Skip to main content

Fight!

 


                                                                                                                                 Image by klimkin from Pixabay 

A lot of writers are good at writing fight scenes. For my money, one of the best is Lois McMaster Bujold. It doesn’t matter whether it is swords and arrows, or plasma arcs and laser cannons. She writes engaging and logical action that is easy for the reader to follow. Yet her attention to detail about the logistics of a fight makes one wonder if she has had training in military tactics.

I have also read fight scenes written by authors who are not as skilled as Lois McMaster Bujold, and some of them are cringe-worthy. I have written a few fight scenes myself, and it seems to me there are a few guidelines a writer should keep in mind when writing action sequences. Do you have to be an expert in the style of combat you are engaging in? No, but you should have a basic understanding of the skills and tactics. If you are using an existing weapon system like say, sabers, you should understand the basic of how to fight with a saber. If you are employing a weapon that does not exist in our world, either because it is magical or hasn’t been invented yet, then there are no basics to be had, but you still have to use some logic. A fight has to be believable otherwise you will lose the interest of your audience. You don’t have to be an expert in mixed martial arts to describe a bar fight. But if your protagonist is supposed to be an expert in mixed martial arts, then you need to have a better than passing acquaintance with the subject yourself.

You should also be realistic about what the body can take. One thing I hate is reading a scene where the hero is hit on the head with a pipe wrench, shakes it off and resumes fighting. No. Unless your head is protected by magic or a deflector shield, if you get hit on the head with a pipe wrench, you are done. At the very least, you will be knocked out. The same with getting shot. “oh, it’s just a flesh wound.” Flesh wounds hurt. Even if it is not in a vital part of the body, it is going to catch up with you. You may be able to run on adrenaline for a bit, but pretty soon shock is going to set in. This also goes for the balance of relative strengths. If your hero is small of stature and of build and is facing a 1000 lb. mutant grizzly bear, I don’t care how good their fighting skills are, they are going to lose that fight. Now, that hero could win by outsmarting the bear or finding other resources, but it has to be something other than a physical one-on-one hand to hand fight. David defeated Goliath by utilizing a weapon that Goliath did not have. He didn’t beat Goliath by his superior skill in fisticuffs.  

It is also possible to get so wrapped up describing the positions and directions, the minutia of choreography of the scene, that you lose the reader. This is particularly problematic if you are describing the landscape of the arena with pieces of geography that haven’t been well established before-hand.

Spike grabbed the less prominent fin of the actuator while using the cover of the dorsal flange of a bobo tree and vaulted himself to the second niche in the easternmost plinth.

These things can be hard for me to visualize as a reader, and if I can’t visualize it, I am going to stop paying attention, and if I stop paying attention, that means I am starting to lose interest.

If you are going to write a fight scene, my advice is to make it as simple as you can within the necessities of the story. And keep it realistic. Even if you are writing fantasy or futuristic sci-fi, if the fight isn’t believable, then there is not much investment in the outcome.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more