Chaos on the Page; Chaos on the Stage

Art is a wonderful part of the human experience. My two preferred vehicles for producing art are acting and writing. They are both forms of artistic expression, and yet they are, in some ways, quite different.

Actor:

An actor is a problem solver. Every night, every performance, something will go wrong. It could be a tiny thing that the audience will never notice, or it could be an apocalypse. Whichever it is, the actors on stage will figure out how to deal with it and move on. The actor knows this, and it is one of the things that plays on his/her nerves before a performance. Who is going to make an error tonight? Will it be you, or you, or me? If it is a big error and the actor does not think quickly enough, chaos will ensue. Chaos is generally a bad thing on stage (unless it is in the script).

Writer:

A writer is a problem creator. Writers leave mayhem in their wake. A writer will deliberately make something go wrong for their characters, maybe several things. Then the writer has to figure out how their character is going to solve the problem(s). Stories aren’t very interesting if nothing bad happens to anyone. Writers are agents of chaos. Chaos is glorious on the page.

Certainly, actors do more than simply fix problems that come up during a performance. Actors bring the playwright’s characters to life. Actors have to learn lines, and movement. They have to interpret scenes, and their role in the play as a whole. They have to learn how softly they can speak and still be heard by an audience. They have to learn how to make the writer’s intentional chaos believable and effective. They have these and many other skills in their toolboxes. But one of the tools in that box is the ability to manage the unintended chaos that sometimes attacks a performance.

Writers too, do more that just create chaos. They have to learn how to develop a plot and characters, how to fill in the world around those characters so the reader has a sense of place and time. They have to be knowledgeable in the mechanics of grammar, spelling (even in these heady days of spelling and grammar checkers). They need to develop a style and make their narrative flow. But creating conflict for your characters is essential. I heard one writer say that you should put your characters in peril . . . and then triple it.

It takes different parts of your brain to be an actor than it does to be a writer, just as it takes different parts of your brain to be a musician than it does to be a composer. That’s okay. We all have different parts to our brains. We each learn how to make, or deal with chaos in our daily lives. While we may not all be able to be sculptors, or actors, or nuclear physicists, each of us can excel in more than one thing. That is what is great about being a human.

Star Liner

Comments

The Trip Home

My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t

A speculative mind

Search This Blog