Skip to main content

Star Trek TOS


                                       

I remember my brother and sister talking about a new science fiction show that was going to premier on television that night. I don’t know how they heard of it or how much buzz there was about it before it aired. Somehow they had heard about it and they infected me even though my mother said that she didn’t think I should be watching one of those weirdo shows (this is how she described pretty much all science fiction.)  I was seven years old at the time.  I liked science fiction. Some kids my age liked westerns, some liked cop shows, some liked war shows, and some liked sports. I liked Science fiction. It spoke to me. Maybe I was more open to speculative ideas, maybe I liked science itself more than the average kid, or maybe I just liked cool ray guns and special effects. I watched cartoons like Jonny Quest and Space Ghost, and live action series like Lost in Space and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. So I was determined to see this new show.

The new show was called Star Trek (I did not know what the word ‘trek’ meant. Remember I was seven. And yes you can look up the original air date and figure out my age. Good for you). That first episode was called “The Man Trap.” It turned out not to be one of the best episodes, but not one of the worst either. In any case as I started watching it, I could see that this was different from anything I had ever seen before. There was an alien with pointed ears on the command staff of the Enterprise, yet he was not scary. He seemed quite reasonable. He was kind of different from the others on the ship. Logic and science ruled his world. Hey I liked science; I could identify with him. The episode was mostly about Dr. McCoy and his ex-girlfriend, though as we discover, it is not really his ex-girlfriend but an alien. As the episode progressed a sense of foreboding grew in me as crewmen began to die. When the monster finally showed itself, it was a bit much for my seven year-old sensibilities. I . . . had to go to the bathroom. I wasn’t fooling my siblings. They knew I left the room because I was scared. I stayed at the edge of the doorway, listening until it was safe to return. I did not see every episode of that first run, but after the show went into syndication, I saw them all, over and over again. I was not alone. Star Trek’s popularity continued to grow after it was cancelled. 

Why was Star Trek so popular (eventually)? Why did it produce numerous spin-off shows and many movies? As I said, there was something different about it. It felt more real, more like an adult show than other things on TV at the time. It certainly bore little resemblance to Lost in Space. There are those of us for whom Star Trek TOS (the original series) is still the king of the Star Trek brand. For me it is probably because I was there at the beginning. I was impacted by how this series was so different. The original had its flaws. There was occasional scenery chewing, and a few of the plotlines were cringingly bad. But the overarching continuity and he characters made up for it. We cared what happened to these characters. They got into our heads and hearts. To me, the later series’, even though they had great actors (like Patrick Stewart) and better special effects, the stories did not seem quite as good. It was too sanitized, too politically correct. I think it was trying to be too many things for too many people. I did not care about the new characters as much. Even though they got into peril and some of them even died, it never felt as though these characters had as much to lose as the original ones did. That is just another way of saying I was not as invested in the new characters.

Whether you like one particular series over another is probably determined by where you were in your stage of development when you first saw it. For me, I was there in 1966 when everything changed.  

(My novel Star Liner, is now available as an e-book or paperback through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more