Skip to main content

What's in a name?


How important is a name? If the name is the title of a book, or play, a song, a story, or even a non-fiction article, one would tend to think that it is pretty important. After all, the title is likely the first thing an audience will see about the story. In some cases, all the reader knows about the story is the name until they read it. You could argue that the name or title is the first piece of marketing.

Shakespeare had Juliet say, “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” In other words, if instead of calling it a rose, you called it a skunkflower, it would still look and smell like a rose. The name does not change it. Did Shakespeare believe names were unimportant? Further, Shakespeare gave seemingly trivial names to three of his better comedies: Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like it, and What you Will. These names do not say anything about what the plays are about. They almost sound like he is saying, “these plays of mine are probably a waste of your time.”  (What You Will, is better known by its alternate title: Twelfth Night, though even that title doesn’t tell you anything about the play). I don’t think Shakespeare thought titles were unimportant. He penned some good evocative titles too. Perhaps he just did not feel those comedies were as important as some of his other works, or maybe he was just rushed to come up with a title. I have to say that all three of these sound to me like working titles; like he was going to replace them with something better, but somehow never got around to it.

When I am writing a story, sometimes I come up with the title first and it becomes the inspiration for the story. But more often I write the story and then have to come up with a title after it is finished or almost finished. Sometimes I will pick a line from the story that seems to sum it up. Other times it is just a word or phrase that captures the feeling. Sometimes I want a title to be poetic. Other times, keeping it simple seems best. As I mentioned last week, I have written a play for our local theater company for a Christmas show (yes it was accepted and will be performed along with several others in December). The play had been finished for several days, but all of a sudden I realized the deadline was upon me and I had to come up with a title like now. It is a Christmas play but no titles that sounded Christmassy seemed to fit. For a long time I toyed with the title: “Einstein’s Third Law of Elevators”. I liked that title, but it seemed a bit much, and it was about as far away from Christmas as you could get. But I needed something right now! “Elevator Time” popped into my brain. The cast spends time in an elevator . . .  meh. I wrote it on the form and sent it in. It seemed kind of generic and also not Christmassy, but at least it was short and to the point. Then, after I had submitted it, I got to thinking about it and realized that “Elevator Time” actually is a good title. It works on more than one level, which is a good thing for a title to achieve.

A good example of working on multiple levels is the song title “For Good” from the musical Wicked. The characters are saying that they have been changed ‘for good’, meaning changed permanently, but also meaning changed in a way to choose to be good. Also the characters who are singing it are friends saying goodbye ‘for good’. Such a simple title, just two words, yet brilliant.

What’s in a name? A whole world.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t