Skip to main content

The Big Question

 


Just about every culture that has ever existed on Earth has developed some kind of religion. Is this in itself evidence that God exists? Or is this just a quirk of the human mind? 

As human beings, we struggle with the big questions of life: why are we here etc. Some people look for answers in religion. Some look for answers in philosophy. Some look for answers in science. No one has ever come up with a universal answer, an answer that works for everyone. Why not? If there was one right answer, everyone should be able to recognize it. The rightness of it ought to be self-evident. There would be no need for competing religions or philosophies. If the answer was true, it ought to be as obvious as a volcano.

Maybe we struggle to find the answer because we are not very good at asking the question. Questions like: “why are we here?” Or “What’s it all about?” are really pretty vague and open-ended aren’t they? What specifically are you asking?  You might as well be asking “what’s the answer to the big question?” No wonder no one has ever answered them to everyone’s satisfaction.

Fans of Douglas Adams will recognize this quandary. In his Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy books, the Magratheans design a supercomputer to answer the question, the ultimate question of “life, the universe, and everything.” The computer (named Deep Thought) tells them that it can do this, but it will take seven and a half million years to compute the answer. Generations after generations wait. The day finally arrives that Deep Thought is finally ready to reveal the answer. Yes, it has an answer. But the computer says, “Though I don’t think . . . that you are going to like it.” The Magratheans insisted on knowing what the answer is. Finally, Deep Thought tells them the answer: “Forty Two.” After much commotion the computer explains that the problem is that they’ve never actually known what the question was.

Scientists and theologians think they are asking different questions. What if they are asking the same questions, but in different ways? Scientists want to find how the universe works the way it does, while theologians want to find out why the universe works the way it does. The ultimate answer for one, might be the ultimate answer for the other.

The human brain knows that it is longing for answers. But the concepts may be so far above the understanding of the human brain that it doesn’t even know how to formulate the question. The universe is so complex from a microscopic to a macroscopic level that if there is a singular purpose for everything, it has to be so complex as to be incomprehensible to the human mind. Even if we had an answer, it would mean nothing to us. It would be like explaining derivative of inverse trigonometric functions to an ant (we’re the ant).

Or, maybe the answers (and the questions) are all right there in front of our faces, we just have to shift our frame of reference for it all to come into focus.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Link to Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is tr

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up (or