Skip to main content

Sunstorm

 


Sunstorm By Arthur C. Clark and Stephen Baxter is the conclusion of the duology that began in Time’s Eye. The duology is a first contact story. In Time's Eye, our characters have been put through a ‘discontinuity’ where different pieces of earth have been scrambled into different times. For example, the helicopter gunship crew we have been following, find themselves trapped in time with people from other time periods.  The only clue to what is behind it are metallic spheres that hover over the ground. Our characters have taken to calling them “eyes,” and they do seem to watch events as they unfold.

As far as we know, only one person gets back to her own time period. That is Bisesa from the helicopter gunship. Before she is taken to her own time, she is allowed to glimpse a far future Earth. A dead future Earth. As she returns to her own time at the end of the first book and the start of the second, Sunstorm, she knows something bad is about to happen to Earth.

We soon learn that there is to be a major solar event. It will be an event so massive that it will wipe out all life on Earth. Sterilize the planet. So, this becomes a story about the humans trying to find a way to survive the event. They have four years to undertake a monumental project. The main characters know that even if this project is successful, many people are going to die. Of course, if it is unsuccessful, everyone is going to die. We see the fatalism. We see the denial. We see religious extremism. For the most part, what we do not see is surrender. We see reevaluated priorities. In the first book, Bisesa realized  that she had spent too much time absent from her daughter’s life. She decides time with her daughter must be the fundamental priority now.

This unfolds as humankind is on the verge of being a spacefaring species. We have a colony on the Moon and the start of a presence on Mars. But it is not as if humans can simply escape. The solar event will affect The Moon and Mars as well, and even if it did not, the human presence in space is not enough of a beachhead to survive as a species.  

A number of years ago I read a novel that was another collaboration between Arthur C. Clarke and a different writer. That one was not so smooth. There was nothing wrong with the idea of the story, but the difference in styles was jarring. It did not feel like an Arthur C. Clark novel. It felt more like a TV movie of the week. This collaboration between Clarke and Baxter works much better. The big ideas are there, and they are well executed.

This is a first contact story where we never actually meet the aliens. We only see the “eyes” which are mechanical devices meant only to see or record the events which they have set in motion. We learn very little about them, except that they are not our friends. A not so gentle reminder that first contact could be a perilous thing.

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t