Skip to main content

Bringing back the Radio Shows


At some point in the late 1970’s on one of my treks through the science fiction section of my favorite book store I fleetingly noticed a book that had on the cover what appeared to be a cartoon planet with a mouth. The mouth was laughing and its tongue was sticking out. Obviously this book cover was trying to tell people that what was inside was hysterically funny. I thought it looked stupid. Anybody trying that hard to make you think they are funny, must be pretty lame. I bypassed the book. I was wrong.

The book was The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. It was a few years later when the book was forced upon me by a friend. It was not forced upon me in book form however. My former physics professor, who had become friends with my wife and I, produced some cassette tapes she had of the BBC radio show of the Hitchhiker’s Guide. It was wonderfully funny, reminiscent of Monty Python. My wife and I had the best time sitting there listening to those shows. Sometime later we even decided to throw a Hitchhikers party at that professor’s house: come as your favorite character (My wife and I came as a sperm whale and a bowl of petunias. I was the whale).

The story unfolding from the radio show was not only entertaining, but it made me realize how much we have missed out by not having radio dramas in this country. Television killed the radio shows in America, but the BBC still produced them, and now, many years later, that form of entertainment is making a comeback with the advent of the podcast. Audio dramas were/are their own unique art form that deserve a place in the pantheon of creative endeavors. I just recently listened to a science fiction podcast series called Exoplanetary that was quite inventive. But I digress . . .

The radio show got me to finally read the book series, which I enjoyed as much as the radio series. Later I found a British television series of the Hitchhikers Guide. That was not quite as good as the earlier forms, for one thing because it was extremely low-budget, and for another because the images conjured in my head from the books or radio show were just better than what I was watching. In this respect I think radio (or podcast) is a similar experience to reading a book, because the information you are taking in has to be supplemented by your own imagination. Whereas watching something on TV or at the movies is a more passive experience. All the information is provided for you. You just have to sit back and take it in. Instead of my imagination’s version of what that space ship looks like, we get fed the director’s vision of it. Instead of my imagination’s vision of what the heroine looks like, we get the casting director’s vision.

A number of years later, the movie version of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy came out. This was no low budget thing like the TV series had been. This had a great cast and big budget special effects. Despite the fact that there were some genuine laughs in it, the movie overall fell kind of flat for me. See, movies are different than books in other ways too. When making a movie from a book you have to decide what to leave out because you cannot possibly fit it all in there. Also, Movies have different pacing requirements than books. To get the same emotional effect on the audience as a book, a movie may have to add new material or change it to make it work. It is a tricky thing to get right.

So if you want to experience The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy the way it was meant to be experienced, buy the books, or listen to the radio show.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book or paperback through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)


Star Liner

Comments

  1. Someone just shared this with me. Original Hitchhikers Guide music:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ufdz0BbEjc&feature=youtu.be


    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t