Skip to main content

Are Shakespeareans Better?

 



Is a Shakespearean actor better than another actor? We do tend to elevate Shakespearean actors, put them on a pedestal. When Patrick Stewart was cast as jean Luc Picard on Star Trek The Next generation the announcement was always prefaced: “ . . . Shakespearean actor, Patrick Stewart . . . “ You often hear of certain actors referred to that way and we are supposed to be impressed. But should we be? Is being a Shakespearean actor make you a better actor that anybody else?

Shakespeare was a great writer. He wrote wonderful lines of dialogue. Maybe actors just sound better, smarter, cleverer when his word come out of their mouths. Perhaps, but isn’t there a technique to Shakespearean acting? Don’t you have to know about iambic pentameter and all that? You don’t just spew the words forth and expect to sound brilliant. True, it is a little different when acting in a Shakespearean play. Actors have to recognize a rhythm to the speech. There are some tips and tricks to be learned, but overall, it is still acting. The fundamentals of acting apply to Shakespearean acting.

Consider the following very partial list of characters played by actors who had early Shakespearean roles:

Gandalf (Ian McKlellan)

Captain Picard (Patrick Stewart)

Professor Snape (Alan Rickman)

Darth Vader (James Earl Jones)

Ash in Alien (Ian Holm)

Captain Von Trapp (Christopher Plummer)

Special Agent Cooper (Kyle MacLaghlin)

The Queen (Helen Mirren)

Dr. Who (William Hartnell, Patrick Troughton, Tom Baker, Paul McGann, David Tennant, Jodie Whittaker)

Ghandi (Ben Kingsley)

M (Judi Dench)

Loki (Tom Hiddleston)

Looking at this diverse list, some people would say, “see, so a Shakespearean actor can do anything.” I would say, no. A good Shakespearean actor can do anything. A mediocre Shakespearean actor is a mediocre actor in whatever part s/he plays. 

I am a fan of Shakespeare and I love when I get the opportunity to put on a Shakespearean role, but that does not make me special. I am only as good (or bad) a Shakespeare actor as I am an actor. Acting is acting. Playing a part is playing a part.

I have seen actors making mistakes doing Shakespeare. It may well be because they are not a very strong actor to begin with. But it may also be due to lack of preparation. It is important to learn what all those words you are saying actually mean. Ignoring the natural cadence and rhythm of the speech can be a mistake too. You don’t want to be a slave to the rhythm, but you do need to recognize it is there. A good actor will put in the work. Mediocre actors tend to get weeded out of Shakespeare plays because they don’t put in the necessary work, so in that sense you could say the Shakespearean actor tends to be better. It is like natural selection, survival of the fittest, or in this case, survival of those willing to do the preparation (that's not to say that an actor who has never played Shakespeare can't be a great actor).  

So perhaps a Shakespearean actor tends to be a better actor by choice. In any event, watching a good Shakespearean actor inhabiting a juicy part is a thing of beauty.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Retired

  I retired this week. So, big lifestyle changes for me? Not so much. I retired on Thursday. My office had an amazing party for me on Wednesday, lots of food, lots of cards, lots of personal connections. Gifts too, I wish I had told them, no gifts. I really don’t need anything. But all this does make one feel appreciated. It also makes me feel appreciated that they want me to come back on a contractual basis every now and then to impart my institutional knowledge. It is always the case when someone retires, knowledge is lost to the organization. Things have to be relearned by the next generation. This is somewhat offset by the fact that the world is changing through advancing technology etc. So, the knowledge that the retiring person has might eventually become obsolete anyway. Better to go out while you are still on top. We have all seen professional athletes who stayed on well beyond their prime. It would have been better to go out while still on top. But it is a hard thing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

My first experience with cyberpunk as a genre of science fiction was Neuromancer by William Gibson. Neuromancer was one of the early works that defined the cyberpunk genre. It was insanely influential. It won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award. But for me, it just did not resonate. I had a hard time visualizing the concepts. It left a bad taste in my mouth for cyberpunk. I mostly avoided the genre. Then a couple of years ago I read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson which is cyberpunk (although some people say it is a parody of cyberpunk). Whatever, I liked it. I recently picked up All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu and it immediately became apparent to me that this was cyberpunk. Julia Z is the main character, and I think this is going to be the start of a series following her. She is a hacker (hence cyberpunk). She has got herself in trouble and so she lives on the margins, barely making it. Then a lawyer asks her for her help. His wife has been kidnapped. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Darkness

  There was a moment when I discovered that l liked dark music. I do like dark music. I like minor keys and a haunting theme. I like other kinds of music too, but that darkness speaks to me in a special way. What does that say about me? Am I messed up? I don’t think so. Maybe I am just built that way that haunting tunes or lyrics imparts some inner truth to me. It resonates. I know precisely when I discovered this about myself. It was Summer of 1971. I was 12 years old. I was on a plane with my family heading to Illinois. Airplanes back then did not have much in the way of entertainment, but what they did have were headphones and music channels you could listen to. I was listening to a channel of popular current hits, and a song came on called “That’s the Way I Always Heard it Should Be” by Carly Simon. I had never heard of Carly Simon. This was before “Anticipation” and “You’re so Vain.” She was not yet famous. But this song came on and, I don’t know, it did something to me. It...
Post a Comment
Read more