Skip to main content

Vaccines


So, I was sick this weekend. Not unexpectedly. My sickness was the result of a vaccine I had taken on Friday. The literature on the vaccine said 1 in 6 people will have a reaction strong enough to miss work. I guess I am number six. Yay. My reaction, while uncomfortable, was not all that serious. Like the literature said, I had fever, chills and muscle aches for a day. If I had to do it again, I would. The reward outweighs the risk. If I were to get the illness that this vaccine protects me from, I would miss a lot more than one day of work. So this is not an antivaxer blog. This is a provaxer blog.

Antivaxers are people who do not believe in vaccines, who think they will give people autism, or are a government conspiracy, or who just generally don’t like putting foreign substances in their bodies. Antivaxers span the political spectrum. Antivaxers can be found among conservatives, liberals, Greens, and Libertarians. How unifying!

There are risks to getting a vaccine as there are risks for any medical procedure. Most parents would not hesitate to rush their child to the hospital for an operation if that child had a ruptured appendix. The odds of that child dying from an appendectomy is much higher than the chance of anything bad happening from a vaccine. Yet you would do it because the alternative is certain death.

Antivaxers have been around as long as vaccines have. Edward Jenner discovered that people who got cow pox seemed immune from small pox. He developed the small pox vaccine in 1798 from the cow pox organism. The word vaccine comes from “vacca” which means cow in Latin. Early antivaxers soon emerged against the new small pox vaccine saying it would turn people into cows. But the antivaxer craze really took off when a doctor published a bogus study saying a particular vaccine led to a greater risk of autism. The study itself only followed 12 children (a pathetic amount to draw any kind of inference from). Even so, it caused a stir and other researchers began studying the possibility. Study after study found no link between the vaccine and autism. Other problems with that original study caused the journal that published it to retract it.

If a parent’s child is vaccinated and eventually is diagnosed with autism. They are going to believe there is a link. They heard it, they’ve seen it, ergo it has to be so. You won’t be able to argue with that parent. Don’t even try. It is emotional. But the fact is there is no scientific evidence of a link. A lot of kids are diagnosed with autism. Most of those will have been vaccinated, because most kids are vaccinated. But whether they were vaccinated or not the same number of kids would get autism. That is what the science shows. There is no room for emotion in science. The facts are the facts. Just because Aunt Betty tells you not to do a certain procedure because she heard it makes your nose fall off . . .   that is not a reasonable basis to make medical decisions. If you have concerns, you should get the facts, the real facts. If you are getting your facts from social media, that’s a problem.

There is a reason why your great grandmother had 14 kids.  Most of them died young. Most of those that died, would not have died had they lived in the modern age of science and medicine. A lot of those deaths could have been prevented by vaccines that would have prevented most of the epidemics that killed people by the bucketful.

Scientists are sometimes wrong, and each human body is different (which is why people react differently to the same treatment). But when something has been tested and retested and retested, the odds that something bad is going to happen to you are extremely low.

So I suffered through my little bit of chills and fever and I am fine now. Does it mean that it is now impossible for me to get the disease for which I was vaccinated? No. There is still a risk, although it is a much smaller one now. Like I said, I would do it again. Weigh the odds. Do the math. Or (here’s an idea) just ask your doctor.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).


Link to Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, wh...

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this...

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up...