Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on A Game of Thrones


 

Now that some time has passed since I saw the ending, I can reflect on the HBO series Game of Thrones. And, just so you know, there will be spoilers here (for the show; not the books, since we don’t know for sure how the books will end). There were some great moments in the final season. The battle with the ice king was spectacular. But I do have to say that the final season left me disappointed. It was unsatisfying for the relationship I felt with a number of the characters, including Tyrion and Jon Snow. But what bothered me the most was the Endings for Cersei and Danny.

Cersei had been a formidable opponent throughout the series. She was evil and cunning, and as much as we all hated her, you had to admit, she knew how to get things done. I have to say that Cersei in the show is maybe more cunning than she is in the books. But even in the books she always has a plan or scheme, and a drive to get what she wants. It doesn’t always work because she is not as smart as she thinks she is, but she always has a plan. That is why it seems rather odd that Cersei sits in her tower and watches the opposing army entering her city nearly unopposed. She watches Danny’s dragon burning down half the city. She just stands there watching without a backup plan. Someone has to suggest to her that it is time to leave. You think? With a dragon coming for her and chaos in the streets, one would think she would have at least figured that out for herself. And then as she is scurrying away, the building collapses on her and kills her. A most unsatisfactory ending for a major villain.

Then there is Danny. Daenerys Targaryen, who we have been rooting for the entire series, watches as Cersei kills her friend Missadei. That event is apparently enough to turn Danny into a monster. We go from rooting for her to hating her. It is almost anticlimactic when Jon Snow kills her. Will George R.R. Martin do this in the book? (The final book will be called A Dream of Spring.)  I doubt it. He might have Danny turn bad, but if he does, I would venture to bet that he would draw it out as a long slow descent into darkness. It would be a descent that we would witness every step of the way. In other words, if George does have Danny turn evil, it will make sense. Unlike in the series where it is: you killed my friend, now I am EVIL!  Of course, we don’t know if George is going to do that. The show has taken such liberties with the books that we really can’t rely on them to predict what will be in the books. Actually, the first season of the series followed the books closely. The second season followed reasonably well, and then with each successive season, the series diverged more and more from the books. Some of that is to be expected. The screen has different pacing requirements than a book. Also, there are budgetary constraints. But some of the changes from book to series are inexplicable to me (why have Melisandre kill Stannis’s daughter?)

Don’t get me wrong, I liked the series overall. My wife and I would look forward to each episode. It was the series that caused me to go out and read the books. The last two episodes were disappointing, but still, for a show that ran for eight seasons, that is a pretty good track record.


(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more