Skip to main content

The Big Question

 


Just about every culture that has ever existed on Earth has developed some kind of religion. Is this in itself evidence that God exists? Or is this just a quirk of the human mind? 

As human beings, we struggle with the big questions of life: why are we here etc. Some people look for answers in religion. Some look for answers in philosophy. Some look for answers in science. No one has ever come up with a universal answer, an answer that works for everyone. Why not? If there was one right answer, everyone should be able to recognize it. The rightness of it ought to be self-evident. There would be no need for competing religions or philosophies. If the answer was true, it ought to be as obvious as a volcano.

Maybe we struggle to find the answer because we are not very good at asking the question. Questions like: “why are we here?” Or “What’s it all about?” are really pretty vague and open-ended aren’t they? What specifically are you asking?  You might as well be asking “what’s the answer to the big question?” No wonder no one has ever answered them to everyone’s satisfaction.

Fans of Douglas Adams will recognize this quandary. In his Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy books, the Magratheans design a supercomputer to answer the question, the ultimate question of “life, the universe, and everything.” The computer (named Deep Thought) tells them that it can do this, but it will take seven and a half million years to compute the answer. Generations after generations wait. The day finally arrives that Deep Thought is finally ready to reveal the answer. Yes, it has an answer. But the computer says, “Though I don’t think . . . that you are going to like it.” The Magratheans insisted on knowing what the answer is. Finally, Deep Thought tells them the answer: “Forty Two.” After much commotion the computer explains that the problem is that they’ve never actually known what the question was.

Scientists and theologians think they are asking different questions. What if they are asking the same questions, but in different ways? Scientists want to find how the universe works the way it does, while theologians want to find out why the universe works the way it does. The ultimate answer for one, might be the ultimate answer for the other.

The human brain knows that it is longing for answers. But the concepts may be so far above the understanding of the human brain that it doesn’t even know how to formulate the question. The universe is so complex from a microscopic to a macroscopic level that if there is a singular purpose for everything, it has to be so complex as to be incomprehensible to the human mind. Even if we had an answer, it would mean nothing to us. It would be like explaining derivative of inverse trigonometric functions to an ant (we’re the ant).

Or, maybe the answers (and the questions) are all right there in front of our faces, we just have to shift our frame of reference for it all to come into focus.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

My first experience with cyberpunk as a genre of science fiction was Neuromancer by William Gibson. Neuromancer was one of the early works that defined the cyberpunk genre. It was insanely influential. It won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award. But for me, it just did not resonate. I had a hard time visualizing the concepts. It left a bad taste in my mouth for cyberpunk. I mostly avoided the genre. Then a couple of years ago I read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson which is cyberpunk (although some people say it is a parody of cyberpunk). Whatever, I liked it. I recently picked up All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu and it immediately became apparent to me that this was cyberpunk. Julia Z is the main character, and I think this is going to be the start of a series following her. She is a hacker (hence cyberpunk). She has got herself in trouble and so she lives on the margins, barely making it. Then a lawyer asks her for her help. His wife has been kidnapped. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Linear Nature of Time

    Go Go back Go back to the time before Before you did it Before they did it Before it was done to you Before the toast fell on the floor Before the catastrophe Before the mistake Before time’s scars Before   Go Go back Redeem it Rework it Fix it Go back   No you cannot Go back Star Liner
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Walls Don't Work

  At the peak of the Roman Empire, the empire stretched from the Persian Gulf to Brittain, from northern Africa to southern Germany. But the great conquering emperors like Trajan learned that conquering land was easy compared to holding on to it.   In fact, Trajan’s successor, Hadrian, was known for shrinking the empire and consolidating Trajan’s gains into a more defensible set of holdings. This made him not popular among his generals who wanted glory and spoils. But he understood if you stretch yourself too thin, you can wind up with nothing. To consolidate the Empire’s holdings in Brittain, he had a wall constructed from Solway Firth to the Tyne River. Construction began in the year 122 AD. The Empire had never been able to subdue the highland Scottish tribes, so this wall (Hadrian’s Wall) divided the “barbarians from the Romans.” It was a solid piece of engineering with forts and towers scattered along it to keep the “barbarians” out. Hadrian’s successor, Antonius Pius...
Post a Comment
Read more