Skip to main content

On the Fringes of TV



The series Fringe ran on Fox television from 2008 to 2013. It was a science fiction show about FBI agents investigating other worldly technology and events. When I tried explaining that to a friend he said, “so you mean like The X-Files?” And I am like No, it’s not like X-Files . . .  Okay I guess it does kind of sound like it. But it really was not like The X-Files. First of all it was different in tone. X-Files had a darker, atmospheric tone to it. To me it felt like Fringe was a bit more grounded in the real world. (If I can say that with a straight face about a show with parallel dimensions, teleportation, creatures who could stop or alter time, and a mad scientist who insisted a live cow reside in their Harvard laboratory . . .  but it felt more grounded to me.) Also Fringe felt like it was going somewhere. The mystery was slowly revealed and eventually resolved. With The X-Files (much as I loved the show) it always felt like we were falling down the rabbit hole each week. One mystery led to another. You just knew that Mulder was never going to find out what happened to his sister.

Fringe had a great cast with outstanding performances by John Noble, Lance Reddick, Anna Torv, and Joshua Jackson, among others (not to mention Leonard Nimoy). There was nothing trite or predictable about the show. The stories would veer into unexpected territory. In one episode, all of a sudden,  the series jumped ahead about 25 years with new characters, and I was thinking, okay, this is a one-off episode and they will eventually find a way to get back to our present day. But no, they stayed in that time frame to the end of the series, and they made it work.

Fringe was probably the last series TV show that I watched entirely on its broadcast dates. Due to the advent of streaming services and DVD’s, I now tend to watch shows whenever I want to and not on their actual air date. This allows you (after it is available) to binge-watch a show once you are hooked on it. Yeah, that is not necessarily a good thing, but the point is I don’t have to wait a week (or longer) between episodes, nor do I have to worry about missing an episode. The ability to stream shows was already becoming available during the run of Fringe, but I was hooked. I had to wait for each episode to come out.

That thing about not missing an episode is kind of a big deal. I remember when the first season of 24 came out and I watched every episode . . . except the last one. For some reason I was not able to be home that night and I missed the episode that resolved the whole season. There was no streaming back then. The only way to see a missed episode was to wait for summer reruns, or for it to come out on video (VHS probably). By the time it came out on video, the ending had been spoiled for me and I didn’t care anymore. It sort of ruined the whole season for me. The old days have their charm and sense of community (your friend might ask, “did you see what they did on Seinfeld last night?”). But I did miss at least one episode of Fringe because I wasn’t home on Friday(?) night.  I do prefer being able to watch my shows, in the proper order, and when I want to.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book through Amazon, or the other usual online sources. For those who like to turn physical pages, the paperback will be out soon).

 Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more