Skip to main content

Evolution


If your religion does not permit you to “believe in science” then read no further. You won’t like this. I am not of the opinion that scientists know everything there is to know. Quite the opposite. We will always have more questions than answers. That is the nature of science.

Being a devotee of science I get a little tired of seeing “aliens” in science fiction shows that look an awful lot like humans. Those of you who follow my blog know that I am a fan of Star Trek. But Star Trek, both the original series and its successors, is probably more guilty of this than anyone. Consider the following: We have Vulcans who look like humans but with pointed ears; Romulans, who look like humans with pointed ears; Klingons, who have changed in the various incarnations but even at their most outlandish, just look like humans with plates on their forehead; Kardashians, who look like humans but with big boobs and butts (sorry I couldn’t help myself); I mean Cardassians, who look like humans with scaly necks and ridges on their face; Bajorans, who look like humans with nose wrinkles (even if I did have a crush on Major Kira); Talosians, who look like humans with big heads; Ferengi, who look like humans with big heads and big ears. Andorians, who look like blue humans with antennae. I could go on and on, but you get the point.


To think that natural selection that developed on a different planet would produce anything that remotely looked like us would be like taking a million monkeys who were banging on a million typewriters and having two of them produce identical 200 page novels (maybe with one or two words different).

There are certainly parallel characteristics that appear through evolution. These happen because of convergent evolution and divergent evolution. The fact that goldfish and sharks both have fins is an example of divergent evolution. They share a common ancestor way back in the evolutionary chain that developed fins as a good way of producing locomotion through the water. That common ancestor had offspring and descendants that eventually branched off into new species. Those species had descendants which eventually branched off into more and more species. Most of them retained the fins because fins work well, and fish with fins survive better than fish without fins. This is call divergent evolution because as all the species diverged from one ancestor, they kept the same trait (fins). In this way we can see that they are all related, at least back to that one ancestor.

Convergent evolution is a bit trickier. Bats, birds, and some insects all have wings. But in this case, they do not share a common ancestor that had wings. Bats, birds and insects all evolved wings completely independently from each other. This may be why bat wings, bird wings, and insect wings all look quite different. They all perform the same function (flight) but in each case evolution had to reinvent something that looked like a wing. They developed wings because being able to fly is a useful thing, and there is only one kind of structure that will help you to achieve flight.

Electric organs in fish is another interesting case. Electric eels are the most well-known of fish with electric organs, but there are actually lots of fish that produce an electric charge, though in most cases it is used for navigation (like sonar) rather than as a defense mechanism. As it turns out electric organs developed independently no less than five times. I guess it is just a handy adaptation when you live in murky water. But this is another example of convergent evolution. They all share the same trait even though they do not share a common ancestor with that trait.

So you could say that the same pressures that sculpt the life evolving on other planets, might lead (through convergent evolution) to the same characteristics that developed here; in other words: humanoids. Not very likely. Even if you started with a planet that was exactly like the Earth of three and a half billion years ago, and started with the exact same building blocks for life, and it were to evolve an intelligent species, there is no reason to think they would look anything like us. They might share a few of our characteristics through convergent evolution, but probably no more than the similarities shared by a dragonfly and a fruit bat.

Evolution is a huge roulette wheel. Random mutations happen in life and most of the time those mutations are bad and lead to the death of an organism before it can reproduce, but every once in a great while you will get a mutation that has advantages (like fins) and that will be passed on to the offspring. Organisms that have the advantage will survive and reproduce better than the organisms that don’t, so those that don’t eventually die out.

It seems like Hollywood has been less human-centric in its aliens in recent years. I hope that trend will continue, though, if the story is good enough . . . I will probably watch it anyway.


(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t