Skip to main content

The Creature with no Brain!



A few years ago I saw the movie Lucy with Scarlett Johansen (I mean to say that she was in the movie. I did not go to the movie with her. We are not that close). Anyway the movie is a fun little romp. Bad things happen to Lucy, but she is able to overcome the villains and kick some glorious butt while she is doing it. Like I said, it is fun, and stylistically it is a beautiful film to watch. The problem is it is based on a premise that is a complete fallacy.

There is an experimental drug that Lucy is exposed to. This drug allows a person to access unused portions of their brain. Because, as we all know, we only use 10 percent of our brains right? Wrong. This is one of those myths that has been repeated so often that people think it is true. We do not know everything there is to know about the human brain. I am sure there are astounding discoveries yet to be made. But humans use all of their brains (with the possible exception of politicians). I should point out that Lucy is not the first film to use this same myth.

Where did this fallacy come from? Some have laid the blame on William James, a 19th century psychologist who stated that we only use a fraction of the brain’s potential. But he didn’t say 10%, and even if he had, not using the full potential is not the same thing as not using it. A more likely candidate is a neurosurgeon named Wilder Graves Penfield who did experiments on the human brain in the 1940’s. He found that only about 10% of the brain could be determined to produce observable results. In other words these were things that controlled the physical functions of the body, produced movement, or kept your heart beating etc. So that got picked up in the popular culture as “we only use 10% of our brains!” Really? What about thinking? What about memory storage? What about all the other myriad of things that would not produce “observable results.” (Of course it is not Penfield’s fault that people took it the wrong way). More recent technology like PET scans show that we do indeed use all of our brain, just perhaps not all at the same time.

When Hollywood does this, it kind of ruins the movie for me. I mean, if I had tried to write Lucy as a novel, it would have been rejected out of hand. Science fiction book publishers will tolerate speculative things, but they have to at least be plausible. Writing something that is based on junk science will get you a rejection faster than chocolate disappearing from my office potluck. It would be nice if Hollywood science fiction took the same care about plausibility that published science fiction did. It seems disrespectful to the viewers to pass on misinformation. To be fair, there are some film makers who do pay attention to the scientific details and try to make their story accurate, plausible, and realistic.  They tend to have scientific advisers working on the show. But others are just in it for a buck, or just don’t think it is important.

I think the believability of Lucy might have been salvaged if they had used a different explanation about what the drug was doing to her, though they may have had to tone down her “powers” somewhat and then they wouldn’t have been able to use all those cool special effects. I like Luc Besson as a filmmaker. He makes stylish and beautiful movies. But in this case a little bit more effort, research, and imagination, could have made a film that was just as visually stunning and compelling, without making it scientifically dead in the water.

Hollywood tends to do better when making movies out of Science fiction novels, because the novels themselves had to be vetted by Sci-fi publishers. So I will hope that filmmakers do more of that, or if they do make a movie from an original script, they at least get some professional help to make the science right.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an ebook through Copypastapublishing.com, Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iron Fist in a Velvet Glove

  Despite both of us having science backgrounds, my wife and I share a leaning toward the artistic, though we may express it in different ways. In her life, my wife has been a painter, a poet, a singer, an actor, and a fiction writer. Not to mention a mother. I don’t remember what precipitated this event, but my wife, my son, and I were at home in the front room. My wife was responding to something my son said. She said, “remember, you get half your brains from me. If it wasn’t for me, you’d be a complete idiot.” To which my son started howling with laughter and said to me,” I think you have just been insulted.” Sometimes I feel like Rodney Dangerfield. I get no respect. But that is not an uncommon state of affairs for fatherhood. When my son was going to middle school and high school, my wife was always the one to go in with him to get him registered for classes. One time she was unable to go and I had to be the one to get him registered. “Ugh,” he said. “why can’t Mama do i...
1 comment
Read more

Empathy

  Websters defines Empathy as: “the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another.” Empathy is what makes us human, though lord knows there are many humans who don’t seem to have any. A person without empathy is like a caveman, only concerned for himself. Selfish. It is a lack of community and by extension, a lack of the need for civilization. The person who lacks empathy can have a bit of community, but only with others exactly like himself. It seems like societies go through cycles of empathy and less empathy. Sometimes a single event can change the course of society. Prior to America’s involvement in WWII, the general feeling in America was not very empathetic. We had our own problems. We were still dealing with the lingering effects of the Great Depression, and had been for years. That kind of stress makes it hard to think of others. Hitler was slashing through Europe. He and his fol...
1 comment
Read more

A Deception

  I have a secret. I deceived my mother. Okay, it was like 50 years ago and she is gone now, but still . . .  I was generally a good boy. I did as I was told. My family lived a pretty strait-laced, middle-class, fairly conservative life. We were a G-rated family, well, until my older siblings broke the mold, but at this time, I was still in the mold. My friend Rich and I made a plan. Rich had asked me if I wanted to see Cabaret . He said he didn’t think much of Liza Minnelli, but he wouldn’t mind seeing her take her clothes off. We were like 13 years old and sex was ever-present on our minds as much as it was absent in our households. Cabaret was not rated R. It was rated PG. The ratings system has changed since that time. There was no PG-13; there was just the choice of G, PG, and R  (X was not an official rating).  Apparently the makers of Cabaret satisfied the ratings commission enough to escape an R rating, so it was PG.   There was therefore no law or ...
Post a Comment
Read more