Skip to main content

James T. Kirk: A Character Study



There once was a starship captain named James Kirk. I am talking about the James Kirk whose exploits were recorded in the historical documents that aired on television between 1966 and 1968.  Not only was he the “captain” of the USS Enterprise (anyone of any rank who commands a ship is called by the honorary title “captain”) but his rank was actually Captain. That is to say, one notch below Admiral (two notches if you count the rank of Commodore which was only used in one or two episodes and was not well defined). In any event, he was a high ranking officer and in command of a formidable starship. And there was no question who was in command of the ship. His crew was loyal and followed his orders without question (well except when he was acting loopy, then they might actually give a questioning look).

This captain and his crew were assigned a five year mission to explore new worlds. One might wonder why a military vessel with all those weapons was given the duty of peaceful exploration, but hey, I guess it was a dangerous galaxy. But also,  if they were really exploring new worlds out there, why were they constantly being called back for more mundane tasks in the known Federation territory, things like ferrying supplies to a colony in need, answering distress calls, finding out why the Federation had lost contact with an colony. If the Enterprise were really out there exploring the fringes of the galaxy, wouldn’t there be other ships closer to do these things? But I digress. I guess we will just chalk it up to how amazingly efficient that warp drive was.

So what kind of fellow was this James Kirk? By all accounts, he was an extremely intelligent man. In a tight situation, he usually knew the right thing to say and do. It was almost as if he had a team of writers crafting his words for him. He could out-think (or at least hold his own) against beings or artificial intelligences that were supposedly far superior to humans. Said beings usually turned out to have some fatal flaw that he or his team could find and exploit.

He was a passionate man, sometimes letting his emotions getting the best of him. He was passionate in his friendships, passionate in his anger, and passionate in his love life. In some ways I liken him to James Bond in that he had many lovers (but perhaps only one love, which may have scarred him against commitment). He was a man who seemed to have a girl in every port. He is the stereotypical sailor in this regard. Yet we don’t see this kind of behavior from the other characters on the show. While it is entertaining seeing Kirk woo all females of any species throughout the galaxy, it does point out a flaw in his character that could be and would be exploited. There is also a rather sexist line that Kirk says to Spock in one episode,

“Mr. Spock the women on your planet are logical. That’s the only planet in this galaxy that can make that claim.”

For all the high ideals and racial equality to be found in the Federation. The one place where the 23rd century seems to have fallen short was in gender equality. Yes Uhura was supposedly 4th in line of command on the Enterprise. But we never saw any high ranking Star Fleet command officers who were women. As we learned from the final episode of Star Trek, and Kirk’s former lover Janice Lester, women were not allowed to be ship’s captains. Huh? Well perhaps having Uhura was as far as Gene Roddenberry could push it. The show was after all a product of its time.

Despite all this, Kirk inspired fierce loyalty in his crew. A number of years ago a study was done on airline pilots and one of the conclusions of the study was summed up by saying “we need more pilots like Captain Picard, not like Captain Kirk, meaning they wanted captains who worked well with others, who consulted with and worked with their crew. Not someone who issued an order and said ‘my way or the highway’. And in fact, that may be the kind of captain needed on an airliner, but for my money, if I am every about to go into battle against vastly superior aliens, give me Captain Kirk.

(My novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon, or the other usual online sources)

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more