Skip to main content

The Mad Scientist


 

“And by the way it’s not about making money, it’s about taking money. Destroying the status quo because the status is not quo. The world is a mess and I just need to rule it.” – Dr. Horrible, from Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog.

The mad scientist is one of the classical literary tropes of science fiction. But wait a minute. What’s a trope? I know there are some out there who have heard the term but are too embarrassed to ask what it is. A trope is a literary device or motifs, something that is used over and over. It can be a figure of speech, an iconic character, a cliché.  In a mystery it can be the detective with personal problems. In a Jane Austin novel, it could be the young woman who is too smart for her own good. And In science fiction, we have the mad scientist.

“My limbs now tremble and my eyes swim with the remembrance, but then a restless, and almost frantic impulse urged me forward. I seemed to have lost all soul or sensation but for this one pursuit.” – Victor Frankenstein, Frankenstein.

One of the earliest books that can truly be called science fiction is Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. Victor Frankenstein seems to be the archetype of the mad scientist, and yet, despite his hubris and his flaws I would be hard pressed to call him mad. H. G. Wells gave us some true-blue mad scientists. In the Island of Dr. Moreau, the mad doctor conducts horrific experiments on animals and humans without any scruples. He has lost all sense of morality and empathy. He is evil. Another Wells novel the Invisible Man has a scientist who treats himself with chemicals to make himself invisible. But the chemicals eat away at his sanity and he goes on a killing spree.

The Wells novels are from the late 1890’s. Frankenstein is from 1818. The origins of the Mad scientist may be even earlier with Christopher Marlow’s book, The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus from 1607.  One, or all of them must have touched off a nerve to make the mad scientist a stock character in science fiction novels, comic books, James Bond, and lots of B movies.

 Mad scientists are not necessarily evil. Take Dr. Walter Bishop in the TV show Fringe. Yes, he is a few sticks short of a bundle, but he is also charming and funny in a (mostly) nonthreatening way. The main character in The Absent Minded Professor is loveable and, if not mad, is certainly eccentric. The Disney film was based on a short story by Samuel W. Taylor and his main character was purportedly based on a real professor at Princeton (whose nickname was Dr. Boom. Doesn’t that make your imagination work overtime).

Over the years, lots of writers and film makers have employed the mad scientist character as the focal point of conflict in their stories. One can only imagine that they are fun to create and develop. I myself have never written a mad scientist, though I have written sociopathic villains. That brings up a good point. Sociopaths, psychopaths, people with narcissistic personality disorder; these are all people with real mental health issues. We live in an age where people are recognizing that mental health issues should be dealt with seriously. And we need to avoid stereotyping mental health the same way we need to avoid stereotyping racial identities. But science fiction is fiction, and fiction has to have conflict, and often that conflict needs to be supplied by a “bad” person. Anyone who is bad, probably fits somewhere on the mental health spectrum (as do we all). So, I am okay with the use of the mad scientist as long as he is not being made fun of for real health issues and as long as the author is not equating mental health issues with evil. After all, we all have our own demons.


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more