Skip to main content

Staying Power




Why is it that some artistic endeavors survive the test of time better than others? If you have been on this Earth for more than thirty years, this is probably something that you have experienced first-hand. Music, movies, or TV shows that seemed great when you were a kid, make you cringe now. You can’t blame it all on the fact that the show or music was aimed at a young audience and you are an adult now. No, some of it just didn’t age well.

Sometimes it can be blamed on changing cultural sensibilities. James Bond’s quasi-raping of Pussy Galore doesn’t go over as well today as it did in 1965. In fact, the early James Bond films had a lot of moments like that. I truly do cringe when I see that now, and I know I didn’t the first time I saw it. The later James Bond films still objectified women, but at least the rapeyness was gone. Similarly, minority stereotypes are a tough sell to today’s audience, like dumbed down black servants that were played for comic relief in 1940’s movies. Such a scene ruins the movie for a modern viewer. The world has changed.

I have always been a fan of science fiction. Science fiction on screen usually requires special effects. Special effects have evolved greatly over the past 70 years. From wobbly models of rockets dangling on wires to stop motion animation of dinosaurs, to modern CGI: special effects help paint the picture. When I was younger, special effects were part of the attraction. We gauged how good a show was by how good the effects were (things blowing up were always a special treat). There is no question that old movies with cheesy special effects just look silly today. But good believable special effects were no guarantee that the show was going to age well. Example: Every Irwin Allen TV show from the 1960’s:   Lost in Space, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, The Time Tunnel, Land of the Giants. In these shows the production design and special effects were excellent and hold up well even today. It is not the effects that are the problem, it is the scripts. Some of the characters are just too dumb to be believed. Scientist say things that no scientist would ever say. Plus, they all tend to follow a formula. Someone told me once that if Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea started at 7:30, he could guarantee that there would be an electrical fire at 7:35.

In the music world, I think people just get tired of a form or style after a while. 1950’s pop songs were resplendent with piano chords that would repeat continuously throughout the song. In the 1960’s Surfin’ music was king for a while. The 1970’s had disco. All of these things (and more) wore out their welcome.

It is easier to figure out why certain pieces or performances have not aged well, than it is to figure out why some have aged well. Why are Shakespeare’s plays still popular 400 years after his death when almost all of his contemporaries and almost all of the playwrights that followed for the next 300 years have been nearly forgotten? Why can Unchained Melody by the Righteous Brothers, still pack the same emotional punch it did when it was recorded in 1965? Why does 2001: A Space Odyssey look and feel like it could have been made last year? The simple answer is: quality. They were able to touch the human psyche in a way that most cannot. But how to measure, quantify or predict quality is as elusive as
“. . . the sweet sound
That breathes upon a bank of violets,
Stealing and giving odor . . .”
What makes an artistic endeavor good, as opposed to one that is simply popular for the moment, I leave to the philosophers.
“O time, thou must untangle this, not I.
It is too hard a knot for me to untie.”

Thank you to Mr. Shakespeare for the use of his quotes that have stood the test of time.

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more