Skip to main content

A Class for Film Buffs

 


When I was in my second year in college, I took a class called “General Sociology Through Film.” It seemed like it would be a fun class. Watching movies was part of the curriculum. I like movies. It was a great concept, and a popular class. I am not sure how much actual sociology I learned from that class, but maybe some of it sunk in.

The class met on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Monday was a one-hour lecture about some sociological principle. Wednesday was a two-hour period where we watched the film for that week. Friday was a discussion of the film. There were a couple of mid-term exams and a final exam where we could prove that this was an academic experience. As I said, I couldn’t tell you what concepts I learned in the class, but I do remember the movies.

Part of the class focused on human development: childhood, adolescence, adulthood, etc.. We skipped early development. For the young-adult leaving home for the first time, we watched Next Stop Greenwich Village. For marriage, we watched Ryan’s Daughter. For divorce, we watched An Unmarried Woman. For old age, we watched Harry and Tonto. There were other movies we watched that I don’t remember the concepts being illustrated, but the movies included: Soylent Green, A Boy and His Dog, 2001: A Space Odyssey. The ones I have listed are the ones I remember. I remember them because they had some kind of impact on me. Some of them I had seen before on television. But seeing them in class uncut on a large screen pulled me in more than they ever had before.

A Boy and hid Dog was an eye-opening experience for me. I had never seen it, didn’t know anything about it, and it was my first exposure to Harlan Ellison (well, other than the Star Trek episode “City on the Edge of Forever,” but that hardly counts as Ellison denounced what they did to his script). I was blown away by this post-apocalyptic tale and the dystopian society the boy was lured into, that it was a satire of certain American subcultures (and it is set in 2024).

I am guessing that this class took place around 1980, so these movies were not all that old at the time. As the years passed, I have been struck by the thought that maybe this class did not say as much about general sociology as it did about the psychology of the professor who was teaching it. The movies that he chose said something about him. For example, he chose a movie about divorce implying that divorce was a normal part of human development. I understand that many couples get divorced, but does that make it a normal part of what it means to be human? Hmm. Discuss amongst yourselves. I notice looking back that many of the films have death as a central theme or major sub theme. Perhaps he was saying the way we deal with death is one of the most important traits that make up our society. To put it in the words of Captain Kirk, “How we face death is at least as important as how we face life.” (but I took this class before Kirk ever said that line).

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, wh...

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this...

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up...