Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on A Game of Thrones


 

Now that some time has passed since I saw the ending, I can reflect on the HBO series Game of Thrones. And, just so you know, there will be spoilers here (for the show; not the books, since we don’t know for sure how the books will end). There were some great moments in the final season. The battle with the ice king was spectacular. But I do have to say that the final season left me disappointed. It was unsatisfying for the relationship I felt with a number of the characters, including Tyrion and Jon Snow. But what bothered me the most was the Endings for Cersei and Danny.

Cersei had been a formidable opponent throughout the series. She was evil and cunning, and as much as we all hated her, you had to admit, she knew how to get things done. I have to say that Cersei in the show is maybe more cunning than she is in the books. But even in the books she always has a plan or scheme, and a drive to get what she wants. It doesn’t always work because she is not as smart as she thinks she is, but she always has a plan. That is why it seems rather odd that Cersei sits in her tower and watches the opposing army entering her city nearly unopposed. She watches Danny’s dragon burning down half the city. She just stands there watching without a backup plan. Someone has to suggest to her that it is time to leave. You think? With a dragon coming for her and chaos in the streets, one would think she would have at least figured that out for herself. And then as she is scurrying away, the building collapses on her and kills her. A most unsatisfactory ending for a major villain.

Then there is Danny. Daenerys Targaryen, who we have been rooting for the entire series, watches as Cersei kills her friend Missadei. That event is apparently enough to turn Danny into a monster. We go from rooting for her to hating her. It is almost anticlimactic when Jon Snow kills her. Will George R.R. Martin do this in the book? (The final book will be called A Dream of Spring.)  I doubt it. He might have Danny turn bad, but if he does, I would venture to bet that he would draw it out as a long slow descent into darkness. It would be a descent that we would witness every step of the way. In other words, if George does have Danny turn evil, it will make sense. Unlike in the series where it is: you killed my friend, now I am EVIL!  Of course, we don’t know if George is going to do that. The show has taken such liberties with the books that we really can’t rely on them to predict what will be in the books. Actually, the first season of the series followed the books closely. The second season followed reasonably well, and then with each successive season, the series diverged more and more from the books. Some of that is to be expected. The screen has different pacing requirements than a book. Also, there are budgetary constraints. But some of the changes from book to series are inexplicable to me (why have Melisandre kill Stannis’s daughter?)

Don’t get me wrong, I liked the series overall. My wife and I would look forward to each episode. It was the series that caused me to go out and read the books. The last two episodes were disappointing, but still, for a show that ran for eight seasons, that is a pretty good track record.


(My science fiction novel Star Liner, is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more