Back in the day, if you were a king, or a ruler of any kind,
the idea of marrying your children off to the offspring of another kingdom was
a common practice. That’s how alliances were formed. If you were worried about
country “A” invading you, you could marry your daughter off to the prince of
country “A”. A show of kinship. Attacking your in-laws was frowned upon (that
was the theory, but it didn’t always work out that way in practice). Also, countries "B" and "C" might think twice about invading you. This intermixing was
so commonplace in European history that no one thought twice about it. There
was also the prejudice that only someone of noble blood was worthy of another
with noble blood. Royal children were pawns in a royal chess game.
Take the case of Lucrezia Borgia. She was royal in some
sense of the word since her father was the Pope (Alexander VI). We all know
that priests and popes were not supposed to have children, but such things were
winked at in certain parts of history. Alexander VI (Roderigo Borgia) had
several children that we know of. The Pope was not only the head of
Christianity world-wide, but also the leader of the Papal States at a time when
control of those lands was anything but secure. The Pope had his daughter Lucrezia
marry Giovanni Sforza a member of the powerful House of Sforza who controlled
the city-state of Milan. But politics soon made this marriage less useful to
the Pope, so a charge of impotence was made against Giovanni and the marriage
annulled. Then she was married off to Alfonso of Aragon, Duke of Biscegle and
prince of Salerno. Alfonso was murdered two years later. Then she was married
off to the Duke of Ferrara. This was typical of what could be expected of a
royal daughter. Her name was dragged through the mud, but it was largely due to
the unpopularity of her father rather than anything she did.
One result of all this intermarrying between neighboring
kingdoms was a fair amount of inbreeding. Far from the expected outcome from
breeding with only the best, the offspring often exhibited congenital defects.
Of course, no one knew much about genetics in the Middle Ages or the Renaissance.
They did know something about breeding. They knew breeding animals with similar
traits would produce offspring that would be more likely to have those traits.
That is how domesticated animals and cultivated plants came about. But breeding
the offspring of a wise king to the offspring of a strong king did not
usually result in a child who was to become a wise strong king. It was just as
likely to produce a babbling idiot.
The Hapsburg jaw is but one example. The Hapsburgs were one
of the most powerful families in Europe for generations. They produced a number
of Holy Roman Emperors and ruled as kings in various thrones all around Europe
from 1273 to 1918. Not only did they marry royalty from other European
kingdoms, but they also doubled down on mingling with branches of their own family.
One marked characteristic of the family was their jutting jaw. Inbreeding was
common in the Hapsburg line with first cousins quite often marrying each other.
One of the consequences of this inbreeding was what turned from a firm jaw, in
earlier generations, to a very prominent jaw, to eventually a deformity called
mandibular prognathism. The final Hapsburg king of Spain was Charles II. All
eight of Charles great-grandparents were descendants of the same couple. That
is never a good thing. He had a lower jaw that was so big it was hard for him
to eat and speak properly. That was not the only problem Charles had. He had
mental deficiencies and was in poor health for most of his life. He was also
apparently impotent and fathered no children to succeed him on the throne. You
might think that this was a good thing, but the lack of an heir led to the War
of the Spanish Succession which raged for twelve years.
Hemophilia was common in the royal lines of Europe. Queen
Victoria had one son, three grandsons, and six great-grandsons with hemophilia.
The most famous of these was probably Alexis, son of Czar Nicholas and
Alexandria of Russia, whose ailment caused his mother to give power to
Rasputin, whom she believed could heal her son. The rise of Rasputin was one of
the many factors that led to the weakening of the Czar’s power and the
strengthening of the calls for revolution.
Genetics is all about odds. You get one set of genes from
your mother and one set of genes from your father. Those genes are the
blueprint to construct your body. If you get a defective gene from your father,
that bad trait can be masked by the corresponding good gene from your mother,
or vice versa. Because of this, the defective trait may not show up in the
child. But that child could be a carrier of that gene that then gets passed on
to the next generation. As long as there is good diversity in the gene pool,
the odds are in favor of not exhibiting defects. But when related people start
marrying, the odds of getting matching defective genes gets better. So,
marrying your second cousin is not good. Marrying your first cousin is a very
bad idea. Marrying your sibling is not only a terrible idea, but is outlawed in
most places.
We would hope that in the age of modern science, royalty (and
everyone else) knows better now and would not do this. But even Albert Einstein
married his cousin, so intelligence is no guarantee of good gene sense.
Comments
Post a Comment