Skip to main content

War and Peace

 


As I mentioned last week, I was reading War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy. I have now finished it. This classic book is one most people have heard of but I suspect not many today have read.

 It should be read.

On the one hand, War and Peace is a novel, with romance, intrigue, and a striving for success. On the other hand, in places, it is almost a history textbook.  If you were a history student wishing to learn about Russia’s involvement in the Napoleonic wars, you could do worse than simply reading War and Peace. It is a scholarly work which delves into the causes of the war, and criticizes historians who try to tell us the answers. Tolstoy points out that there are thousands of moving parts that lead to any eventual outcome. French historians blame the Russians for burning Moscow. Russian historians blame the French for burning Moscow. Tolstoy points out that it may well have been accidental, a natural result when you have looters and campers in a city made of wood and all the fire brigades have been evacuated. Tolstoy mocks the historians who claim that the French did not defeat the Russians the battle of Borodino because Napoleon had a cold. The truth is always more complex. There are a million, million factors that, taken in total, decide the outcome of any enterprise. Heroes are the ones that history crown with glory, but it is up to countless unsung people just doing their job that decide an outcome. I don’t want to imply that the ‘history’ parts of this are a dry, boring slog through a text book, a recitation of facts. The history comes in short bursts woven into the fabric of the story.

But primarily this is a novel. Tolstoy tells a compelling story. We follow the Rostov family, the Bolkonsky family, the enigmatic Pierre and many other major and minor characters who are trying to get on with their lives in wartime and in peacetime. People fall in love, fall out of love, are sometimes betrayed and made to feel the fool. Some of these characters learn from the lessons of life. Others do not. Just like in real life. We meet good people, bad people, and lots and lots of morally gray people. The story is rich in character development. Some of the minor characters are a fascinating study. Some give us their philosophy of life; others just give us snippets of their life that let us see what it was like for them. Most of the major characters are from the upper class of 19th Century Russian society, so we get a pretty good feel for what it was like to be in that class at that time. The salons, the balls and even money problems. We follow them through peace, then war, then peace, then war. It becomes quite obvious that officers in the army come from the upper classes while the grunts come from the lower classes. In fact, they didn’t appear to have to demonstrate any particular skill to be an officer, just be born into the right family (This phenomenon was not unique to Russia. Many 19th Century armies including American armies functioned the same way). Just because a family was noble did not mean they were rich. We see the Rostovs with perpetual money problems as the Count is clueless how the world works. This causes them to seek good marriages for their children . . . I don’t care if you love Sonya, you have to marry a rich girl or the family is ruined!

No one survives the war unscathed. Families have lost brothers, sons. Some soldiers and civilians caught up in events return different people than before the war. Some have changed for the better, realizing that the things they used to worry about were trivial. Others have changed for the worse. The war that they were all living through was probably the largest conflict the world had seen up until that time. (If someone had been thinking along these lines they might have called it World War I). Yet, as we have seen time and again, people will find a way to endure hardships. That I think, may be the ultimate lesson of War and Peace: no matter how hard life gets, there is always hope. War and Peace is a big book, a very big book. But it is not some dry and dusty old tome that should only be read by scholars. It is full of life, love, conflict, altruism, greed, lust, faith, genius, and stupidity. All the things that make us human.

It should be read.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more