Skip to main content

Evolution


If your religion does not permit you to “believe in science” then read no further. You won’t like this. I am not of the opinion that scientists know everything there is to know. Quite the opposite. We will always have more questions than answers. That is the nature of science.

Being a devotee of science I get a little tired of seeing “aliens” in science fiction shows that look an awful lot like humans. Those of you who follow my blog know that I am a fan of Star Trek. But Star Trek, both the original series and its successors, is probably more guilty of this than anyone. Consider the following: We have Vulcans who look like humans but with pointed ears; Romulans, who look like humans with pointed ears; Klingons, who have changed in the various incarnations but even at their most outlandish, just look like humans with plates on their forehead; Kardashians, who look like humans but with big boobs and butts (sorry I couldn’t help myself); I mean Cardassians, who look like humans with scaly necks and ridges on their face; Bajorans, who look like humans with nose wrinkles (even if I did have a crush on Major Kira); Talosians, who look like humans with big heads; Ferengi, who look like humans with big heads and big ears. Andorians, who look like blue humans with antennae. I could go on and on, but you get the point.


To think that natural selection that developed on a different planet would produce anything that remotely looked like us would be like taking a million monkeys who were banging on a million typewriters and having two of them produce identical 200 page novels (maybe with one or two words different).

There are certainly parallel characteristics that appear through evolution. These happen because of convergent evolution and divergent evolution. The fact that goldfish and sharks both have fins is an example of divergent evolution. They share a common ancestor way back in the evolutionary chain that developed fins as a good way of producing locomotion through the water. That common ancestor had offspring and descendants that eventually branched off into new species. Those species had descendants which eventually branched off into more and more species. Most of them retained the fins because fins work well, and fish with fins survive better than fish without fins. This is call divergent evolution because as all the species diverged from one ancestor, they kept the same trait (fins). In this way we can see that they are all related, at least back to that one ancestor.

Convergent evolution is a bit trickier. Bats, birds, and some insects all have wings. But in this case, they do not share a common ancestor that had wings. Bats, birds and insects all evolved wings completely independently from each other. This may be why bat wings, bird wings, and insect wings all look quite different. They all perform the same function (flight) but in each case evolution had to reinvent something that looked like a wing. They developed wings because being able to fly is a useful thing, and there is only one kind of structure that will help you to achieve flight.

Electric organs in fish is another interesting case. Electric eels are the most well-known of fish with electric organs, but there are actually lots of fish that produce an electric charge, though in most cases it is used for navigation (like sonar) rather than as a defense mechanism. As it turns out electric organs developed independently no less than five times. I guess it is just a handy adaptation when you live in murky water. But this is another example of convergent evolution. They all share the same trait even though they do not share a common ancestor with that trait.

So you could say that the same pressures that sculpt the life evolving on other planets, might lead (through convergent evolution) to the same characteristics that developed here; in other words: humanoids. Not very likely. Even if you started with a planet that was exactly like the Earth of three and a half billion years ago, and started with the exact same building blocks for life, and it were to evolve an intelligent species, there is no reason to think they would look anything like us. They might share a few of our characteristics through convergent evolution, but probably no more than the similarities shared by a dragonfly and a fruit bat.

Evolution is a huge roulette wheel. Random mutations happen in life and most of the time those mutations are bad and lead to the death of an organism before it can reproduce, but every once in a great while you will get a mutation that has advantages (like fins) and that will be passed on to the offspring. Organisms that have the advantage will survive and reproduce better than the organisms that don’t, so those that don’t eventually die out.

It seems like Hollywood has been less human-centric in its aliens in recent years. I hope that trend will continue, though, if the story is good enough . . . I will probably watch it anyway.


(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is tr

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up (or