Skip to main content

Canaveral

 



In 1963 Cape Canaveral was the place all NASA rockets launched from. But then in November of that year President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. It was a shocking moment for the country. Other presidents had been assassinated before, but none in the modern age, with reporters giving minute by minute updates. Anyone who was alive on November 22nd, 1963 would always remember where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news. As a way of honoring Kennedy, who was linked to the space program in the public’s mind, President Johnson signed an executive order renaming Cape Canaveral to Cape Kennedy. But having the name changed on so prominent a geographic feature did not sit well with many Floridians. It remained Cape Kennedy until in 1973 when the Florida legislature changed it back to Canaveral.

The oldest map that contains the name Cape Canaveral is from 1564. It was the Spanish who named many of the geographic features of the area and “canaveral” means canebrake in Spanish, though no one seems to know precisely why it was called that. There has never been any sugarcane growing there though perhaps some of the reeds were cane-like. In my ignorance I had always assumed that Cape Canaveral was the southernmost tip of Florida. I knew that the closer to the equator you are, the easier it is to get a rocket into orbit, because you are using the earth’s own momentum to get you partly up to speed. So, it seemed logical that the launch complex would be as far south as you could go. Perhaps a reasonable assumption, but wrong. Cape Canaveral is in the middle of Florida’s Atlantic coast on a barrier island. It lies east of Orlando.

But there is one Canaveral I have never been able to find out any information about. Being a cartographer, I love old maps. I have at various times explored David Rumsey’s map collection and I encourage you to visit it: (https://www.davidrumsey.com/). If you are like me, you will be enthralled. I have looked at a variety of maps of the Oregon coast, and on some of the older ones I find a curious geographic feature named Canaveral Bay. It is on Barber’s 1835 map of the United States. It is also on Burr’s 1839 map of the United States. It appears on the Carl Weiland map of 1828, but it does not appear on George Vancouver’s map of 1828. I don’t see it on any maps after 1839.

What bay are they talking about? The maps show it between Cape Foulweather and Cape Perpetua, lying closer to Foulweather. These are two well-known capes named by Captain Cook which are still called Perpetua and Foulweather today. Between those two capes are Yaquina Bay and Alsea Bay. Canaveral could be one of those, with Yaquina Bay being the more likely.  But it is not that simple. Things that appear on an 1830’s map are not necessarily in the right place. There are lots of errors on old maps and some features get mistaken for others. The large indentation of Canaveral Bay shown on the maps does not really resemble any geographic feature on the Oregon Coast. The closest approximation in my mind would be Tillamook Bay which is way to the north or Coos Bay which is way to the south. Cartographers tended to copy each other. So, if one put a feature on a map the next one without primary sources might do the same. “Weiland had it on his map so I will put it on mine, right?” Perhaps that is what is going on. I doubt if Weiland was the one who named it. Why would Weiland, a German, give a Spanish name to something that was outside of Spanish America? There was at least one Spanish explorer that made it that far up the Oregon coast, that being Bruno Heceta in 1775. Perhaps someone on his expedition made a reference to it. Although calling something “Canebrake Bay” makes even less sense on the Oregon Coast than it does in the Florida site.

Canaveral Bay remains a mystery. Maybe not the most compelling mystery to some, but it is interesting to me. Who named it? Why was it named that? What bay were they talking about? Why was the name discontinued (if it ever really existed)? It is one of those little facts lost to the sea of time, perhaps ever to remain so.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, wh...
1 comment
Read more

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up...
1 comment
Read more

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more