Skip to main content

The Big Question

 


Just about every culture that has ever existed on Earth has developed some kind of religion. Is this in itself evidence that God exists? Or is this just a quirk of the human mind? 

As human beings, we struggle with the big questions of life: why are we here etc. Some people look for answers in religion. Some look for answers in philosophy. Some look for answers in science. No one has ever come up with a universal answer, an answer that works for everyone. Why not? If there was one right answer, everyone should be able to recognize it. The rightness of it ought to be self-evident. There would be no need for competing religions or philosophies. If the answer was true, it ought to be as obvious as a volcano.

Maybe we struggle to find the answer because we are not very good at asking the question. Questions like: “why are we here?” Or “What’s it all about?” are really pretty vague and open-ended aren’t they? What specifically are you asking?  You might as well be asking “what’s the answer to the big question?” No wonder no one has ever answered them to everyone’s satisfaction.

Fans of Douglas Adams will recognize this quandary. In his Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy books, the Magratheans design a supercomputer to answer the question, the ultimate question of “life, the universe, and everything.” The computer (named Deep Thought) tells them that it can do this, but it will take seven and a half million years to compute the answer. Generations after generations wait. The day finally arrives that Deep Thought is finally ready to reveal the answer. Yes, it has an answer. But the computer says, “Though I don’t think . . . that you are going to like it.” The Magratheans insisted on knowing what the answer is. Finally, Deep Thought tells them the answer: “Forty Two.” After much commotion the computer explains that the problem is that they’ve never actually known what the question was.

Scientists and theologians think they are asking different questions. What if they are asking the same questions, but in different ways? Scientists want to find how the universe works the way it does, while theologians want to find out why the universe works the way it does. The ultimate answer for one, might be the ultimate answer for the other.

The human brain knows that it is longing for answers. But the concepts may be so far above the understanding of the human brain that it doesn’t even know how to formulate the question. The universe is so complex from a microscopic to a macroscopic level that if there is a singular purpose for everything, it has to be so complex as to be incomprehensible to the human mind. Even if we had an answer, it would mean nothing to us. It would be like explaining derivative of inverse trigonometric functions to an ant (we’re the ant).

Or, maybe the answers (and the questions) are all right there in front of our faces, we just have to shift our frame of reference for it all to come into focus.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Link to Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more