Skip to main content

An Exhibition of Exposition



Game of Thrones is a superb television series based on a superb set of books by George R.R. Martin. Contrary to popular perception, only the first book in the series is called “Game of Thrones.” The series as a whole is called “The Song of Ice and Fire.” Television and novels are two very different media, and so they have to tell their stories in different ways. The pacing is different. And with TV you have to be concerned about budget. I remember an interview with George R.R. Martin where he said he had written an episode for the TV version that showed all the bannermen of the Starks being called, each receiving a raven (call to arms) and getting their houses together and riding off to support the Starks. He said the producers came to him and told him that if they shot that scene as written, would use up all the money in the budget for the year.

One of the things that both media have to wrestle with is exposition: telling information the audience needs to know. It is backstory, or things that happened off screen which are important to understand the plot. These are also called info dumps. Think of the narration in the movie Dune. The narrator explains about the navigators and the spice and the planet Dune and the family houses.  It was not the most elegant info dump, just having someone tell the audience what they needed to know. It was necessary because without these facts, the movie-going audience would have no idea what was going on (except for the people who read the book, and if you are a movie producer, you definitely want more people to buy tickets than just the ones who read the book). Exposition is a problem for writers or screen writers, because it interrupts the flow and tends to be boring. There are absolutely no readers who skip ahead in the novel so they can get to the exposition part.

Some people do get more creative about exposition rather than just having someone explain stuff to you. It is best if you can do it in a way that does not call attention to itself. An expert writer can blend it into the action so that the reader will not even realize that he has been info dumped upon. The show-runners of “Game of Thrones” came up with a novel way of disgorging exposition to the audience. I guess they decided that if the audience had something interesting to look at while the show was dumping information on them, it might be more palatable. So one character could be giving us a monologue telling us backstory while two naked girls are having sex in the background. There is a term that came to be associated with this type of info dump, it is called “sexposition”. I don’t think this term existed before “Game of Thrones”. Let me be clear that this is a phenomenon of the television series. It is not to be found in George R. R. Martin’s books. He certainly has sex in his books, but he does not use this technique to info dump.

One has to wonder if “sexposition” is really a viable way to pass on critical information to the audience. I mean, who’s paying attention to the words? If what is being said is really that important, maybe you should not be distracting the viewers from the information that is being shared.

If you are a writer, the first question you should ask yourself is: does the audience really need to know this? If so, it is good to come up with creative ways to pass on information to the audience. Just make sure that you are not too clever for your own good. Blend the information in. Don’t distract from it. And the old maxim for writers applies: show, don’t tell.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more