Skip to main content

The Best Science Fiction Movies (Part 3)



This is the third installment of my list of favorite Science fiction films. Again, these are in no particular order.

Alien. Is it horror, or is it science fiction. Of course it is both. The first time I saw Alien it scared the willies out of me. Just so you know, I am not generally a fan of scary movies. I usually don’t watch them unless they are of the campy low budget variety that are so bad they are good. Something attracted me to go and see that film even though I knew it would be scary. It must have been the trailer. Although the marketing made it absolutely clear that this was going to be scary. But something about it caught my interest. The trailer looked so good.  I went to the theater to watch it, and it was quite a ride. The cast was excellent from Tom Skerritt and Yaphet Kotto, and Ian Holm, to a new actress I had never heard of before with the unlikely name of Sigourney Weaver. I was quite taken with Weaver’s portrayal of Ellen Ripley, second in command of the Nostromo. She sold me on the film. Under the direction of Ridley Scott all the actors had a loose naturalistic acting style that made it seem more real. The film is moody and atmospheric. Everything about it looked different from any Sci-fi film I had ever seen. The future was not all gleaming white with glowing buttons that went ‘boing’. No. This future was as dirty and sweaty and as messy as real life. The creature that they find is terrifying and strange, and yet there are aspects of it that seem almost familiar. The larval stage looked like a sea creature that you might possibly find on earth. And in fact, the creature’s life cycle was patterned after some species of wasps who lay their eggs in host prey and the larvae eat their way out, killing the host.

All of these things helped make the film seem more real which lead to greater emotional investment in the story and characters. For those who say that the sequel Aliens is better than the original, I disagree and refer you to last week’s discussion about sequels.

The Day the Earth Stood Still. On the one hand it is yet another 1950’s flying saucer movie. Yet it is so far above all the others of that ilk that it hardly bears comparison. The production values are first rate. The story is intelligent and they obtained some fine actors: Michael Rennie, Patricia Neal, and Sam Jaffe. Alien spaceman Klaatu comes to Earth to tell us humans to stop being so stupid, petty, hate-filled, and war like. If we don’t, they (the space-faring species that he represents) will end us. The film was made during the cold war. Klaatu’s message seemed right on point. Unfortunately it seems that humanity hasn’t progressed much from the 1950’s. The cold war may be over, but the hate mongering paranoia is still with us. Let’s just hope someone like Klaatu isn’t out there watching us.

Blade Runner. Another Ridley Scott entry. It had a wonderful starting point. It was based on a novel by Philip K. Dick called Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. (Philip K. Dick has been a wonderful resource for Hollywood. At least ten movies and three television series have been based on his stories). I read the novel years after seeing the movie. The film and the novel are quite different. The bones of the story are there in the film but it diverges from the novel in tone and explores new ground. We follow a detective as he tries to track down five illegal replicants (artificial humans). The main theme of Philip K. Dick’s story is still there in the film:  at what point does artificial intelligence deserve human rights?  At what point is it no longer artificial? Once again there is a dark and gritty feel to the film. We can almost smell the Los Angeles of 2019. (Really? 2019? We are almost there. Where are the flying cars? For that matter, where are the replicants?) On the surface it is a noir detective story. But deeper questions keep coming to the top. And there is the wonderful work By Harrison Ford and Rutger Hauer.

The Matrix. What a game changer. The Wachowski’s wrote and directed this and stunned everyone with ground-breaking visuals. It asks questions about reality. Is our world real because we perceive it? Or is reality something that we cannot see, and we are just being manipulated. These are questions philosophers have argued about for thousands of years. The film ties into some good old-fashioned paranoia about who is controlling our lives. There is a character who betrays his colleges and chooses the manufactured existence over reality. We may not like him, we may disagree with his choice and hope that he loses, and yet we can understand his choice. He is choosing a pleasant fantasy life over a harsh and horrid real one.

We will finish this off next week and summarize all.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).
The link to my novel Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is tr

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up (or