Skip to main content

This Is How You Lose the Time War (a review)




The pandemic of 2020 has been a terrible blow to many, many people. I don’t have to enumerate the ways. Everyone has been affected in one way or another. And yet, if you look for silver linings in bad times, you can usually find some. They in no way, make up for the bad aspects of pandemic, but you need to appreciate the little tokens that chance throws your way. A case in point: I am a lover of science fiction, but have never made it to (nor probably ever will make it to) the World Science Fiction Convention (WorldCon) to see the Hugo Awards. This year it was set for New Zealand, and much as I would have like to have seen it, New Zealand was just never going to be in the cards for me. But because of Covid-19, The Hugo Awards were live streamed this year. I actually got to watch it live and hear acceptance speeches and everything. There were a few technical glitches, but that is to be expected, and they didn’t detract from the overall presentations.

This year’s winner for Best Novella was This Is How You Lose the Time War, by Amal El-Mohtar and Max Gladstone. I had heard some buzz about this story previously, so I ordered it from our library (which has fortunately found ways to get books to patrons in spite of the pandemic!) As the title suggest, there is a war going on for the control of Time. Our two main characters are Red, and Blue. They are enemies. Each one fights for their respective side in the war, altering timelines to try to achieve whatever end their commanders are trying to achieve. Red works for the side called The Agency, while blue works for Garden. Cause and effect; effect and cause. They manipulate. They frame. They kill. Shunting the strands of time for their respective and mysterious ends.

They are both very good at their jobs, in fact they may be the best weapons that each side has to offer. Each sees the other side as evil, the same way that a child born in 1950’s America would have seen the Soviet Union as evil, or a child born in the Soviet Union would have seen America as evil. It is the culture that they know. Red and Blue start out with unquestioned loyalty for their respective sides. Nonetheless, somehow these two rival agents strike up a correspondence. Much of the book is told in an epistolary fashion, with each character depositing a cleverly hidden and coded letter for the other to read and destroy.

In some ways it reminded me of Enemy Mine by Barry B. Longyear, which coincidentally, also won the Hugo for Best Novella (1980). There are significant differences in the two novellas, but in both cases, we are rooting for the two antagonists, and we are rooting for their relationship to develop. Red and Blue both have upbringings that are so foreign to our way of thinking that it is difficult to grasp, but the way they were raised explains and defines their characters. These two super time spies are bizarrely alien to us, to the point that we wonder if they are still human.  And yet, they could teach us all a thing or two about what it means to be human.  As my theater friend is fond of saying: this one has all the feels.

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).


Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more