Skip to main content

Women Science Fiction Authors!


Being a guy, I have sometimes fallen prey to my guyness. I would like to think that I have always been a progressive thinker, always supported civil rights for all, equal pay, equal opportunities etc. And yet I must admit that when I was younger I did carry a bias against reading women science fiction writers. I mean, I was a guy. I was into guy things. I don’t think I even knew I had this bias at the time. I just never seemed to pick up anything written by women. I also don’t think I was alone in this. I think it was (and is?) common for young men to gravitate only to male writers. I don’t think the converse is necessarily true. I don’t think young women only try to read female writers, though never having been a young woman, I can’t say for sure.

I guess some chinks started to appear in my male bias armor when my roommate convinced me to read Ursula K. Le Guin. There was a PBS dramatization of The Lathe of Heaven, which I really liked (the one with Bruce Davidson from the horror film “Willard” fame). So I decided to start reading that one. I enjoyed it so I then went on to read The Dispossessed, which was okay, but nothing for me to get too excited about. Then for a college sociology class I read The Left Hand of Darkness, which I liked better.

Still after that, I was not reading an awful lot of female writers, until about ten years ago when I decided to take on a new project for myself. I decided to read every science fiction novel that had won the Hugo or Nebula Awards. The Hugo Awards are given out by the World Science Fiction Society, and the Nebula Awards are given out by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America. These are the two most prestigious awards given for science fiction and fantasy. In setting the task of trying to read every novel that earned one of these awards, I was opening myself up to writers that I had never read before. This is a good thing, as one tends to get stuck in one’s own rut and read the same people over again.

Just because a book has won an award, does not mean that I am going to like it. In fact there were some of the winners that I did not care for (no, I am not going to tell you which ones I didn’t like). Doing this meant I was exposed to a lot of female writers because a lot of female writers have won one or both of these awards.  Again, some of them I did not care for and did not read any more from them. But some of them I really liked, and some of them I loved. I have now read almost everything that Connie Willis and Lois McMaster Bujold have written.

In the case of Willis, the first book I read was To Say Nothing of the Dog which was funny and engaging. I had no trouble falling for this book. It is in the middle of her Oxford time traveler series which I talked about in another blog. In the case of Bujold, the first book I read was Mirror Dance which is in the middle of her Vorkossigan series. With Willis’ series, I don’t think it matters where in the series you start. But if you want to read the Vorkossigan series, I do not recommend starting where I did. There was such a rich backstory that I was missing. It made it hard to fully connect. After Mirror Dance I didn’t read any more of Bujold’s books for a while. Then one day I was strapped for something to read and I found The Warrior’s Apprentice at the library and read it. Everything clicked for me with the series from that point on. The Vorkossigan saga is now one of my most favorite series ever.

So, what’s the lesson to be learned? Examine your biases, both conscious and unconscious. Take chances on writers that you have never read before. If I had not done so, I would have missed out on some transformative experiences. So examine your limits and stretch them. You will thank yourself down the road.  

. . . and . . . It's here! My novel Starliner is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, or Amazon.com. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out in October 2019.

 Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more