Skip to main content

A Class for Film Buffs

 


When I was in my second year in college, I took a class called “General Sociology Through Film.” It seemed like it would be a fun class. Watching movies was part of the curriculum. I like movies. It was a great concept, and a popular class. I am not sure how much actual sociology I learned from that class, but maybe some of it sunk in.

The class met on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Monday was a one-hour lecture about some sociological principle. Wednesday was a two-hour period where we watched the film for that week. Friday was a discussion of the film. There were a couple of mid-term exams and a final exam where we could prove that this was an academic experience. As I said, I couldn’t tell you what concepts I learned in the class, but I do remember the movies.

Part of the class focused on human development: childhood, adolescence, adulthood, etc.. We skipped early development. For the young-adult leaving home for the first time, we watched Next Stop Greenwich Village. For marriage, we watched Ryan’s Daughter. For divorce, we watched An Unmarried Woman. For old age, we watched Harry and Tonto. There were other movies we watched that I don’t remember the concepts being illustrated, but the movies included: Soylent Green, A Boy and His Dog, 2001: A Space Odyssey. The ones I have listed are the ones I remember. I remember them because they had some kind of impact on me. Some of them I had seen before on television. But seeing them in class uncut on a large screen pulled me in more than they ever had before.

A Boy and hid Dog was an eye-opening experience for me. I had never seen it, didn’t know anything about it, and it was my first exposure to Harlan Ellison (well, other than the Star Trek episode “City on the Edge of Forever,” but that hardly counts as Ellison denounced what they did to his script). I was blown away by this post-apocalyptic tale and the dystopian society the boy was lured into, that it was a satire of certain American subcultures (and it is set in 2024).

I am guessing that this class took place around 1980, so these movies were not all that old at the time. As the years passed, I have been struck by the thought that maybe this class did not say as much about general sociology as it did about the psychology of the professor who was teaching it. The movies that he chose said something about him. For example, he chose a movie about divorce implying that divorce was a normal part of human development. I understand that many couples get divorced, but does that make it a normal part of what it means to be human? Hmm. Discuss amongst yourselves. I notice looking back that many of the films have death as a central theme or major sub theme. Perhaps he was saying the way we deal with death is one of the most important traits that make up our society. To put it in the words of Captain Kirk, “How we face death is at least as important as how we face life.” (but I took this class before Kirk ever said that line).

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Retired

  I retired this week. So, big lifestyle changes for me? Not so much. I retired on Thursday. My office had an amazing party for me on Wednesday, lots of food, lots of cards, lots of personal connections. Gifts too, I wish I had told them, no gifts. I really don’t need anything. But all this does make one feel appreciated. It also makes me feel appreciated that they want me to come back on a contractual basis every now and then to impart my institutional knowledge. It is always the case when someone retires, knowledge is lost to the organization. Things have to be relearned by the next generation. This is somewhat offset by the fact that the world is changing through advancing technology etc. So, the knowledge that the retiring person has might eventually become obsolete anyway. Better to go out while you are still on top. We have all seen professional athletes who stayed on well beyond their prime. It would have been better to go out while still on top. But it is a hard thing to ...

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

My first experience with cyberpunk as a genre of science fiction was Neuromancer by William Gibson. Neuromancer was one of the early works that defined the cyberpunk genre. It was insanely influential. It won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award. But for me, it just did not resonate. I had a hard time visualizing the concepts. It left a bad taste in my mouth for cyberpunk. I mostly avoided the genre. Then a couple of years ago I read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson which is cyberpunk (although some people say it is a parody of cyberpunk). Whatever, I liked it. I recently picked up All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu and it immediately became apparent to me that this was cyberpunk. Julia Z is the main character, and I think this is going to be the start of a series following her. She is a hacker (hence cyberpunk). She has got herself in trouble and so she lives on the margins, barely making it. Then a lawyer asks her for her help. His wife has been kidnapped. The ...

Darkness

  There was a moment when I discovered that l liked dark music. I do like dark music. I like minor keys and a haunting theme. I like other kinds of music too, but that darkness speaks to me in a special way. What does that say about me? Am I messed up? I don’t think so. Maybe I am just built that way that haunting tunes or lyrics imparts some inner truth to me. It resonates. I know precisely when I discovered this about myself. It was Summer of 1971. I was 12 years old. I was on a plane with my family heading to Illinois. Airplanes back then did not have much in the way of entertainment, but what they did have were headphones and music channels you could listen to. I was listening to a channel of popular current hits, and a song came on called “That’s the Way I Always Heard it Should Be” by Carly Simon. I had never heard of Carly Simon. This was before “Anticipation” and “You’re so Vain.” She was not yet famous. But this song came on and, I don’t know, it did something to me. It...