Skip to main content

A Bit of Scalzi

 


I just finished The Last Emperox by John Scalzi. It was a satisfying ending to his Interdependency trilogy. The first book in the series is The Collapsing Empire, followed by The Consuming Fire, and it finishes with The Last Emperox. The premise of the series is that humankind has found the answer to faster-than-light travel among the stars in something called “the flow”. The flow consists of natural trails or streams through spacetime that allow a ship to take a shortcut through the universe. Humanity is spread out in an empire called the Interdependency. It is called that because none of the worlds or habitats have enough resources to sustain their inhabitants. But they all have resources that the other world or habitats need. So, they are dependent upon each other. The problem is that these flow streams are breaking down and scientists have discovered that it is just a matter of time before they all dissolve, leaving people stranded on worlds that cannot support them. The Interdependency is ruled by an Emperox (a gender neutral term). Early in the first book the Emperox Attavio IV dies and his son, the heir apparent, also dies. This leaves Attavio’s bastard daughter Cardenia to be named emperox, a title she never expected and is totally unprepared for. We see Cardenia’s baptism by fire as she quickly has to learn the ropes of political machinations. The imperial seat is a very dangerous place for a novice. The scheming Nadashe Nohamaptan is determined to rule the empire one way or another, and no green girl is going to stand in her way.

Cardenia is a likable underdog. Yes, even though she is the emperox, she is still very much an underdog. The mercantile houses (family houses like the Nohamaptans) are very powerful. If they act together, they are more powerful than the Emperox. There is intrigue on a level Cardenia could never have imagined. We watch her learn and grow and try her own schemes to counter the Nohamaptans. Cardenia’s stated goal is to try to save every citizen in the Interdependency. This is a noble goal, but one that seems to be impossible, and it is one that pits her against the mercantile houses that simply want to save as many of their own families as possible and screw everybody else. 

Scalzi’s books are always fun. Many are couched with a humor that is just a bit twisted. The guilty pleasure for me in this series was how much I enjoyed the character of Kiva Lagos. Kiva just about cannot string two sentences together without including some variant of the F-word. I am not usually a fan of profanity just for profanity sake, but with Kiva it is built into her. It makes her who she is. I found myself looking forward with delight to Kiva chapters. What was jarring at first, came to feel as natural a part of her character as Clint Eastwood’s squint.

Nadashe Nohamaptan is the villain of the story (well, the most prominent one). She is decidedly evil, yet many of her plots don’t go the way she planned, and some that do have unintended consequences. She is rich, she is malevolent, she is powerful, but she is also not the sharpest tool in the box.

Can I just say something about the ships’ names? The star ships have wonderful whimsical names. Here is a sample of some of the ship names: Yes, Sir, That’s My baby, another is called, Tell Me Another One, and Our Love Couldn’t Go On. Scalzi’s ship names may be an homage to the names of ships in stories by Ian Banks, who gave his ships names like Size Isn’t Everything. Hmm . . . I wonder if Elon Musk had been reading Scalzi or Banks when he named his SpaceX ships and drone ships (look them up).

So, if you like your science fiction with political intrigue and a bit of dark humor, this series might be for you.

 

(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more