Skip to main content

Handwavium

 



There is a term when a science fiction writer pulls something out of their butt to explain how the hero can solve an unsolvable problem. The writer will invent some hither-to-unknown substance, technology, or device that magically solves the problem. The idea is that he can just wave his hands and the problem goes away. When a writer does this s/he is employing “handwavium.”

In the movie Thank You for Smoking, a cigarette executive played by Aaron Eckhart,  is talking with a movie executive played by Rob Lowe, about how to get smokers on screen in a more favorable light. The movie exec is open to this and says, “How do you feel about the future?”

“The future?”

“Yeah, after all the health thing’s blown over . . . Sony has a new sci-fi flick they are looking to make. Message from Sector Six. All takes place in a space station.”

“Cigarettes in space?”

“It’s the final frontier Nick.”

“But wouldn’t they blow up in an all-oxygen environment?”

“Hmm . . . Probably . . . but it’s an easy fix. One line of dialogue, ‘thank God we invented the, you know, whatever device.” Rob Lowe is literally waving his hands in the air as he says, “the whatever device.”

The original Star Trek series was no stranger to handwavium. Many episodes featured a polysyllabic disease or substance which did just what the script needed it to do.  But in one episode the audience was in on it, as the characters knowingly used it to try to scare off the bad guys. In the episode “The Corbomite Maneuver,” Captain Kirk has to think quickly when his ship is threatened by a massively superior alien vehicle the size of a planet.  Kirk tells the aliens that the Enterprise’s hull is impregnated with the top-secret substance “corbomite” (which he just made up).  And if the other ship fired on them this corbomite would create a massive blast that would destroy everything within several parsecs of the ship.

The more obvious and egregious forms of handwavium are found more on screen that in written fiction. It can be sort of cheating. Instead of doing the hard work of scientifically figuring out how to solve the problem, they just invent some new term and solve it that way.

There is plenty of handwavium in written fiction too, but it isn’t all necessarily bad (I have been known to engage in it myself). If you are doing something that is scientifically impossible like travelling back in time, the reader can accept the wonder, for the sake of the story without the writer explaining in technical detail the physics of how this was accomplished (unless the “how” is integral to the story). The reader doesn’t always need to know the scientific underpinnings of a bold new concept or device. However, when it is used, it is important not to go to the well too often. It is best not to have more than one wonder per story or the readers will lose interest. Too many wonders mean anything is possible and if anything is possible then nothing is really at risk.

It is not just in science fiction. Anyone who wishes to make a point without really having the evidence to back it up can employ it. Politicians do it all the time. They just make stuff up or use meaningless jargon to make the world rosier, or scarier depending on the effect they are going for. Another term for this is “BS.”

So, if you choose to write science fiction, science should be your guide, but every once in a while, you are allowed to pull a fast one. And remember, when you find yourself in a sticky situation, the force will be with you.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more