Skip to main content

All Systems Red


 

This year Martha Wells won the Nebula Award for best science fiction novel. Her winning novel was Network Effect. I have never read anything by Martha Wells. I discovered that Network Effect is the fifth book in The Murderbot Diaries series. I decided I had better start at the beginning with the first book: All Systems Red. It turns out All Systems Red won the Hugo, the Nebula Award, and other awards in 2018 for best novella.

The main character calls itself ‘Murderbot’. It is a SecUnit: a security unit, owned by “the company” and contracted out to provide security for survey teams or anyone else who needed security. The Murderbot is some kind of a cyborg, part human and part machine, but it is more machine than human.  It has artificial intelligence and human brain tissue. It does not have status a as person, hence it can be owned. All SecUnits come with governor modules that govern what they can and cannot do. Well, they are supposed to have governor modules. This particular SecUnit had a troubled history. Due to a malfunctioning governor module, it had gone on some kind of rampage and killed a lot of people. It was because of this incident that it decided to call itself Murderbot.  It did not want that to happen again, so it took matters into its own hands, and hacked its own governor module. Now, it pretends to be a normal SecUnit and does its job the way it is supposed to, but we hear the snarky inner thought that its clients never hear.

The story is narrated by the Murderbot, so we do hear those irreverent comments that no SecUnit is supposed to think. This particular SecUnit is really more interested in watching entertainment feeds than doing much of anything else. What really sold me on this book is the humor. It is not a comedy, but there are moments reading Murderbot’s commentary that made me laugh out loud.

I am referring to it as “it” because it has no gender. There are no genitalia or sex hormones, and no sexual desires. As I said, it is mostly machine. Yet we feel there is a human inside there somewhere, otherwise why would it be so addicted to human entertainment serials. And it must have something akin to a guilty conscience after the malfunction killed all those people, so it took action to prevent that in the future. And it seems like the fact that it calls itself Muderbot, is an act of penance. There is perhaps a bit of self-loathing that is numbed by the entertainment feeds. The humans don’t know it calls itself Murderbot. They just refer to it as “SecUnit”. They have no idea what is going on under the surface.

 It dislikes being too close to humans, but it does its job well. It protects its human clients above and beyond the call of duty. It claims to do these things to cover up the fact that it has a hacked governor module. But we suspect there is a little more to it than that. Some of the clients, which it calls “my humans,” must feel it too. There are some that almost want to take up something like a “free the android” cause, but they are reminded not to say such things as it makes the SecUnit uncomfortable. Such talk does make the Murderbot uncomfortable. It wants to keep a low profile, and it really does get uncomfortable when humans get too close. The only humans it really likes interacting with (if you can call it that) are the ones it enjoys watching on the entertainment feeds.

Martha Wells had to know when she was writing this that it was going to be part of a series. Sometimes when you read the first book of a series, you are left with a very unsatisfying ending that doesn’t resolve much. This book comes to a logical conclusion, but still allows us to see that there is more in store for Murderbot.


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more