Skip to main content

Best Science Fiction Movies (part 2)


So this is a continuation of the list of my favorite science fiction films. Here are three more for the list:

The Andromeda Strain. It was based on the novel by Michael Chrichton, and was his first work to be turned into a film. Michael was very, very good to Hollywood. Besides the Andromeda Strain he penned the novels that were turned into many movies including, The Terrminal Man. Jurassic Park, Congo, Sphere, Rising Sun. He also created Westworld, Looker, and the TV show ER, among others.

Andromeda Strain came out in 1971 and is set in a top secret underground facility set up to deal with biohazards. A satellite falls into a small town and some kind of organism on the satellite kills everyone in the town. We follow the scientist as they try to figure out what kind of organism it is and how to neutralize it. They approach the problem, dare I say, scientifically. They don’t just push a button on a computer and the answer pops out. They have to run tests and procedures that at best can only answer part of the question, or in most cases simply rule out things that don’t fit. The wonderful design and sets contribute to the atmosphere. There is an intelligent script and fine acting. The story sucks you in and keeps you on the edge of your seat.

Interstellar. There is a lot to like about the 2014 film Interstellar. It has a thoughtful script, an excellent cast, and the sure fire direction of Christopher Nolan who co-wrote the script. It is also a warning tale about the fragility of the planet we live on and if we screw it up there is likely nowhere else we can go. One of the things I like about it is that it lets us experience what time dilation would be like (always good when you can explain Einstein in a way that the average person can understand). Some of the astronauts have to go down to a planet that is very near a black hole and so while they are on the planet they will experience a time shift from the massive gravity that is not experienced by the astronaut left behind on the mother ship.

Okay, what happens to Cooper as he falls into the black hole may fall more into the realm of fantasy than science, but that is a minor quibble. Generally the humans in the film are human, with all the grandeur and faults that define our species. The film raises questions and does not spoon feed you the answers.


Star Wars. Also known as episode 4. I know there are a lot of people who say that The Empire Strikes back is the best of the series, and in some ways it is. But on my list the original will always be king. I have a bias for the first movie in a series. Sequels are made because the first is so successful. The original is a unique idea. Sequels, no matter how good they are, are copies (one exception that comes to mind is Terminator 2, which far surpassed the original). When I saw the first Star wars in 1977, it was a formative experience for me.

There are not any great scientific ideas in the movie. It is pretty much standard Space Opera, but it is a good story told in a masterful way.  We empathize with Luke Skywalker. He is the underdog who has thrown in with a group of underdogs. What we feel for the character of Luke in the first film, sets the stage for the whole series. The underdogs are matched against a seemingly all-powerful villain. Throw in a likable scoundrel, a feisty princess and Alec Guinness’s portrayal of Obi-Wan Kenobi is the icing on the cake. Yeah, it’s not great science fiction, but it is a great movie.
To be continued next week . . .

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).
Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more