At some point in the late 1970’s on one
of my treks through the science fiction section of my favorite book store I
fleetingly noticed a book that had on the cover what appeared to be a cartoon planet
with a mouth. The mouth was laughing and its tongue was sticking out. Obviously
this book cover was trying to tell people that what was inside was hysterically
funny. I thought it looked stupid. Anybody trying that hard to make you think
they are funny, must be pretty lame. I bypassed the book. I was wrong.
The book was The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. It was a few
years later when the book was forced upon me by a friend. It was not forced
upon me in book form however. My former physics professor, who had become
friends with my wife and I, produced some cassette tapes she had of the BBC
radio show of the Hitchhiker’s Guide. It was wonderfully funny, reminiscent of
Monty Python. My wife and I had the best time sitting there listening to those
shows. Sometime later we even decided to throw a Hitchhikers party at that
professor’s house: come as your favorite character (My wife and I came as a
sperm whale and a bowl of petunias. I was the whale).
The story unfolding from the radio
show was not only entertaining, but it made me realize how much we have missed
out by not having radio dramas in this country. Television killed the radio
shows in America, but the BBC still produced them, and now, many years later,
that form of entertainment is making a comeback with the advent of the podcast.
Audio dramas were/are their own unique art form that deserve a place in the
pantheon of creative endeavors. I just recently listened to a science fiction podcast
series called Exoplanetary that was
quite inventive. But I digress . . .
The radio show got me to finally read
the book series, which I enjoyed as much as the radio series. Later I found a British
television series of the Hitchhikers Guide. That was not quite as good as the
earlier forms, for one thing because it was extremely low-budget, and for
another because the images conjured in my head from the books or radio show
were just better than what I was watching. In this respect I think radio (or
podcast) is a similar experience to reading a book, because the information you
are taking in has to be supplemented by your own imagination. Whereas watching
something on TV or at the movies is a more passive experience. All the
information is provided for you. You just have to sit back and take it in. Instead
of my imagination’s version of what that space ship looks like, we get fed the
director’s vision of it. Instead of my imagination’s vision of what the heroine
looks like, we get the casting director’s vision.
A number of years later, the movie
version of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the
Galaxy came out. This was no low budget thing like the TV series had been.
This had a great cast and big budget special effects. Despite the fact that
there were some genuine laughs in it, the movie overall fell kind of flat for
me. See, movies are different than books in other ways too. When making a movie
from a book you have to decide what to leave out because you cannot possibly
fit it all in there. Also, Movies have different pacing requirements than
books. To get the same emotional effect on the audience as a book, a movie may
have to add new material or change it to make it work. It is a tricky thing to
get right.
So if you want to experience The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy the
way it was meant to be experienced, buy the books, or listen to the radio show.
(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book
or paperback through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)
Star Liner
Someone just shared this with me. Original Hitchhikers Guide music:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ufdz0BbEjc&feature=youtu.be