Skip to main content

Vaccines


So, I was sick this weekend. Not unexpectedly. My sickness was the result of a vaccine I had taken on Friday. The literature on the vaccine said 1 in 6 people will have a reaction strong enough to miss work. I guess I am number six. Yay. My reaction, while uncomfortable, was not all that serious. Like the literature said, I had fever, chills and muscle aches for a day. If I had to do it again, I would. The reward outweighs the risk. If I were to get the illness that this vaccine protects me from, I would miss a lot more than one day of work. So this is not an antivaxer blog. This is a provaxer blog.

Antivaxers are people who do not believe in vaccines, who think they will give people autism, or are a government conspiracy, or who just generally don’t like putting foreign substances in their bodies. Antivaxers span the political spectrum. Antivaxers can be found among conservatives, liberals, Greens, and Libertarians. How unifying!

There are risks to getting a vaccine as there are risks for any medical procedure. Most parents would not hesitate to rush their child to the hospital for an operation if that child had a ruptured appendix. The odds of that child dying from an appendectomy is much higher than the chance of anything bad happening from a vaccine. Yet you would do it because the alternative is certain death.

Antivaxers have been around as long as vaccines have. Edward Jenner discovered that people who got cow pox seemed immune from small pox. He developed the small pox vaccine in 1798 from the cow pox organism. The word vaccine comes from “vacca” which means cow in Latin. Early antivaxers soon emerged against the new small pox vaccine saying it would turn people into cows. But the antivaxer craze really took off when a doctor published a bogus study saying a particular vaccine led to a greater risk of autism. The study itself only followed 12 children (a pathetic amount to draw any kind of inference from). Even so, it caused a stir and other researchers began studying the possibility. Study after study found no link between the vaccine and autism. Other problems with that original study caused the journal that published it to retract it.

If a parent’s child is vaccinated and eventually is diagnosed with autism. They are going to believe there is a link. They heard it, they’ve seen it, ergo it has to be so. You won’t be able to argue with that parent. Don’t even try. It is emotional. But the fact is there is no scientific evidence of a link. A lot of kids are diagnosed with autism. Most of those will have been vaccinated, because most kids are vaccinated. But whether they were vaccinated or not the same number of kids would get autism. That is what the science shows. There is no room for emotion in science. The facts are the facts. Just because Aunt Betty tells you not to do a certain procedure because she heard it makes your nose fall off . . .   that is not a reasonable basis to make medical decisions. If you have concerns, you should get the facts, the real facts. If you are getting your facts from social media, that’s a problem.

There is a reason why your great grandmother had 14 kids.  Most of them died young. Most of those that died, would not have died had they lived in the modern age of science and medicine. A lot of those deaths could have been prevented by vaccines that would have prevented most of the epidemics that killed people by the bucketful.

Scientists are sometimes wrong, and each human body is different (which is why people react differently to the same treatment). But when something has been tested and retested and retested, the odds that something bad is going to happen to you are extremely low.

So I suffered through my little bit of chills and fever and I am fine now. Does it mean that it is now impossible for me to get the disease for which I was vaccinated? No. There is still a risk, although it is a much smaller one now. Like I said, I would do it again. Weigh the odds. Do the math. Or (here’s an idea) just ask your doctor.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).


Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more