Skip to main content

The Play's the Thing



I think I may have mentioned that I am involved in a playwriting project with my local community theater company. It has to be Christmas themed. As I was casting about for ideas, I came up with one that I believe will follow the guidelines for the project. The play is called “Elevator Time.” Though the title is simple, I like it. It is a nice double entendre. I don’t know yet if they are going to produce my play. Time will tell.

This is actually the fourth play I have written. The other three were all performed by the same theater company. The first two were a part of the Original Scripts project. And the third one was in a project called the 24 Hour Theater (no, the project lasted 24 hours, not the play).

Writing a play is different from writing a novel or a short story. Writing a play is all about dialogue. Playwrights do put some other stuff in there that is not dialogue. That stuff is called stage direction. The thing is, the director and actors are required to hold the dialogue as sacred; they don’t change it. But the stage direction is more like a suggestion. The director may choose to alter it, or come up with something entirely different. So if you are writing a play, the most important thing you put on the page is the dialogue. If you are not good at writing dialogue . . . maybe play writing isn’t for you.

Another way that plays are different is in the matter of control. When writing a novel, you are in complete control of the art that you are producing. Well, an editor may request/require changes. You could even avoid that if you self-published your novel (but you definitely should pay attention to what an editor says!) A play is a much more collaborative effort. The playwright does not (usually) get to be involved in staging, set, or casting decisions. That is the job of the director.  The director has a lot of leeway with regard to his/her interpretation of your play. I have seen a Shakespeare play done in traditional Elizabethan attire and setting, then I saw a different production of the same play that was set in what appeared to be the Viet Nam War. Nobody asked Shakespeare if they could set it in Viet Nam. Of course he is dead. But even living playwrights don’t get much say in how their work will be staged unless they have a lot of clout.

Then, each actor is going to put their own spin on the character. The actor may have limitations that change the way a character acts. The actor may not look even remotely like what the playwright had in mind for the part. Even individual lines can be said an infinite variety of ways.  The playwright was only thinking of one way when he/she wrote it.

So you have the playwright’s words filtered through the director, which are in turn filtered through the actors. A playwright has to accept that this is a collaborative art form. They have to accept the fact that what they are writing is a framework and the end product may be very different from what she/he envisioned. Some people can’t handle that. Some can. I personally find it exciting seeing what the theater company will do with my words.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out in October).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t