Skip to main content

Funky Jaws and Other Problems

 


Back in the day, if you were a king, or a ruler of any kind, the idea of marrying your children off to the offspring of another kingdom was a common practice. That’s how alliances were formed. If you were worried about country “A” invading you, you could marry your daughter off to the prince of country “A”. A show of kinship. Attacking your in-laws was frowned upon (that was the theory, but it didn’t always work out that way in practice). Also, countries "B" and "C" might think twice about invading you. This intermixing was so commonplace in European history that no one thought twice about it. There was also the prejudice that only someone of noble blood was worthy of another with noble blood. Royal children were pawns in a royal chess game.

Take the case of Lucrezia Borgia. She was royal in some sense of the word since her father was the Pope (Alexander VI). We all know that priests and popes were not supposed to have children, but such things were winked at in certain parts of history. Alexander VI (Roderigo Borgia) had several children that we know of. The Pope was not only the head of Christianity world-wide, but also the leader of the Papal States at a time when control of those lands was anything but secure. The Pope had his daughter Lucrezia marry Giovanni Sforza a member of the powerful House of Sforza who controlled the city-state of Milan. But politics soon made this marriage less useful to the Pope, so a charge of impotence was made against Giovanni and the marriage annulled. Then she was married off to Alfonso of Aragon, Duke of Biscegle and prince of Salerno. Alfonso was murdered two years later. Then she was married off to the Duke of Ferrara. This was typical of what could be expected of a royal daughter. Her name was dragged through the mud, but it was largely due to the unpopularity of her father rather than anything she did.

One result of all this intermarrying between neighboring kingdoms was a fair amount of inbreeding. Far from the expected outcome from breeding with only the best, the offspring often exhibited congenital defects. Of course, no one knew much about genetics in the Middle Ages or the Renaissance. They did know something about breeding. They knew breeding animals with similar traits would produce offspring that would be more likely to have those traits. That is how domesticated animals and cultivated plants came about. But breeding the offspring of a wise king to the offspring of a strong king did not usually result in a child who was to become a wise strong king. It was just as likely to produce a babbling idiot.

The Hapsburg jaw is but one example. The Hapsburgs were one of the most powerful families in Europe for generations. They produced a number of Holy Roman Emperors and ruled as kings in various thrones all around Europe from 1273 to 1918. Not only did they marry royalty from other European kingdoms, but they also doubled down on mingling with branches of their own family. One marked characteristic of the family was their jutting jaw. Inbreeding was common in the Hapsburg line with first cousins quite often marrying each other. One of the consequences of this inbreeding was what turned from a firm jaw, in earlier generations, to a very prominent jaw, to eventually a deformity called mandibular prognathism. The final Hapsburg king of Spain was Charles II. All eight of Charles great-grandparents were descendants of the same couple. That is never a good thing. He had a lower jaw that was so big it was hard for him to eat and speak properly. That was not the only problem Charles had. He had mental deficiencies and was in poor health for most of his life. He was also apparently impotent and fathered no children to succeed him on the throne. You might think that this was a good thing, but the lack of an heir led to the War of the Spanish Succession which raged for twelve years.

Hemophilia was common in the royal lines of Europe. Queen Victoria had one son, three grandsons, and six great-grandsons with hemophilia. The most famous of these was probably Alexis, son of Czar Nicholas and Alexandria of Russia, whose ailment caused his mother to give power to Rasputin, whom she believed could heal her son. The rise of Rasputin was one of the many factors that led to the weakening of the Czar’s power and the strengthening of the calls for revolution.

Genetics is all about odds. You get one set of genes from your mother and one set of genes from your father. Those genes are the blueprint to construct your body. If you get a defective gene from your father, that bad trait can be masked by the corresponding good gene from your mother, or vice versa. Because of this, the defective trait may not show up in the child. But that child could be a carrier of that gene that then gets passed on to the next generation. As long as there is good diversity in the gene pool, the odds are in favor of not exhibiting defects. But when related people start marrying, the odds of getting matching defective genes gets better. So, marrying your second cousin is not good. Marrying your first cousin is a very bad idea. Marrying your sibling is not only a terrible idea, but is outlawed in most places.

We would hope that in the age of modern science, royalty (and everyone else) knows better now and would not do this. But even Albert Einstein married his cousin, so intelligence is no guarantee of good gene sense.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t