Skip to main content

The Best Science Fiction Movies (Part 3)



This is the third installment of my list of favorite Science fiction films. Again, these are in no particular order.

Alien. Is it horror, or is it science fiction. Of course it is both. The first time I saw Alien it scared the willies out of me. Just so you know, I am not generally a fan of scary movies. I usually don’t watch them unless they are of the campy low budget variety that are so bad they are good. Something attracted me to go and see that film even though I knew it would be scary. It must have been the trailer. Although the marketing made it absolutely clear that this was going to be scary. But something about it caught my interest. The trailer looked so good.  I went to the theater to watch it, and it was quite a ride. The cast was excellent from Tom Skerritt and Yaphet Kotto, and Ian Holm, to a new actress I had never heard of before with the unlikely name of Sigourney Weaver. I was quite taken with Weaver’s portrayal of Ellen Ripley, second in command of the Nostromo. She sold me on the film. Under the direction of Ridley Scott all the actors had a loose naturalistic acting style that made it seem more real. The film is moody and atmospheric. Everything about it looked different from any Sci-fi film I had ever seen. The future was not all gleaming white with glowing buttons that went ‘boing’. No. This future was as dirty and sweaty and as messy as real life. The creature that they find is terrifying and strange, and yet there are aspects of it that seem almost familiar. The larval stage looked like a sea creature that you might possibly find on earth. And in fact, the creature’s life cycle was patterned after some species of wasps who lay their eggs in host prey and the larvae eat their way out, killing the host.

All of these things helped make the film seem more real which lead to greater emotional investment in the story and characters. For those who say that the sequel Aliens is better than the original, I disagree and refer you to last week’s discussion about sequels.

The Day the Earth Stood Still. On the one hand it is yet another 1950’s flying saucer movie. Yet it is so far above all the others of that ilk that it hardly bears comparison. The production values are first rate. The story is intelligent and they obtained some fine actors: Michael Rennie, Patricia Neal, and Sam Jaffe. Alien spaceman Klaatu comes to Earth to tell us humans to stop being so stupid, petty, hate-filled, and war like. If we don’t, they (the space-faring species that he represents) will end us. The film was made during the cold war. Klaatu’s message seemed right on point. Unfortunately it seems that humanity hasn’t progressed much from the 1950’s. The cold war may be over, but the hate mongering paranoia is still with us. Let’s just hope someone like Klaatu isn’t out there watching us.

Blade Runner. Another Ridley Scott entry. It had a wonderful starting point. It was based on a novel by Philip K. Dick called Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. (Philip K. Dick has been a wonderful resource for Hollywood. At least ten movies and three television series have been based on his stories). I read the novel years after seeing the movie. The film and the novel are quite different. The bones of the story are there in the film but it diverges from the novel in tone and explores new ground. We follow a detective as he tries to track down five illegal replicants (artificial humans). The main theme of Philip K. Dick’s story is still there in the film:  at what point does artificial intelligence deserve human rights?  At what point is it no longer artificial? Once again there is a dark and gritty feel to the film. We can almost smell the Los Angeles of 2019. (Really? 2019? We are almost there. Where are the flying cars? For that matter, where are the replicants?) On the surface it is a noir detective story. But deeper questions keep coming to the top. And there is the wonderful work By Harrison Ford and Rutger Hauer.

The Matrix. What a game changer. The Wachowski’s wrote and directed this and stunned everyone with ground-breaking visuals. It asks questions about reality. Is our world real because we perceive it? Or is reality something that we cannot see, and we are just being manipulated. These are questions philosophers have argued about for thousands of years. The film ties into some good old-fashioned paranoia about who is controlling our lives. There is a character who betrays his colleges and chooses the manufactured existence over reality. We may not like him, we may disagree with his choice and hope that he loses, and yet we can understand his choice. He is choosing a pleasant fantasy life over a harsh and horrid real one.

We will finish this off next week and summarize all.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).
The link to my novel Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t