Skip to main content

A Coach of Character

 



Okay, one more about my high school track days. But this one is really about my track coach. And it is about character.

The mile relay was a race I did not like (it was called the mile relay before the advent of the metric system. Now the almost equivalent race is called the 4X400 meter relay). The mile relay is the last event of the day. You have run your other races. You are tired, and now you have to run a grueling 400 meter sprint for your leg in the relay. Nobody on our team particularly liked it. But my coach said it was his favorite race. “It builds character,” he said. Much as I am loathe to admit it, he did have a point. Everyone is tired. Everyone is hurting in the race. It teaches you to work for something even when it is unpleasant. You do it for your team. As much as you may not want to inflict pain on yourself, there are three other teammates who are relying on you (not to mention the rest of the track team). You don’t want to let them down, so you give it your best. My coach was right. It builds character.

Character is something Coach Herbert knew something about. Here is a tiny example: I was a kid who liked science so I took a lot of science classes in high school. Herb was a science teacher, so I had a lot of classes with him. You know what grades he gave me? B’s and C’s. He was not the kind of coach who played favorites with his athletes. I know; that is just called doing his job, being a teacher. But there have been some coaches I have known in my life who did pad the grades for their athletes. It’s not right, but it happens. Coach Herbert was not in that group.

Okay, now for a bigger example. As I mentioned in last week’s blog, in my sophomore year in high school at the district track meet I was on a 4X100 meter relay team. I was on the second team or “B” team for my school. The “A” team dropped the baton and we on the “B” team won the event. That meant we qualified our team for the state track meet. Well . . .  it’s a little more complicated than that because if you qualify a relay team, your school can send anyone it wants to be the members of the relay team at State. Our coach would have been within his rights to say to us, “thanks ‘B’ team. Now we are going to send the ‘A’ team to State.” Or, he would have been within his rights to send the four fastest runners to be on the State relay team. Many coaches would have done this. I mean winning is important, right?

That is not what he did. Out of the eight runners who made up our two teams, he selected four for the team going to State. Three of the four were selected solely because they were not going to State in any other event, and two of them were seniors and this would be their last chance to compete at State (He did not even pick the fastest guy in the school because he was already going to state in the 100 and in the 200). This of course hurt our chances of scoring points at State, but it was a classy thing to do. At a time when high school sports had a ‘win at all costs’ mentality, our coach showed us that some things were more important than winning, people for one thing. Our relay team at State did not advance past our preliminary heat. Had our coach decided to pick the four fastest guys to be on the team, we probably would have had a shot at winning.

I was on that relay team, and I could have been bitter about the fact that the coach’s selections had hurt our chances, but I was not. The explanation sounded so reasonable that no one on the team argued with it. You see, the coach had taught us all a lesson more valuable than how to win a race. All these many years later, I hope I have lived a life that lives up to that lesson.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more