Skip to main content

All Systems Red


 

This year Martha Wells won the Nebula Award for best science fiction novel. Her winning novel was Network Effect. I have never read anything by Martha Wells. I discovered that Network Effect is the fifth book in The Murderbot Diaries series. I decided I had better start at the beginning with the first book: All Systems Red. It turns out All Systems Red won the Hugo, the Nebula Award, and other awards in 2018 for best novella.

The main character calls itself ‘Murderbot’. It is a SecUnit: a security unit, owned by “the company” and contracted out to provide security for survey teams or anyone else who needed security. The Murderbot is some kind of a cyborg, part human and part machine, but it is more machine than human.  It has artificial intelligence and human brain tissue. It does not have status a as person, hence it can be owned. All SecUnits come with governor modules that govern what they can and cannot do. Well, they are supposed to have governor modules. This particular SecUnit had a troubled history. Due to a malfunctioning governor module, it had gone on some kind of rampage and killed a lot of people. It was because of this incident that it decided to call itself Murderbot.  It did not want that to happen again, so it took matters into its own hands, and hacked its own governor module. Now, it pretends to be a normal SecUnit and does its job the way it is supposed to, but we hear the snarky inner thought that its clients never hear.

The story is narrated by the Murderbot, so we do hear those irreverent comments that no SecUnit is supposed to think. This particular SecUnit is really more interested in watching entertainment feeds than doing much of anything else. What really sold me on this book is the humor. It is not a comedy, but there are moments reading Murderbot’s commentary that made me laugh out loud.

I am referring to it as “it” because it has no gender. There are no genitalia or sex hormones, and no sexual desires. As I said, it is mostly machine. Yet we feel there is a human inside there somewhere, otherwise why would it be so addicted to human entertainment serials. And it must have something akin to a guilty conscience after the malfunction killed all those people, so it took action to prevent that in the future. And it seems like the fact that it calls itself Muderbot, is an act of penance. There is perhaps a bit of self-loathing that is numbed by the entertainment feeds. The humans don’t know it calls itself Murderbot. They just refer to it as “SecUnit”. They have no idea what is going on under the surface.

 It dislikes being too close to humans, but it does its job well. It protects its human clients above and beyond the call of duty. It claims to do these things to cover up the fact that it has a hacked governor module. But we suspect there is a little more to it than that. Some of the clients, which it calls “my humans,” must feel it too. There are some that almost want to take up something like a “free the android” cause, but they are reminded not to say such things as it makes the SecUnit uncomfortable. Such talk does make the Murderbot uncomfortable. It wants to keep a low profile, and it really does get uncomfortable when humans get too close. The only humans it really likes interacting with (if you can call it that) are the ones it enjoys watching on the entertainment feeds.

Martha Wells had to know when she was writing this that it was going to be part of a series. Sometimes when you read the first book of a series, you are left with a very unsatisfying ending that doesn’t resolve much. This book comes to a logical conclusion, but still allows us to see that there is more in store for Murderbot.


Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more