Skip to main content

Canaveral

 



In 1963 Cape Canaveral was the place all NASA rockets launched from. But then in November of that year President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. It was a shocking moment for the country. Other presidents had been assassinated before, but none in the modern age, with reporters giving minute by minute updates. Anyone who was alive on November 22nd, 1963 would always remember where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news. As a way of honoring Kennedy, who was linked to the space program in the public’s mind, President Johnson signed an executive order renaming Cape Canaveral to Cape Kennedy. But having the name changed on so prominent a geographic feature did not sit well with many Floridians. It remained Cape Kennedy until in 1973 when the Florida legislature changed it back to Canaveral.

The oldest map that contains the name Cape Canaveral is from 1564. It was the Spanish who named many of the geographic features of the area and “canaveral” means canebrake in Spanish, though no one seems to know precisely why it was called that. There has never been any sugarcane growing there though perhaps some of the reeds were cane-like. In my ignorance I had always assumed that Cape Canaveral was the southernmost tip of Florida. I knew that the closer to the equator you are, the easier it is to get a rocket into orbit, because you are using the earth’s own momentum to get you partly up to speed. So, it seemed logical that the launch complex would be as far south as you could go. Perhaps a reasonable assumption, but wrong. Cape Canaveral is in the middle of Florida’s Atlantic coast on a barrier island. It lies east of Orlando.

But there is one Canaveral I have never been able to find out any information about. Being a cartographer, I love old maps. I have at various times explored David Rumsey’s map collection and I encourage you to visit it: (https://www.davidrumsey.com/). If you are like me, you will be enthralled. I have looked at a variety of maps of the Oregon coast, and on some of the older ones I find a curious geographic feature named Canaveral Bay. It is on Barber’s 1835 map of the United States. It is also on Burr’s 1839 map of the United States. It appears on the Carl Weiland map of 1828, but it does not appear on George Vancouver’s map of 1828. I don’t see it on any maps after 1839.

What bay are they talking about? The maps show it between Cape Foulweather and Cape Perpetua, lying closer to Foulweather. These are two well-known capes named by Captain Cook which are still called Perpetua and Foulweather today. Between those two capes are Yaquina Bay and Alsea Bay. Canaveral could be one of those, with Yaquina Bay being the more likely.  But it is not that simple. Things that appear on an 1830’s map are not necessarily in the right place. There are lots of errors on old maps and some features get mistaken for others. The large indentation of Canaveral Bay shown on the maps does not really resemble any geographic feature on the Oregon Coast. The closest approximation in my mind would be Tillamook Bay which is way to the north or Coos Bay which is way to the south. Cartographers tended to copy each other. So, if one put a feature on a map the next one without primary sources might do the same. “Weiland had it on his map so I will put it on mine, right?” Perhaps that is what is going on. I doubt if Weiland was the one who named it. Why would Weiland, a German, give a Spanish name to something that was outside of Spanish America? There was at least one Spanish explorer that made it that far up the Oregon coast, that being Bruno Heceta in 1775. Perhaps someone on his expedition made a reference to it. Although calling something “Canebrake Bay” makes even less sense on the Oregon Coast than it does in the Florida site.

Canaveral Bay remains a mystery. Maybe not the most compelling mystery to some, but it is interesting to me. Who named it? Why was it named that? What bay were they talking about? Why was the name discontinued (if it ever really existed)? It is one of those little facts lost to the sea of time, perhaps ever to remain so.

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t