Different people have different
tastes. That’s what makes us all unique. If all writers wrote the same type of
story, literature would become quite boring. So I am going to discuss some of
the things I like to write and some of the things I don’t like to write. By the
way, this may or may not have anything to do with the things I like to read, or
the things I like to watch on TV or movies. There is obviously some overlap,
but it is not complete.
More than any other genre, I like to
write science fiction. I grew up on science fiction. I watched all the Scifi TV
shows as a kid, and some of the earliest adult books I ever read were science
fiction. There are a lot of sub-genres to science fiction: dystopian, space
opera, post-apocalyptic, hard science fiction, sociological etc. (and for the
moment we will set fantasy off as a separate genre from science fiction, though
they are related).
I have written some space opera, in fact
my novel, Star liner, is of that genre. I have also written short stories
of that type. Space opera is fun if not always the deepest form of fiction.
Some of the sub-genres that I have played around with have gray boundaries between them. I wrote a novel-sized
work that could be called dystopian but could also be called sociological
science fiction. I also wrote one quasi fantasy. I have also written straight
fiction. Straight fiction means it doesn’t fit in a genre. I did write a horror
story, though I suspect that is something that I am not particularly good at.
It didn’t seem all that scary to me, and if a horror story is not scary, it’s
not much of a horror story. One time I tried to write an erotic scene, and
quickly learned that this is not something I can do. I don’t have a problem
with erotic scenes in books, but they are not going to be coming from me. I
like reading hard science fiction, but again it is not something that I am
probably ever going to write (though I don’t want to completely close the door
on it.)
I usually don’t write
post-apocalyptic stories, but I am currently working on a short story in that
realm. The particular cataclysm that brought about the collapse of civilization
in this story is not explained because it is not important to the story. Some
people might cry foul to that but in my opinion, you shouldn’t clutter your
story with explanations that are not important to the plot.
I dabbled with the mystery genre in
my novel Star Liner, which was fun, but it is not a true mystery. True
mysteries have a tight framework and require much planning. Figuring out 'who done it' is the whole
reason for the story. Anyone who is reading Star Liner and paying attention
ought to be able to figure out what is going on fairly early. The mystery is
not the point of the story.
In short, I write whatever strikes my
fancy. An idea pops into my head and I go with it . . . or decide not to. Often
I write just for fun, just for me. This is as it should be for writers who are
not trying to make a living with their writing. If you are trying to make a
living with your writing, you have a whole different set of priorities. But
even so, I think you need to please yourself first.
(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an
ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online
sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out
soon).
Comments
Post a Comment