Skip to main content

FTL: Faster Than Light



Science fiction writers, almost by definition, love science. Yet, ironically, they don’t seem to mind violating it. This happens with time travel, which is the main theme of many a good sci-fi tale. Yet scientists tell us unanimously that time travel (at least going backwards in time) is impossible. That doesn’t stop the author who wants to send his/her character back in time to watch the signing of the Magna Carta. 

Similarly, science fiction authors can’t resist sending space ships out with faster-than-light drives (FTL). This makes sense. If you don’t have a faster-than-light drive, you are pretty much confined to our own solar system. Authors don’t like to be fettered as such. But that pesky Mr. Einstein gave us the laws of relativity, and over the last hundred years, no one has been able to prove Einstein wrong. Star Wars and Star Trek would have gone nowhere (literally) without FTL. The entire series of Battlestar Galactica would have taken place on Caprica where, let’s face it, the Cylons would have won in the first episode. There would have been nowhere for the humans to hide.

Actually there is nothing that prohibits you from journeying to someplace many light years away, you just can’t come back, at least not to the Earth you left behind. Even with conventional engines if you could carry enough fuel to continuously accelerate at 1 G, in about a year’s time you would be approaching the speed of light. At that speed, due to time dilation, you could travel thousands of light years. You could not however tell anyone on Earth what you found out there. From your perspective you were only gone a few years, but thousands of years will have transpired on earth while you were gadding about the universe. Somehow that is not very satisfying to the folks left on Earth who want to know what’s out there.

There are some theoretical ways that have been proposed to (appear to) cheat Einstein. Ever hear of the warp drive? One theory says that you could appear to exceed the speed of light by warping space itself. If you could cause the space in front of a ship to be contracting and the space behind it to be expanding, you could create a situation where the ship could exceed the speed of light. Though how you could actually accomplish this is anyone’s guess. There are also theories about using wormholes or entering into a higher dimensional space (hyperspace).

Science fiction authors have employed these methods and others to get their space ships moving at a reasonable rate. One of the most fun ones was the Infinite Improbability Drive from the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Many writers who employ FTL in their stories never bother to explain how it works. This to me seems perfectly reasonable. I myself did this in my novel Star Liner. I set up some rules about it, because it seems to me that it should not be as simple as flipping on a switch, but I did not explain the mechanics behind it. We expect the readers to accept that someday FTL will be achievable and leave it at that. How many stories are there about time travel? Yet seldom does the author go into the nuts and bolts about how time travel was achieved. Speaking as a reader, I don’t need to be told the mechanics of time travel to enjoy the story. The same is true with FTL (unless there is a plot point in the story that is dependent on some component of how the FTL system works.) What I don’t like are stories (usually television) where people are zooming around the universe without any mention of any kind of FTL, or any limitations. That’s just sloppy writing.

So enjoy your sci-fi novel. If it is a good story, well told, it doesn’t really matter what method they used to get there. Personally I think that someday scientists will figure out a way to surpass the speed of light. But then, I am an optimist.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more