Skip to main content

Staying Power




Why is it that some artistic endeavors survive the test of time better than others? If you have been on this Earth for more than thirty years, this is probably something that you have experienced first-hand. Music, movies, or TV shows that seemed great when you were a kid, make you cringe now. You can’t blame it all on the fact that the show or music was aimed at a young audience and you are an adult now. No, some of it just didn’t age well.

Sometimes it can be blamed on changing cultural sensibilities. James Bond’s quasi-raping of Pussy Galore doesn’t go over as well today as it did in 1965. In fact, the early James Bond films had a lot of moments like that. I truly do cringe when I see that now, and I know I didn’t the first time I saw it. The later James Bond films still objectified women, but at least the rapeyness was gone. Similarly, minority stereotypes are a tough sell to today’s audience, like dumbed down black servants that were played for comic relief in 1940’s movies. Such a scene ruins the movie for a modern viewer. The world has changed.

I have always been a fan of science fiction. Science fiction on screen usually requires special effects. Special effects have evolved greatly over the past 70 years. From wobbly models of rockets dangling on wires to stop motion animation of dinosaurs, to modern CGI: special effects help paint the picture. When I was younger, special effects were part of the attraction. We gauged how good a show was by how good the effects were (things blowing up were always a special treat). There is no question that old movies with cheesy special effects just look silly today. But good believable special effects were no guarantee that the show was going to age well. Example: Every Irwin Allen TV show from the 1960’s:   Lost in Space, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, The Time Tunnel, Land of the Giants. In these shows the production design and special effects were excellent and hold up well even today. It is not the effects that are the problem, it is the scripts. Some of the characters are just too dumb to be believed. Scientist say things that no scientist would ever say. Plus, they all tend to follow a formula. Someone told me once that if Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea started at 7:30, he could guarantee that there would be an electrical fire at 7:35.

In the music world, I think people just get tired of a form or style after a while. 1950’s pop songs were resplendent with piano chords that would repeat continuously throughout the song. In the 1960’s Surfin’ music was king for a while. The 1970’s had disco. All of these things (and more) wore out their welcome.

It is easier to figure out why certain pieces or performances have not aged well, than it is to figure out why some have aged well. Why are Shakespeare’s plays still popular 400 years after his death when almost all of his contemporaries and almost all of the playwrights that followed for the next 300 years have been nearly forgotten? Why can Unchained Melody by the Righteous Brothers, still pack the same emotional punch it did when it was recorded in 1965? Why does 2001: A Space Odyssey look and feel like it could have been made last year? The simple answer is: quality. They were able to touch the human psyche in a way that most cannot. But how to measure, quantify or predict quality is as elusive as
“. . . the sweet sound
That breathes upon a bank of violets,
Stealing and giving odor . . .”
What makes an artistic endeavor good, as opposed to one that is simply popular for the moment, I leave to the philosophers.
“O time, thou must untangle this, not I.
It is too hard a knot for me to untie.”

Thank you to Mr. Shakespeare for the use of his quotes that have stood the test of time.

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more