Skip to main content

Coincidences in Science

 



Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz both invented the application of mathematics known as calculus. When I say they both did, I don’t mean to imply they worked on it together. They both independently invented calculus. Newton began working on calculus in 1666 but didn’t publish anything about it until 1693. Leibniz began working on it in 1674 but didn’t publish anything about it until 1684. Most people today believe that the two men developed their ideas separately.

Charles Darwin had been working on his theory of evolution for years. He developed the theory in the 1830s but knew it would be controversial so he didn’t tell anyone about it and continued to gather evidence to support his theory. In 1858 Alfred Russell Wallace, an acquaintance of Darwin, sent Darwin a letter outlining a theory of evolution that Russell had come up with. Darwin was shocked. Reportedly some passages were almost word for word the same as Darwin’s. The two men had come up with the same idea.

The reason these things happen are because scientific hypotheses are based on previous knowledge and the latest methods. As methods and equipment evolve and data increases, all scientists who have access to that data could reasonably come to a similar conclusion. Indeed, Newton and Leibniz built on the work of Kepler, Descartes, Pascal, and many others.

Priority is an important concept in science. Priority means: who thought of it first? Who gets the credit? There can be controversy when there are competing claims for a discovery. It can be difficult to determine when each of the competing scientists is responsible for discovering a portion of the puzzle. Both Giovanni Battista Grassi and Ronald Ross discovered important facts about the life cycle of the malarial parasites. There was an ugly fight over who should win the 1902 Nobel prize in Medicine. The Nobel committee was originally going to give it to both scientists, but then Ross engaged in a discrediting campaign against Grassi. He won (scientists can be just as petty and mean-spirited as the rest of us). And though Newton himself, at least initially, did not have a problem sharing the credit for calculus with Leibniz; his friends did, and started a campaign to discredit Leibniz. On the other hand, Darwin and Russell shared in the announcement about evolution, and neither man made a claim of theft from the other.

Sometimes there is a discovery that everyone knows is out there ripe for the plucking, but no one has found it yet. By 1953 many scientists were trying to discover the structure of DNA. Lots of pieces of the puzzle had been published. They all knew what components went into DNA, just not how it was put together. James Watson and Francis Crick came up with a model that worked, that ticked all the boxes. They along with Maurice Wilkins eventually shared the Nobel prize for the discovery. But that discovery might just as easily have been made by Rosalind Franklin, Erwin Chargaff, Linus Pauling, or others. Or it is even possible that two different groups might have come up with the same answer at the same time. It just happened that Watson and Crick were the ones with the eureka moment. Not that scholarship and hard work aren't involved, but luck also plays a part. 

Coincidental discoveries may seem odd. They might seem like they should be the basis for a conspiracy theory. But when you look at the way science is done; it is not odd at all.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iron Fist in a Velvet Glove

  Despite both of us having science backgrounds, my wife and I share a leaning toward the artistic, though we may express it in different ways. In her life, my wife has been a painter, a poet, a singer, an actor, and a fiction writer. Not to mention a mother. I don’t remember what precipitated this event, but my wife, my son, and I were at home in the front room. My wife was responding to something my son said. She said, “remember, you get half your brains from me. If it wasn’t for me, you’d be a complete idiot.” To which my son started howling with laughter and said to me,” I think you have just been insulted.” Sometimes I feel like Rodney Dangerfield. I get no respect. But that is not an uncommon state of affairs for fatherhood. When my son was going to middle school and high school, my wife was always the one to go in with him to get him registered for classes. One time she was unable to go and I had to be the one to get him registered. “Ugh,” he said. “why can’t Mama do i...
1 comment
Read more

Empathy

  Websters defines Empathy as: “the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another.” Empathy is what makes us human, though lord knows there are many humans who don’t seem to have any. A person without empathy is like a caveman, only concerned for himself. Selfish. It is a lack of community and by extension, a lack of the need for civilization. The person who lacks empathy can have a bit of community, but only with others exactly like himself. It seems like societies go through cycles of empathy and less empathy. Sometimes a single event can change the course of society. Prior to America’s involvement in WWII, the general feeling in America was not very empathetic. We had our own problems. We were still dealing with the lingering effects of the Great Depression, and had been for years. That kind of stress makes it hard to think of others. Hitler was slashing through Europe. He and his fol...
1 comment
Read more

A Deception

  I have a secret. I deceived my mother. Okay, it was like 50 years ago and she is gone now, but still . . .  I was generally a good boy. I did as I was told. My family lived a pretty strait-laced, middle-class, fairly conservative life. We were a G-rated family, well, until my older siblings broke the mold, but at this time, I was still in the mold. My friend Rich and I made a plan. Rich had asked me if I wanted to see Cabaret . He said he didn’t think much of Liza Minnelli, but he wouldn’t mind seeing her take her clothes off. We were like 13 years old and sex was ever-present on our minds as much as it was absent in our households. Cabaret was not rated R. It was rated PG. The ratings system has changed since that time. There was no PG-13; there was just the choice of G, PG, and R  (X was not an official rating).  Apparently the makers of Cabaret satisfied the ratings commission enough to escape an R rating, so it was PG.   There was therefore no law or ...
Post a Comment
Read more