Skip to main content

A Coach of Character

 



Okay, one more about my high school track days. But this one is really about my track coach. And it is about character.

The mile relay was a race I did not like (it was called the mile relay before the advent of the metric system. Now the almost equivalent race is called the 4X400 meter relay). The mile relay is the last event of the day. You have run your other races. You are tired, and now you have to run a grueling 400 meter sprint for your leg in the relay. Nobody on our team particularly liked it. But my coach said it was his favorite race. “It builds character,” he said. Much as I am loathe to admit it, he did have a point. Everyone is tired. Everyone is hurting in the race. It teaches you to work for something even when it is unpleasant. You do it for your team. As much as you may not want to inflict pain on yourself, there are three other teammates who are relying on you (not to mention the rest of the track team). You don’t want to let them down, so you give it your best. My coach was right. It builds character.

Character is something Coach Herbert knew something about. Here is a tiny example: I was a kid who liked science so I took a lot of science classes in high school. Herb was a science teacher, so I had a lot of classes with him. You know what grades he gave me? B’s and C’s. He was not the kind of coach who played favorites with his athletes. I know; that is just called doing his job, being a teacher. But there have been some coaches I have known in my life who did pad the grades for their athletes. It’s not right, but it happens. Coach Herbert was not in that group.

Okay, now for a bigger example. As I mentioned in last week’s blog, in my sophomore year in high school at the district track meet I was on a 4X100 meter relay team. I was on the second team or “B” team for my school. The “A” team dropped the baton and we on the “B” team won the event. That meant we qualified our team for the state track meet. Well . . .  it’s a little more complicated than that because if you qualify a relay team, your school can send anyone it wants to be the members of the relay team at State. Our coach would have been within his rights to say to us, “thanks ‘B’ team. Now we are going to send the ‘A’ team to State.” Or, he would have been within his rights to send the four fastest runners to be on the State relay team. Many coaches would have done this. I mean winning is important, right?

That is not what he did. Out of the eight runners who made up our two teams, he selected four for the team going to State. Three of the four were selected solely because they were not going to State in any other event, and two of them were seniors and this would be their last chance to compete at State (He did not even pick the fastest guy in the school because he was already going to state in the 100 and in the 200). This of course hurt our chances of scoring points at State, but it was a classy thing to do. At a time when high school sports had a ‘win at all costs’ mentality, our coach showed us that some things were more important than winning, people for one thing. Our relay team at State did not advance past our preliminary heat. Had our coach decided to pick the four fastest guys to be on the team, we probably would have had a shot at winning.

I was on that relay team, and I could have been bitter about the fact that the coach’s selections had hurt our chances, but I was not. The explanation sounded so reasonable that no one on the team argued with it. You see, the coach had taught us all a lesson more valuable than how to win a race. All these many years later, I hope I have lived a life that lives up to that lesson.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t