Skip to main content

Bringing back the Radio Shows


At some point in the late 1970’s on one of my treks through the science fiction section of my favorite book store I fleetingly noticed a book that had on the cover what appeared to be a cartoon planet with a mouth. The mouth was laughing and its tongue was sticking out. Obviously this book cover was trying to tell people that what was inside was hysterically funny. I thought it looked stupid. Anybody trying that hard to make you think they are funny, must be pretty lame. I bypassed the book. I was wrong.

The book was The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. It was a few years later when the book was forced upon me by a friend. It was not forced upon me in book form however. My former physics professor, who had become friends with my wife and I, produced some cassette tapes she had of the BBC radio show of the Hitchhiker’s Guide. It was wonderfully funny, reminiscent of Monty Python. My wife and I had the best time sitting there listening to those shows. Sometime later we even decided to throw a Hitchhikers party at that professor’s house: come as your favorite character (My wife and I came as a sperm whale and a bowl of petunias. I was the whale).

The story unfolding from the radio show was not only entertaining, but it made me realize how much we have missed out by not having radio dramas in this country. Television killed the radio shows in America, but the BBC still produced them, and now, many years later, that form of entertainment is making a comeback with the advent of the podcast. Audio dramas were/are their own unique art form that deserve a place in the pantheon of creative endeavors. I just recently listened to a science fiction podcast series called Exoplanetary that was quite inventive. But I digress . . .

The radio show got me to finally read the book series, which I enjoyed as much as the radio series. Later I found a British television series of the Hitchhikers Guide. That was not quite as good as the earlier forms, for one thing because it was extremely low-budget, and for another because the images conjured in my head from the books or radio show were just better than what I was watching. In this respect I think radio (or podcast) is a similar experience to reading a book, because the information you are taking in has to be supplemented by your own imagination. Whereas watching something on TV or at the movies is a more passive experience. All the information is provided for you. You just have to sit back and take it in. Instead of my imagination’s version of what that space ship looks like, we get fed the director’s vision of it. Instead of my imagination’s vision of what the heroine looks like, we get the casting director’s vision.

A number of years later, the movie version of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy came out. This was no low budget thing like the TV series had been. This had a great cast and big budget special effects. Despite the fact that there were some genuine laughs in it, the movie overall fell kind of flat for me. See, movies are different than books in other ways too. When making a movie from a book you have to decide what to leave out because you cannot possibly fit it all in there. Also, Movies have different pacing requirements than books. To get the same emotional effect on the audience as a book, a movie may have to add new material or change it to make it work. It is a tricky thing to get right.

So if you want to experience The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy the way it was meant to be experienced, buy the books, or listen to the radio show.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book or paperback through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)


Star Liner

Comments

  1. Someone just shared this with me. Original Hitchhikers Guide music:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ufdz0BbEjc&feature=youtu.be


    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, wh...

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up...

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...