Skip to main content

What is this point of view stuff anyway?



What is this point of view stuff anyway?

So a person who shall remain nameless, recently told me that they were confused about the different kinds of points of view in writing. This seemed like a good topic for my first blog post, so here goes:

First Person: The narrator is telling you his or her personal story. This has the advantage of letting the audience make a personal connection with the main character, to really get inside his/her head. The disadvantage is that you only get the point of view of one character. The reader only gets to see what that character has seen and can remember. Often uses the pronouns: I, me, we.
Example: Moby Dick: “Call me Ishmael . . .”

Second Person: The narrator is telling you what you did or what you want to do, or will do. This is almost never used in novels, more often in advertising copy. The disadvantages to this are obvious as it can be very limiting and awkward. Often uses the pronouns: you, your, our.
Example: Winnie the Pooh

Third Person Omniscient: The narrator knows everything about the story, everything about what all the characters are going to do and think and say. But the narrator only reveals what he wants to, when he wants to. The narrator can make judgments about the characters or situations. This has the advantage of letting the story switch to wherever it needs to, whenever it needs to. It also allows the reader to see more than what the characters are seeing. Often uses the pronouns: he, she, they.
Example: A Christmas Carol by Dickens

Third Person Limited: The narrator is telling the reader what is seen and heard and felt by one character. The narrator may switch characters at the start of a new scene or chapter, but the reader only sees the scene from that character’s point of view. This has the advantage of getting inside the head of multiple characters. The narrator cannot offer comment or judgement. Same pronouns as Omniscient.
Example: Game of Thrones

That is the basics. If you need more details,  I have found Youtube to be helpful. Just remember that not everything on Youtube is correct. 

Comments

  1. Well you certainly did a good job explaining all the nuances of
    "View Point" --And something I never really thought about -- except when you hear someone's "point of view" that is vastly different from the facts YOU witnessed !

    ReplyDelete
  2. It was a good and short post!
    Thank you

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is tr

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up (or