Skip to main content

Embrace the Gray Area


In the big field of speculative fiction there are two major genres fantasy and science fiction. Of course there are all their related sub-genres. There are readers who only read science fiction and refuse to read fantasy, and then there are readers who will only read fantasy. Those purists might have trouble with this article, because I want to talk about the stories that are both, the novels that fall into that gray area. There is a gradient that exist between fantasy and science fiction. Some stories are 100% science fiction and some are 100% fantasy. But some are maybe 15% science fiction and the rest fantasy. Some are mostly science fiction but have a little fantasy to them. Then there are some where you just don’t know. There is a commonality between science fiction and fantasy. In either case there is some aspect of the story that is not to be found in our world as we currently know it. This is why both fall under the heading of ‘speculative fiction’.

Consider Game of Thrones. Of course it is pure fantasy you say . . . or is it? No, as I see it there is a bit of science fiction in there too. It takes place on a planet with an eccentric orbit around its star (or stars) which makes for wildly unpredictable seasons. The Starks may be fond of reminding everyone that “Winter is coming”, but nobody really knows when that is going to happen or how long it will last (Not that anyone pays attention to the warning. They are all too busy fighting.) And then there is the substance known as wildfire. Is it magic, or is it some highly energetic unstable chemical compound that is unknown on our Earth?

Sometimes it may be hard to quantify exactly how much of one of these novels is science fiction and how much is fantasy. But sometimes it’s easy. In Piers Anthony’s Split Infinity novels, it is exactly 50/50. It takes place on a world that exists is two parallel dimensions. One moment the main character, Stile, is on the world that is ruled by technology, and the next he finds himself on the same world, but this one is ruled by magic. As Stile unexpectedly pops back and forth between worlds he has to readjust his brain to accept the world he is in, just as the readers have to readjust our brains.

 Arthur C. Clarke had a famous rule “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” So something like The Book of the New Sun novels by Gene Wolfe are hard to categorize. The books in the series are: The Shadow of the Torturer, The Claw of the Conciliator, The Sword of the Lictor, and The Citadel of the Autarch. (By the way, I think The Claw of the Conciliator may be my favorite title for a book ever.) These books certainly have the feel of fantasy in every fiber of their being, yet they take place thousands of years in a dystopian future where the all of the magical elements are probably just advanced technology.

 

From 2015 to 2017, N. K. Jemisin wrote her amazing Broken Earth trilogy (The Fifth Season, The Obelisk Gate, and The Stone Sky). This is another series set thousands of years in the future with technology that at times masquerades as magic. But it all comes down to the characters coming to terms with who they are and how they are going to survive. This series has won more awards than any other in recent memory, winning both Hugo and Nebula awards. Jemisin is a powerful writer whatever genre she is in.

I understand that some people are drawn to science fiction and find fantasy frivolous. Others are drawn to fantasy and find science fiction cold and off-putting. To me, I probably lean a bit more toward science fiction, but really, a good story is a good story. As long as the characters draw me in and the plot is engaging, I don’t care what genre it is.

(My novel Starliner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, or Amazon.com. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out in October).




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more