Skip to main content

Klara and the Sun (review)

 


Robot stories can, if well-written, get you to feel for the robot and tug at your heartstrings. Asimov did it. Bradbury did it. Kazuo Ishiguro, being a Nobel laureate, certainly has the writing credentials, and his novel Klara and the Sun, does not disappoint.

We meet Klara and her friend Rosa on display in a shop. We are never explicitly told they are robots. They are referred to as AFs which we eventually learn means Artificial Friends. These robots are intended as companions for children of rather well-to-do families. We see the world through Klara’s eyes. In the beginning that world consists of the interior of the store and what little that can be seen out the display window (when they are lucky enough to be on display). I found myself reminded of stories about orphans. Just as children in an orphanage pine for the day when the right couple will come and give them a forever home, so the AF’s wait for the child who will make a connection with them and take them home. It is made clear that some AFs, just like some orphans, never find a home.

Klara is a keen observer of humanity. She makes conclusions about her observations. Many of those conclusions are spot on, others, while they seem logical to her, do not pan out. Based on her own observations, she invents her own supernatural belief system. She is not trying to invent a religion, it just sort of springs logically from what she has seen. She is solar powered; she sees people outside who enjoy themselves and even seem healthier while the sun is out. Therefore, the sun must give them nourishment too. Therefore, the sun must be the giver of life. While this may be a flawed conclusion, it gives her something to hang on to when things get dark.

Eventually, Klara connects with a child, is taken home, and the two have a wonderful relationship. But all is not well in the new home. Her new friend Josie has an illness that her mother fears may one day take her life. Josie, her mother, and Josie’s best friend are all affected by Josies illness. Klara is too. She pursues a plan to make Josie well and bring harmony into the home. Her plan is developed using her brand of logic. Josie’s mother also has a plan using her own brand of logic. We readers may scoff at Klara’s naïve plan, but we like the mother’s plan even less.

Klara comes to see a whole host of human emotions, joy, love, guilt, grief, hope, pride, gratitude, anger. We see her absorbing these things, finding a kind of understanding about them. In the end, Klara does not turn into a human, literally or figuratively, but she has her own kind of wisdom. There is sheer beauty in Klara. She is a character that we care about. Like any character, she can teach us something about the human condition.

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...