the Titanic sink? The captain must have been an idiot. There is a simple answer for you. It is all the answer as some people want. They don’t want to be bothered with the nuance. But the captain was being pressured by the shipping line to beat the record for an Atlantic crossing. The ship was considered unsinkable. Icebergs that late in the season were considered rare. The wireless operator received a transmission that there was heavy sea ice in the area, but he failed to report it to the captain. The builders trying to save money, used inferior steel in the rivets, weakening the hull. The second officer, who did not make the voyage, forgot to return the keys to the binocular locker, so the lookouts had no binoculars. Captain Smith probably deserves some of the blame, but the full story is more complex.

Politicians know that people want simple answers and they do their best to give people simple answers because if they try to explain the full story, it weakens their argument. It loses punch. Consider two candidates who are talking to voters about unemployment. The first candidate says that the reason we have high unemployment is because of A, B, C, and D, and then starts to explain economic theory. The second candidate says the reason we have high unemployment is because of X. Just X. People are going to vote for the second candidate because he gave them an answer they can understand. Now the first candidate sees this and learns, so he starts dumbing down his argument to couch it in simple terms. “Populist” politicians love to do this; find a simple answer no matter how complex the problem. Often this involves a scape goat. In Hitler’s Germany, it was the Jews who were blamed for all the problems. Truth doesn’t matter. A simple answer is all that matters. It’s so much easier to say, “it’s all their fault,” than it is to actually fix problems. In many countries today racial minorities find themselves being blamed as the root cause for . . . whatever the problem of the day is. Again, truth doesn’t matter. A simple answer is all that matters.

Science likes to get the full story. If the answer isn’t simple, so be it. The truth is what is important. Thus, there is a sort of a love/hate relationship between the general public and science. The public loves it when science discloses wonders, but hate it when science tells them something they don’t want to hear, and the reasons for that ‘something’ are complex and may require a science degree to fully understand. Some politicians attack science when it suits their needs because they know the scientists will be hopeless in the court of public opinion.

I am sorry, but the answers to some questions are not black or white like we might want them to be. Answers to big questions require complex deliberation and patience.


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more