Skip to main content

Chaos on the Page; Chaos on the Stage

 



Art is a wonderful part of the human experience. My two preferred vehicles for producing art are acting and writing. They are both forms of artistic expression, and yet they are, in some ways, quite different.

Actor:

 An actor is a problem solver. Every night, every performance, something will go wrong. It could be a tiny thing that the audience will never notice, or it could be an apocalypse. Whichever it is, the actors on stage will figure out how to deal with it and move on. The actor knows this, and it is one of the things that plays on his/her nerves before a performance. Who is going to make an error tonight? Will it be you, or you, or me? If it is a big error and the actor does not think quickly enough, chaos will ensue. Chaos is generally a bad thing on stage (unless it is in the script).

Writer:

A writer is a problem creator. Writers leave mayhem in their wake. A writer will deliberately make something go wrong for their characters, maybe several things. Then the writer has to figure out how their character is going to solve the problem(s). Stories aren’t very interesting if nothing bad happens to anyone. Writers are agents of chaos. Chaos is glorious on the page.

Certainly, actors do more than simply fix problems that come up during a performance. Actors bring the playwright’s characters to life. Actors have to learn lines, and movement. They have to interpret scenes, and their role in the play as a whole. They have to learn how softly they can speak and still be heard by an audience. They have to learn how to make the writer’s intentional chaos believable and effective. They have these and many other skills in their toolboxes. But one of the tools in that box is the ability to manage the unintended chaos that sometimes attacks a performance.

Writers too, do more that just create chaos. They have to learn how to develop a plot and characters, how to fill in the world around those characters so the reader has a sense of place and time. They have to be knowledgeable in the mechanics of grammar, spelling (even in these heady days of spelling and grammar checkers). They need to develop a style and make their narrative flow. But creating conflict for your characters is essential. I heard one writer say that you should put your characters in peril . . . and then triple it.

It takes different parts of your brain to be an actor than it does to be a writer, just as it takes different parts of your brain to be a musician than it does to be a composer. That’s okay. We all have different parts to our brains. We each learn how to make, or deal with chaos in our daily lives. While we may not all be able to be sculptors, or actors, or nuclear physicists, each of us can excel in more than one thing. That is what is great about being a human.

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Retired

  I retired this week. So, big lifestyle changes for me? Not so much. I retired on Thursday. My office had an amazing party for me on Wednesday, lots of food, lots of cards, lots of personal connections. Gifts too, I wish I had told them, no gifts. I really don’t need anything. But all this does make one feel appreciated. It also makes me feel appreciated that they want me to come back on a contractual basis every now and then to impart my institutional knowledge. It is always the case when someone retires, knowledge is lost to the organization. Things have to be relearned by the next generation. This is somewhat offset by the fact that the world is changing through advancing technology etc. So, the knowledge that the retiring person has might eventually become obsolete anyway. Better to go out while you are still on top. We have all seen professional athletes who stayed on well beyond their prime. It would have been better to go out while still on top. But it is a hard thing to ...

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

My first experience with cyberpunk as a genre of science fiction was Neuromancer by William Gibson. Neuromancer was one of the early works that defined the cyberpunk genre. It was insanely influential. It won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award. But for me, it just did not resonate. I had a hard time visualizing the concepts. It left a bad taste in my mouth for cyberpunk. I mostly avoided the genre. Then a couple of years ago I read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson which is cyberpunk (although some people say it is a parody of cyberpunk). Whatever, I liked it. I recently picked up All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu and it immediately became apparent to me that this was cyberpunk. Julia Z is the main character, and I think this is going to be the start of a series following her. She is a hacker (hence cyberpunk). She has got herself in trouble and so she lives on the margins, barely making it. Then a lawyer asks her for her help. His wife has been kidnapped. The ...

Darkness

  There was a moment when I discovered that l liked dark music. I do like dark music. I like minor keys and a haunting theme. I like other kinds of music too, but that darkness speaks to me in a special way. What does that say about me? Am I messed up? I don’t think so. Maybe I am just built that way that haunting tunes or lyrics imparts some inner truth to me. It resonates. I know precisely when I discovered this about myself. It was Summer of 1971. I was 12 years old. I was on a plane with my family heading to Illinois. Airplanes back then did not have much in the way of entertainment, but what they did have were headphones and music channels you could listen to. I was listening to a channel of popular current hits, and a song came on called “That’s the Way I Always Heard it Should Be” by Carly Simon. I had never heard of Carly Simon. This was before “Anticipation” and “You’re so Vain.” She was not yet famous. But this song came on and, I don’t know, it did something to me. It...