Skip to main content

Second Wind

 


You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind.

It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.  In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it.

The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is true in a way, but the cells cannot get energy directly out of sugar. It’s like an automobile. We know that gasoline is made from crude oil, but if you were to put crude oil in your gas tank, it wouldn’t work very well. Crude oil is refined down to various products, one of which is gasoline. ATP is like gasoline. The cellular process of respiration refines glucose down into ATP. There are two types of respiration: aerobic and anaerobic. Aerobic respiration requires oxygen. When you breath, you are pulling air into your lungs. Oxygen is extracted from that air and bound to blood cells which can carry that oxygen around to the rest of the body. In aerobic respiration, one glucose molecule can produce 38 ATP molecules. 38 packets of energy. If you start to run, your muscle cells need more energy to do the work, which means your lungs have to work harder to get more oxygen into the system. More oxygen means more ATPs can be produced which means more energy is available to the cell which means they can work harder. If you are running really hard, at some point the energy requirements are going to start to exceed the amount that can be produced through aerobic respiration no matter how hard you breathe. Cells that are using more energy than they have available, start to faulter. The muscles start to hurt and start slowing down, which means the runner starts slowing down.

But wait! There is another form of respiration called anaerobic respiration (anaerobic means without oxygen). In plants it is called fermentation. Once you have spent all the available energy and things start slowing down, anaerobic respiration kicks in to supplement aerobic respiration. Anaerobic respiration is less efficient that aerobic respiration. You only get two ATPs for each molecule of glucose. That is significantly less, but it adds to the total already being generated and can give the cells and the runner a little boost. This boost is what is referred to as the “Second Wind.” But there is a downside. While the byproducts of aerobic respiration is carbon dioxide and water (which are expelled with each exhale), the byproduct of anaerobic respiration is lactic acid. It used to be thought that lactic acid damaged muscle tissue, but that belief is no longer held. However, It is possible that the breakdown products of lactic acid can contribute to muscle pain.

No runner ever achieved Olympic glory without getting to the second wind stage in their workouts, even though they may not have realized it. The bonus energy is small compared to aerobic respiration, so it is possible for a runner to be in the anaerobic zone without ever feeling the bonus second wind (though they will feel the pain). As a former track athlete, I have felt that second wind a time or two, but most times, I did not notice it.

Star Liner

Comments

  1. WoW ! This is not your usual stuff !
    Although Very Educational - it's after midnight so was hoping for a bedtime story ! 😄

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t