The Apocalypse with Comic Pratfalls

Dystopian fun, sound like an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. Dystopian fiction takes place in the future (usually) where things are not going well, where there is hardship and suffering. Examples include the novel 1984 by George Orwell, A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess, Make Room, Make Room by Harry Harrison, The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. Or instead of being set in the future, it can be set in an alternate history like Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle. Dystopia is the opposite of utopia. In short, it does not sound like a fun place to be, right?

But I recently read a novella by Charlie Jane Anders called “Rock Manning Goes for Broke.” It’s a hoot. It takes place in a near future where the government and militias are sort of competing to see who can be worse. Yet the Novella has more in common with silent movie comedies than it does with 1984. The protagonist, Rock manning, is a young man who seems to be a modern Harold Lloyd or Buster Keaton. He doesn’t seem to mind crashing, falling, being run into or hit over the head. If there was entertainment in it, he was willing to go through it. In school, bullies found that it was pointless to beat him up because he would mess himself up faster than they could keep up with.

He meets a girl named Sally and they become best friends. They do art together. Their art consists of films, usually involving something like Rock Manning riding on a broken bicycle that is on fire while going over a cliff, or some such. Rock seems indestructible in a cartoon sort of way. The world around them continues to get darker with war, government lies, conspiracy theories that fuel repression, and the breakdown of society. Still Rock and Sally continue making their films. They are not oblivious to what is going on, but to them, it is even more reason for them to pursue their art. Comic disasters are their defense against what is increasingly becoming a train crash of a world they live in. When Rock is questioning his worth and worrying about the danger he is putting other people in, Sally tells him, “You are good for exactly one thing and one thing only, and that’s turning people’s brains off for a few minutes. You should stick to that.”

This story was in a collection by Charlie Jane Anders called Even Greater Mistakes. This might not be the most important story in the collection, but for me, it was the most fun. (There are plenty of other good stories in the collection and I recommend it as a whole.)

Dystopian fun. Could be a whole new genre.

Star Liner

Comments

A Child of the . . .

What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school. It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...

Bureaucrats

I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law. If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...

A speculative mind

Search This Blog