Skip to main content

An Exhibition of Exposition



Game of Thrones is a superb television series based on a superb set of books by George R.R. Martin. Contrary to popular perception, only the first book in the series is called “Game of Thrones.” The series as a whole is called “The Song of Ice and Fire.” Television and novels are two very different media, and so they have to tell their stories in different ways. The pacing is different. And with TV you have to be concerned about budget. I remember an interview with George R.R. Martin where he said he had written an episode for the TV version that showed all the bannermen of the Starks being called, each receiving a raven (call to arms) and getting their houses together and riding off to support the Starks. He said the producers came to him and told him that if they shot that scene as written, would use up all the money in the budget for the year.

One of the things that both media have to wrestle with is exposition: telling information the audience needs to know. It is backstory, or things that happened off screen which are important to understand the plot. These are also called info dumps. Think of the narration in the movie Dune. The narrator explains about the navigators and the spice and the planet Dune and the family houses.  It was not the most elegant info dump, just having someone tell the audience what they needed to know. It was necessary because without these facts, the movie-going audience would have no idea what was going on (except for the people who read the book, and if you are a movie producer, you definitely want more people to buy tickets than just the ones who read the book). Exposition is a problem for writers or screen writers, because it interrupts the flow and tends to be boring. There are absolutely no readers who skip ahead in the novel so they can get to the exposition part.

Some people do get more creative about exposition rather than just having someone explain stuff to you. It is best if you can do it in a way that does not call attention to itself. An expert writer can blend it into the action so that the reader will not even realize that he has been info dumped upon. The show-runners of “Game of Thrones” came up with a novel way of disgorging exposition to the audience. I guess they decided that if the audience had something interesting to look at while the show was dumping information on them, it might be more palatable. So one character could be giving us a monologue telling us backstory while two naked girls are having sex in the background. There is a term that came to be associated with this type of info dump, it is called “sexposition”. I don’t think this term existed before “Game of Thrones”. Let me be clear that this is a phenomenon of the television series. It is not to be found in George R. R. Martin’s books. He certainly has sex in his books, but he does not use this technique to info dump.

One has to wonder if “sexposition” is really a viable way to pass on critical information to the audience. I mean, who’s paying attention to the words? If what is being said is really that important, maybe you should not be distracting the viewers from the information that is being shared.

If you are a writer, the first question you should ask yourself is: does the audience really need to know this? If so, it is good to come up with creative ways to pass on information to the audience. Just make sure that you are not too clever for your own good. Blend the information in. Don’t distract from it. And the old maxim for writers applies: show, don’t tell.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is tr

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up (or