Review: Solaris by Stanislaw Lem

Solaris is a classic science fiction novel By Stanislaw Lem that has been made into three different movies. Solaris is one of those mind-bending experiences that leave you wondering what is real and what is hallucination. When we meet our protagonist, Kelvin, he seems a perfectly ordinary kind of fellow. He is on a mission to join the crew on a legendary station floating over a world that is almost certainly a living organism.

When he arrives at the station, things are not as he expected. One man is dead and the other two are acting strangely. The book becomes a psychological thriller for the remainder (though “thriller” is perhaps too strong a word). But it does keep you guessing. Is he really seeing other people, are they ghosts, or is the planet manifesting them? Is the planet trying to communicate with them in some way, or are they all going insane?

This is not a quick or an easy read. The pace moves agonizingly slow at times, and there is too much exposition about the history of the station, the planet, and past explorers. The characters sometimes make awkward choices. The wonders of the planet are recorded in catalogue fashion as seen through the eyes of a text book. With a translated work, one is never quite sure if the pacing and awkwardness is due to the author or the translator. This version says it was translated from the French by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox. That means it was translated from the original Polish into French, then into English (Lem himself disapproved of this translation).

Still, Solaris takes you on a disturbing, almost psychedelic journey. In the era these men come from, the planet Solaris is the biggest mystery anyone has ever known, and people have been trying to make sense of it for over a hundred years. We feel that sense of mystery too, and we wonder where it will lead. It certainly seems like the planet is trying to communicate with them, but can a living planet and humans have anything in common? If two species are so vastly different, can communication even be possible without one or the other going mad? The question is not really answered in this book. It is only hinted at.

Star Liner

Comments

Second Wind

You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running. In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, wh...

The Outsider

I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up...

A Child of the . . .

What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school. It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...

A speculative mind

Search This Blog