Skip to main content

What is this point of view stuff anyway?



What is this point of view stuff anyway?

So a person who shall remain nameless, recently told me that they were confused about the different kinds of points of view in writing. This seemed like a good topic for my first blog post, so here goes:

First Person: The narrator is telling you his or her personal story. This has the advantage of letting the audience make a personal connection with the main character, to really get inside his/her head. The disadvantage is that you only get the point of view of one character. The reader only gets to see what that character has seen and can remember. Often uses the pronouns: I, me, we.
Example: Moby Dick: “Call me Ishmael . . .”

Second Person: The narrator is telling you what you did or what you want to do, or will do. This is almost never used in novels, more often in advertising copy. The disadvantages to this are obvious as it can be very limiting and awkward. Often uses the pronouns: you, your, our.
Example: Winnie the Pooh

Third Person Omniscient: The narrator knows everything about the story, everything about what all the characters are going to do and think and say. But the narrator only reveals what he wants to, when he wants to. The narrator can make judgments about the characters or situations. This has the advantage of letting the story switch to wherever it needs to, whenever it needs to. It also allows the reader to see more than what the characters are seeing. Often uses the pronouns: he, she, they.
Example: A Christmas Carol by Dickens

Third Person Limited: The narrator is telling the reader what is seen and heard and felt by one character. The narrator may switch characters at the start of a new scene or chapter, but the reader only sees the scene from that character’s point of view. This has the advantage of getting inside the head of multiple characters. The narrator cannot offer comment or judgement. Same pronouns as Omniscient.
Example: Game of Thrones

That is the basics. If you need more details,  I have found Youtube to be helpful. Just remember that not everything on Youtube is correct. 

Comments

  1. Deb ParrMay 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM

    Well you certainly did a good job explaining all the nuances of
    "View Point" --And something I never really thought about -- except when you hear someone's "point of view" that is vastly different from the facts YOU witnessed !

    ReplyDelete
  2. SangCasterApril 3, 2024 at 6:17 AM

    It was a good and short post!
    Thank you

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more