Skip to main content

Superhumans



“You reached for the secret too soon, you cried for the moon.”

I know it is not what Pink Floyd was saying with this lyric from “Shine On you Crazy Diamond”, but something about it makes me think of the Apollo One disaster. America was trying to win the space race and perhaps pushed too hard and tried to do too much too soon, which resulted in three astronauts dead in their capsule. It reminded me that sometimes we push the boundaries of science too hard.

It is apparently human nature to try to do something as soon as we are able. History is full of examples of someone doing something just because they can, before considering all the ramifications. The most recent example is the Chinese scientist who claims to have created the first genetically edited baby by using Crispr. We don’t know if he actually did it or not, that is yet to be proven. Even if he didn’t, it is probably only a matter of time until someone does. The problem is, we are nowhere near understanding all of the consequences of human gene editing. There are people who have died after undergoing attempts at gene therapy. One woman died the day after getting injected with genetically engineered viruses to treat her rheumatoid arthritis. These attempts at gene therapy were done under strict conditions with very limited scope but still the doctors could not predict the outcome. Clearly we weren’t ready.

This is why it takes the FDA years to approve new drugs or medical procedures. Scientists understand that it takes time to understand all the consequences (if they ever can). They understand that because there have been so many mistakes in the past. Thalidomide seemed like a good idea at the time to treat morning sickness in pregnant women. Nobody thought to check if it might cause birth defects.
How does one system in the human body interact with the myriad of other systems? The interdependencies are so complex that it verges on chaos theory. That is not to say that we will never understand what happens when you introduce a new gene or chemical or other stimulus to a human body, just that it might take a very long time to fully understand it.

Hollywood is going through a phase of superhero movies. I like superheroes as much as the next person as long as we recognize it as fantasy. Many of the origin stories for superheroes involve a mutation (X-men, Spiderman, Fantastic Four, etc.). If a human gets exposed to high level of radiation, will it cause a mutation that will turn them into Spiderman? I suppose it is possible (in the same way that if an infinite number of monkeys had an infinite number of typewriters, one of them might bang out the manuscript for Hamlet), but it is far more likely (almost a certainty) that they will die a terrible death. Random mutations to individual cells happen all the time in our bodies. Usually it just produces a cell that can’t survive, and that is the end of that mutation. Sometimes it produces cancer. Very rarely it produces a cell that was better at something than the original cell it came from. This is the driving force of evolution. This is why evolution takes so long. It mostly produces dead ends.

Trying to genetically engineer the human genome is trying to take short cuts in evolution. This is unquestioningly a bad idea until we know everything there is to know about it, which is decades, if not centuries away. Until then the best advice would be: don’t mess with Mother Nature.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon). 

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iron Fist in a Velvet Glove

  Despite both of us having science backgrounds, my wife and I share a leaning toward the artistic, though we may express it in different ways. In her life, my wife has been a painter, a poet, a singer, an actor, and a fiction writer. Not to mention a mother. I don’t remember what precipitated this event, but my wife, my son, and I were at home in the front room. My wife was responding to something my son said. She said, “remember, you get half your brains from me. If it wasn’t for me, you’d be a complete idiot.” To which my son started howling with laughter and said to me,” I think you have just been insulted.” Sometimes I feel like Rodney Dangerfield. I get no respect. But that is not an uncommon state of affairs for fatherhood. When my son was going to middle school and high school, my wife was always the one to go in with him to get him registered for classes. One time she was unable to go and I had to be the one to get him registered. “Ugh,” he said. “why can’t Mama do i...
1 comment
Read more

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more