Skip to main content

Chronological Obsolescence

 



You can’t get much more futuristic dystopian than the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell. It practically invented the subgenre of dystopian science fiction.   It was written in the 1940’s when the year 1984 seemed like a long way off.  I was thinking about it the other day and realizing that the year 1984 was 37 years ago. A good chunk of the population of the world wasn’t even born yet when this “futuristic” novel was set. How are we supposed to feel about a book or a film that is set in a future that has already passed? Nineteen Eighty-Four is not alone in this quandary.  Back to the Future II (the one that is really set in the future) is set in 2015. The novel Make Room, Make Room by Harry Harrison which became the movie Soylent Green, was set in 1999. The film Blade Runner is set in 2019. Ray Bradbury’s the Martian Chronicles (in the original printing) was set over a range of years from 1999 to 2026. At least Aldous Huxley set his Brave New World far enough in the future (2540 AD) so as not to have to worry about this problem for a long time.                               

And let’s not forget 2001: A Space Odyssey. That movie, even though it did not do terribly well at the box office when it first came out, became an icon and is recognized as one of the great films of the 20th Century. Kids like me in 1968, looked at the beautiful, fantastical future of 2001 and knew that we would probably see that year in our lifetimes. We wondered what our lives would be like. That we would have moon bases and space stations by then, seemed a sure bet. After all the movie came out just one year before Apollo 11 landed on the moon. No one could have imagined that after a few trips, we would abandon the moon altogether. But when we actually got to the year 2001, we didn’t think too much about the movie. By then we had forgotten all those visions of what the year 2001 would be like.

Had I been alive in the 1940’s when Nineteen Eighty-Four was written, I might have wondered about the future 1984. Would it be a technological wonderland or a dystopian nightmare? I guess that would have depended on if you were an optimist or a pessimist. As it was, I did not read Nineteen Eighty-Four until the year 1984. They came out with a new edition that year (of course they did). The world described in the novel was quite different from the world I lived, in so it was easy to just pass it off as a work of fiction and appreciate it as such. And yet, Nineteen Eighty-Four was written as a warning and some of the things we were being warned about have come to pass. Surveillance is now everywhere at least in cities. From traffic cameras to security cameras, big Brother is watching. Those cameras may not have been there in 1984, but they are there now, with more coming on line every day. In my country, America has not become a totalitarian dictatorship as the country shown in the novel, yet we are increasingly becoming a country of the haves and have-nots. 1% of the population own more wealth than the bottom 90%. That sounds like a recipe for a dystopian world.

When you are travelling through time, the time you are at, is always the time you are at. Dreams of the future and memories of the past are less important than the problems of the day.  So, we pass these landmarks taking little notice. We appreciate the fiction as fiction, and don’t worry about the fact that we don’t actually have antigravity hoverboards to zip around on. It is good not to take the future predictions too literally. But the warnings . . . those we should pay attention to.

(My science fiction novel Star Liner (set in the very distant undefined future), is now available in paperback or as an e-book through Amazon and other online sources).

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iron Fist in a Velvet Glove

  Despite both of us having science backgrounds, my wife and I share a leaning toward the artistic, though we may express it in different ways. In her life, my wife has been a painter, a poet, a singer, an actor, and a fiction writer. Not to mention a mother. I don’t remember what precipitated this event, but my wife, my son, and I were at home in the front room. My wife was responding to something my son said. She said, “remember, you get half your brains from me. If it wasn’t for me, you’d be a complete idiot.” To which my son started howling with laughter and said to me,” I think you have just been insulted.” Sometimes I feel like Rodney Dangerfield. I get no respect. But that is not an uncommon state of affairs for fatherhood. When my son was going to middle school and high school, my wife was always the one to go in with him to get him registered for classes. One time she was unable to go and I had to be the one to get him registered. “Ugh,” he said. “why can’t Mama do i...
1 comment
Read more

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more