Skip to main content

When the Screen got it Right

 


This is my list of what I consider to be the best adaptations of science fiction/fantasy books to screen. These are in no particular order because if I tried to rank them, my rankings would change with my moods or what I had last seen or other unimportant motivators. Also, this is my list. It is not your list. Your list is going to be different than mine, and that’s okay. This is not a list of my favorite sci-fi/fantasy films (though some of them are on this list). It is not a list of my favorite sci-fi/fantasy books that have been made into films. This list is all about how good the adaptation was. As excellent as it is, you won’t find 2001: A Space Odyssey on the list because the film and the book were a joint project. The film was not an adaptation of the book. In order for it to be on my list I had to have both read the book and seen the movie or series. So, much as I loved the movie The Martian, I can’t put it on my list because I haven’t read Andy Weir’s book (note to self: read The Martian).  There are a lot of great films that fall into this category. So, of those that I have read and seen, here is the list:

 

A Boy and His Dog (1975) based on the novella by Harlan Ellison

Harlan Ellison knew a thing or two about social satire, and the filmmaker L.Q. Jones make sure to maintain that element in the story. In fact, I watched this film as part of a sociology class in college. Even though this movie was not a great success at the box office, it inspired others, namely the Mad Max series, the video game Fallout and I think certain aspects of Firefly.  In this post-apocalyptic tale, the film stays fairly true to the novella. The same . . . interesting ending is in both. A boy loves his dog.

 

Blade Runner (1982) based on the book Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? By Phillip K. Dick.

This one is quite a bit different from the book. But Ridley Scott knows how to tell a tale cinematically. And not every well written book translates well into film. Scott and the screenwriters wove a mix of original material and new material into a taut cohesive mindblower.

 

The Lord of the Rings trilogy (2001, 2002, 2003) based on the trilogy by J.R.R. Tolkien.

People had been trying to make films about Tolkien’s work for decades, and it just didn’t work. The story was so grand in scope that it came to be considered unfilmable. Good thing nobody told that to Peter Jackson. He managed to capture the grandeur and scope of the original story, keeping in the most important parts. (I am less impressed with his adaptation of The Hobbit).

 

Total Recall (1990) based on the Story “We Can Remember it for you Wholesale” by Phillip K. Dick.

Yes, another Phillip K. Dick story. Hollywood loves making movies of his work, but they don’t always do a good job adapting them. I could have put Minority Report on this list, which is a good looking movie, but the short story is so superior to the movie (it actually made sense) that I just couldn’t do it. Total Recall however is an entertaining thriller. The movie does a good job of taking what could have been complex concepts and makes them understandable.

 

Soylent Green (1973) based on the novel Make Room, Make Room by Harry Harrison.

Director Richard Fleischer and screenwriter Stanley R. Greenberg take Harrison’s story, setting and situation and completely rework it. The movie is a different kind of story from the book. The book is more introspective, exploring the personal costs for living in an overpopulated world.  The Movie is more focused on the Police officer played by Charleton Heston, and a conspiracy. But it works. I have to say, I think Edward G. Robinson gives the finest performance of his long career in this, his final movie.

 

Game of Thrones (Television series 2011 to 2015-ish) based on the first five books of The Song of Ice and Fire series by George R.R. Martin

I am ignoring the last two or three seasons because those books haven’t come out yet. So just judging this series as far as the books go, it is an excellent adaptation. They do take a lot of liberties with the story and move events around so it is hard to pick an exact point where the series leaves the books behind. I don’t always agree with the choices made by the show runners, but overall it is a compelling and thrilling adaptation of the first five books of the series. (I had some big-time problems with the final season, but for the reasons mentioned above, the final few seasons are not part of this list.)

 

The Thing (1951) Based on the novella Who Goes There? By John W. Campbell

Quite a bit different than the novella, it is nonetheless a tense nail-biter. I did an earlier blog about it. The John Carpenter version from 1982 is much closer to the original story and I have heard it is excellent, but I have not seen the whole thing, just bits and pieces of it, so I can’t put it on my list yet (Note to self: watch Carpenter’s The Thing)

 

Annihilation (2018) based on the novel by Jeff VanderMeer

In this one, the book is definitely better than the movie. But they did a good job of bringing out that creepy feel that is in the book.

 

Dave (1993)

Yes, the movie with Kevin Kline and Sigourney Weaver. They don’t credit him, but I am going to say they got the idea for this movie from Robert A. Heinlein’s novel Double Star. I also suspect the movie Moon Over Parador (1988) was inspired by the same story, but again, no credit to Heinlein. Dave is the superior movie of the two. Even though it removed all of the sci-fi aspects, I am going to include it on the list.

 

The Fly (1986) based on the short story by George Langelaan

I like the 1986 movie better than the 1958 movie. David Cronenberg knows how to get all weird and twisty. It’s kind of his thing. He injects the right mix of horror and pathos into this frightening tale. Jeff Goldblum never looked so good, or so bad.

 

That is my list (so far). This being said, there are a large number of great science fiction and fantasy stories that have been make into terrible movies and television. Still others that have been made into movies that are just okay. Maybe I should do a list of those: “Books that deserved better!” But I probably won’t. Just trust the fact that usually (not always) the book is better than the movie, and keep reading.


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more