Skip to main content

Handwavium

 



There is a term when a science fiction writer pulls something out of their butt to explain how the hero can solve an unsolvable problem. The writer will invent some hither-to-unknown substance, technology, or device that magically solves the problem. The idea is that he can just wave his hands and the problem goes away. When a writer does this s/he is employing “handwavium.”

In the movie Thank You for Smoking, a cigarette executive played by Aaron Eckhart,  is talking with a movie executive played by Rob Lowe, about how to get smokers on screen in a more favorable light. The movie exec is open to this and says, “How do you feel about the future?”

“The future?”

“Yeah, after all the health thing’s blown over . . . Sony has a new sci-fi flick they are looking to make. Message from Sector Six. All takes place in a space station.”

“Cigarettes in space?”

“It’s the final frontier Nick.”

“But wouldn’t they blow up in an all-oxygen environment?”

“Hmm . . . Probably . . . but it’s an easy fix. One line of dialogue, ‘thank God we invented the, you know, whatever device.” Rob Lowe is literally waving his hands in the air as he says, “the whatever device.”

The original Star Trek series was no stranger to handwavium. Many episodes featured a polysyllabic disease or substance which did just what the script needed it to do.  But in one episode the audience was in on it, as the characters knowingly used it to try to scare off the bad guys. In the episode “The Corbomite Maneuver,” Captain Kirk has to think quickly when his ship is threatened by a massively superior alien vehicle the size of a planet.  Kirk tells the aliens that the Enterprise’s hull is impregnated with the top-secret substance “corbomite” (which he just made up).  And if the other ship fired on them this corbomite would create a massive blast that would destroy everything within several parsecs of the ship.

The more obvious and egregious forms of handwavium are found more on screen that in written fiction. It can be sort of cheating. Instead of doing the hard work of scientifically figuring out how to solve the problem, they just invent some new term and solve it that way.

There is plenty of handwavium in written fiction too, but it isn’t all necessarily bad (I have been known to engage in it myself). If you are doing something that is scientifically impossible like travelling back in time, the reader can accept the wonder, for the sake of the story without the writer explaining in technical detail the physics of how this was accomplished (unless the “how” is integral to the story). The reader doesn’t always need to know the scientific underpinnings of a bold new concept or device. However, when it is used, it is important not to go to the well too often. It is best not to have more than one wonder per story or the readers will lose interest. Too many wonders mean anything is possible and if anything is possible then nothing is really at risk.

It is not just in science fiction. Anyone who wishes to make a point without really having the evidence to back it up can employ it. Politicians do it all the time. They just make stuff up or use meaningless jargon to make the world rosier, or scarier depending on the effect they are going for. Another term for this is “BS.”

So, if you choose to write science fiction, science should be your guide, but every once in a while, you are allowed to pull a fast one. And remember, when you find yourself in a sticky situation, the force will be with you.

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t