Skip to main content

What is this point of view stuff anyway?



What is this point of view stuff anyway?

So a person who shall remain nameless, recently told me that they were confused about the different kinds of points of view in writing. This seemed like a good topic for my first blog post, so here goes:

First Person: The narrator is telling you his or her personal story. This has the advantage of letting the audience make a personal connection with the main character, to really get inside his/her head. The disadvantage is that you only get the point of view of one character. The reader only gets to see what that character has seen and can remember. Often uses the pronouns: I, me, we.
Example: Moby Dick: “Call me Ishmael . . .”

Second Person: The narrator is telling you what you did or what you want to do, or will do. This is almost never used in novels, more often in advertising copy. The disadvantages to this are obvious as it can be very limiting and awkward. Often uses the pronouns: you, your, our.
Example: Winnie the Pooh

Third Person Omniscient: The narrator knows everything about the story, everything about what all the characters are going to do and think and say. But the narrator only reveals what he wants to, when he wants to. The narrator can make judgments about the characters or situations. This has the advantage of letting the story switch to wherever it needs to, whenever it needs to. It also allows the reader to see more than what the characters are seeing. Often uses the pronouns: he, she, they.
Example: A Christmas Carol by Dickens

Third Person Limited: The narrator is telling the reader what is seen and heard and felt by one character. The narrator may switch characters at the start of a new scene or chapter, but the reader only sees the scene from that character’s point of view. This has the advantage of getting inside the head of multiple characters. The narrator cannot offer comment or judgement. Same pronouns as Omniscient.
Example: Game of Thrones

That is the basics. If you need more details,  I have found Youtube to be helpful. Just remember that not everything on Youtube is correct. 

Comments

  1. Deb ParrMay 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM

    Well you certainly did a good job explaining all the nuances of
    "View Point" --And something I never really thought about -- except when you hear someone's "point of view" that is vastly different from the facts YOU witnessed !

    ReplyDelete
  2. SangCasterApril 3, 2024 at 6:17 AM

    It was a good and short post!
    Thank you

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more