Skip to main content

Bringing back the Radio Shows


At some point in the late 1970’s on one of my treks through the science fiction section of my favorite book store I fleetingly noticed a book that had on the cover what appeared to be a cartoon planet with a mouth. The mouth was laughing and its tongue was sticking out. Obviously this book cover was trying to tell people that what was inside was hysterically funny. I thought it looked stupid. Anybody trying that hard to make you think they are funny, must be pretty lame. I bypassed the book. I was wrong.

The book was The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. It was a few years later when the book was forced upon me by a friend. It was not forced upon me in book form however. My former physics professor, who had become friends with my wife and I, produced some cassette tapes she had of the BBC radio show of the Hitchhiker’s Guide. It was wonderfully funny, reminiscent of Monty Python. My wife and I had the best time sitting there listening to those shows. Sometime later we even decided to throw a Hitchhikers party at that professor’s house: come as your favorite character (My wife and I came as a sperm whale and a bowl of petunias. I was the whale).

The story unfolding from the radio show was not only entertaining, but it made me realize how much we have missed out by not having radio dramas in this country. Television killed the radio shows in America, but the BBC still produced them, and now, many years later, that form of entertainment is making a comeback with the advent of the podcast. Audio dramas were/are their own unique art form that deserve a place in the pantheon of creative endeavors. I just recently listened to a science fiction podcast series called Exoplanetary that was quite inventive. But I digress . . .

The radio show got me to finally read the book series, which I enjoyed as much as the radio series. Later I found a British television series of the Hitchhikers Guide. That was not quite as good as the earlier forms, for one thing because it was extremely low-budget, and for another because the images conjured in my head from the books or radio show were just better than what I was watching. In this respect I think radio (or podcast) is a similar experience to reading a book, because the information you are taking in has to be supplemented by your own imagination. Whereas watching something on TV or at the movies is a more passive experience. All the information is provided for you. You just have to sit back and take it in. Instead of my imagination’s version of what that space ship looks like, we get fed the director’s vision of it. Instead of my imagination’s vision of what the heroine looks like, we get the casting director’s vision.

A number of years later, the movie version of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy came out. This was no low budget thing like the TV series had been. This had a great cast and big budget special effects. Despite the fact that there were some genuine laughs in it, the movie overall fell kind of flat for me. See, movies are different than books in other ways too. When making a movie from a book you have to decide what to leave out because you cannot possibly fit it all in there. Also, Movies have different pacing requirements than books. To get the same emotional effect on the audience as a book, a movie may have to add new material or change it to make it work. It is a tricky thing to get right.

So if you want to experience The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy the way it was meant to be experienced, buy the books, or listen to the radio show.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book or paperback through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)


Star Liner

Comments

  1. Someone just shared this with me. Original Hitchhikers Guide music:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ufdz0BbEjc&feature=youtu.be


    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...