Skip to main content

Spotted Owls (part one)

 



Many years ago, I had a job for the US Forest Service as part of the Spotted Owl Survey. This was before the spotted owl was listed as a threatened species under the endangered species act, but there were a lot of people betting that spotted owls would be listed. A number of years before, the Forest Service selected the spotted owl as an indicator species for old growth habitat. An indicator species is like the canary in the coal mine for habitat types. There are lots of different kinds of habitats, old growth forest being one of them. With all of the different organisms living in a given habitat it becomes very difficult to tell if your actions are harming the habitat as a whole.  The idea is that if your indicator species is doing well, then the rest of the organisms in the habitat should also be doing well. Personally, I think that is a bit simplistic to think that you can tell the health of the habitat by looking at one species. There could be tens of thousands of different species living in a given habitat type, each species affects multiple other species intertwined in a complex manner that we can barely begin to understand. 

Nonetheless, the Forest Service picked the spotted owl as its indicator species and that species was not doing well. Interim plans were put in place and that meant more data was required about how many owls there were and where they were nesting. I was put on a team to survey the owls around proposed timber sales in our district. Our job was to go into these places and literally hoot for the owls. We were all well versed in owl-speak, and could make a reasonable facsimile of a spotted owl hoot. We had to learn the calls of all the various types of owls that inhabited the pacific northwest, the saw whet, the pygmy owl, the screech owl, the great horned owl, and the great grey owl. We would get to a station, hoot for ten minutes; if there was no response we would move on to the next station and start again. If we heard a great horned owl we had to stop. They prey on spotted owls. There were a lot of long cold nights with thermoses full of coffee and bags of crunchy food to help keep us awake. If we heard a spotted owl responding, we would immediately stop and take a compass bearing on the sound. We would note the information, go home and return in daylight to try to follow up and find the owl or owls. The daylight search was to determine if there was a nest.

This job was not conducive to a good sleep cycle. For one thing we worked four ten-hour days (nights). We typically worked from 7:00 at night until 5:00 in the morning. After our four nights of work, we had three days off, just enough to get back to an almost normal day rhythm when we had to go back to work and mess up our body clocks again. On top of that, as I said, if we heard an owl respond at night we would immediately go home, sleep for 8 hours (or try) and come back in the daylight to try to find the owl. So our schedule was not even consistent.

The point of all of this was to find nesting spotted owls. Single birds didn’t count. But if there was a nest, that would stop any timber sale that was within a certain radius of the nest. Finding a nest had big-time ramifications. To determine if there was a nest, we would drive to the station where we were the night before and follow our recorded azimuth. That was sometimes easier said than done. The Coast Range has steep hillsides and thick brush of blackberry, salal and sometimes an impenetrable mass of vine maple. One time I was pushing my way through the brush when, “ouch!” A devil’s club spine had gone right through my glove. I looked around and somehow had gotten myself completely surrounded by a patch of devil’s club. One of the many pleasant reminders that we are pretty clumsy trying to maneuver our way through this environment. Humans aren’t really built for this. Oh, to be an owl, and then we could just fly over it. But we are what we are. We pushed on as best we could to try to find a nest.

Finding the nests is actually a story in itself, so I will describe more about that in part 2 of this series.

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...