Skip to main content

A Bit of Scalzi

 


I just finished The Last Emperox by John Scalzi. It was a satisfying ending to his Interdependency trilogy. The first book in the series is The Collapsing Empire, followed by The Consuming Fire, and it finishes with The Last Emperox. The premise of the series is that humankind has found the answer to faster-than-light travel among the stars in something called “the flow”. The flow consists of natural trails or streams through spacetime that allow a ship to take a shortcut through the universe. Humanity is spread out in an empire called the Interdependency. It is called that because none of the worlds or habitats have enough resources to sustain their inhabitants. But they all have resources that the other world or habitats need. So, they are dependent upon each other. The problem is that these flow streams are breaking down and scientists have discovered that it is just a matter of time before they all dissolve, leaving people stranded on worlds that cannot support them. The Interdependency is ruled by an Emperox (a gender neutral term). Early in the first book the Emperox Attavio IV dies and his son, the heir apparent, also dies. This leaves Attavio’s bastard daughter Cardenia to be named emperox, a title she never expected and is totally unprepared for. We see Cardenia’s baptism by fire as she quickly has to learn the ropes of political machinations. The imperial seat is a very dangerous place for a novice. The scheming Nadashe Nohamaptan is determined to rule the empire one way or another, and no green girl is going to stand in her way.

Cardenia is a likable underdog. Yes, even though she is the emperox, she is still very much an underdog. The mercantile houses (family houses like the Nohamaptans) are very powerful. If they act together, they are more powerful than the Emperox. There is intrigue on a level Cardenia could never have imagined. We watch her learn and grow and try her own schemes to counter the Nohamaptans. Cardenia’s stated goal is to try to save every citizen in the Interdependency. This is a noble goal, but one that seems to be impossible, and it is one that pits her against the mercantile houses that simply want to save as many of their own families as possible and screw everybody else. 

Scalzi’s books are always fun. Many are couched with a humor that is just a bit twisted. The guilty pleasure for me in this series was how much I enjoyed the character of Kiva Lagos. Kiva just about cannot string two sentences together without including some variant of the F-word. I am not usually a fan of profanity just for profanity sake, but with Kiva it is built into her. It makes her who she is. I found myself looking forward with delight to Kiva chapters. What was jarring at first, came to feel as natural a part of her character as Clint Eastwood’s squint.

Nadashe Nohamaptan is the villain of the story (well, the most prominent one). She is decidedly evil, yet many of her plots don’t go the way she planned, and some that do have unintended consequences. She is rich, she is malevolent, she is powerful, but she is also not the sharpest tool in the box.

Can I just say something about the ships’ names? The star ships have wonderful whimsical names. Here is a sample of some of the ship names: Yes, Sir, That’s My baby, another is called, Tell Me Another One, and Our Love Couldn’t Go On. Scalzi’s ship names may be an homage to the names of ships in stories by Ian Banks, who gave his ships names like Size Isn’t Everything. Hmm . . . I wonder if Elon Musk had been reading Scalzi or Banks when he named his SpaceX ships and drone ships (look them up).

So, if you like your science fiction with political intrigue and a bit of dark humor, this series might be for you.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more