Skip to main content

Priceless




We were at Edinburgh Castle following a long walk up the hill. Back in the day, it made sense for castles to be on top of hills. It helped make them easily defendable. This is a common war strategy; you go for the high ground. Of course defending against the invading English horde is no longer a concern. At this point the castle’s main function is tourism and speaking as a tourist I can say, the hill’s pretty steep. We made a circuit around the rocky crenulations and saw the sights of the city as well as the features of the castle. Near the top, we saw a long line to get into see the Scottish Crown Jewels and we opted not to stand in line, but it got me to thinking about crown jewels in general, be they Scottish, British, or any other crown. I got to thinking about the value of the crown jewels. A thought popped into my head that crown jewels are essentially valueless. I don’t mean to say priceless, which of course they are, but I really mean they have no value (no monetary value). Why? Because nobody is ever going to sell them. If they are not and never will be on the market, then they have no monetary value. Of course they have other types of value, artistic and historic, but putting a price on them is pointless.
 
In fact, it could be argued that they have negative value as you have to pay a lot in security costs to keep them safe. Because even if it has no monetary value to the government, it might have monetary value to a thief, if he could sell them. There again the thief might not be able to sell them because they would be too “hot”. The thief might have to melt down and sell the raw gold and stones by themselves. It would be a travesty against history and the thief might get only a small fraction of what the intact jewels might fetch on a legitimate market. But as I said there is no legitimate market where the jewels would ever be sold so he would probably take what he could get. Then again, they were selling tickets to see them, so I suppose security costs could be offset by  admission revenue so, meh, call it even.

We ascribe the word ‘priceless’ to things that are so ridiculously valuable that no one could ever afford them, or to things that have such a high artistic, cultural, emotional, or historical value, that it becomes insulting to try to put a dollar value on them. What is the value of the Mona Lisa? Priceless. It is arguably the most famous piece of art in the world, but why? Is it better than the best works of Raphael, Michelangelo, Titian, Gainsborough, Van Dyke, Cezanne, or Picasso? Some might say yes. I would argue, no. It is a wonderful artistic accomplishment yes, but so are the others, and as I have said before, art is subjective. It is entirely in the eye of the beholder. I think the Mona Lisa is famous . . . for being famous.

Occasionally a work by a famous artist is sold at auction. We are astounded at the price some buyers are willing to pay. But most famous works of art, like crown jewels, will never be sold. If they are never going to be on the market, do they have a monetary value? One of those philosophical questions I guess.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more