We were at Edinburgh Castle following
a long walk up the hill. Back in the day, it made sense for castles to be on
top of hills. It helped make them easily defendable. This is a common war
strategy; you go for the high ground. Of course defending against the invading
English horde is no longer a concern. At this point the castle’s main function
is tourism and speaking as a tourist I can say, the hill’s pretty steep. We
made a circuit around the rocky crenulations and saw the sights of the city as
well as the features of the castle. Near the top, we saw a long line to get
into see the Scottish Crown Jewels and we opted not to stand in line, but it
got me to thinking about crown jewels in general, be they Scottish, British, or
any other crown. I got to thinking about the value of the crown jewels. A
thought popped into my head that crown jewels are essentially valueless. I
don’t mean to say priceless, which of course they are, but I really mean they
have no value (no monetary value). Why? Because nobody is ever going to sell
them. If they are not and never will be on the market, then they have no
monetary value. Of course they have other types of value, artistic and
historic, but putting a price on them is pointless.
In fact, it could be argued that they
have negative value as you have to pay a lot in security costs to keep them
safe. Because even if it has no monetary value to the government, it might have
monetary value to a thief, if he could sell them. There again the thief might
not be able to sell them because they would be too “hot”. The thief might have
to melt down and sell the raw gold and stones by themselves. It would be a
travesty against history and the thief might get only a small fraction of what
the intact jewels might fetch on a legitimate market. But as I said there is no
legitimate market where the jewels would ever be sold so he would probably take
what he could get. Then again, they were selling tickets to see them, so I
suppose security costs could be offset by admission revenue so, meh, call it even.
We ascribe the word ‘priceless’ to
things that are so ridiculously valuable that no one could ever afford them, or
to things that have such a high artistic, cultural, emotional, or historical
value, that it becomes insulting to try to put a dollar value on them. What is
the value of the Mona Lisa? Priceless. It is arguably the most famous piece of
art in the world, but why? Is it better than the best works of Raphael,
Michelangelo, Titian, Gainsborough, Van Dyke, Cezanne, or Picasso? Some might say
yes. I would argue, no. It is a wonderful artistic accomplishment yes, but so
are the others, and as I have said before, art is subjective. It is entirely in
the eye of the beholder. I think the Mona Lisa is famous . . . for being
famous.
Occasionally a work by a famous
artist is sold at auction. We are astounded at the price some buyers are
willing to pay. But most famous works of art, like crown jewels, will never be
sold. If they are never going to be on the market, do they have a monetary
value? One of those philosophical questions I guess.
(My novel Star Liner, is now available in
paperback or as an e-book through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)
Comments
Post a Comment